Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

There's been loads of cases where the evidence was presented and then dismissed on its merits, heres a few to get you started, though there's lots more.

Bowyer v Ducey - https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Order-Granting-MTD.pdf "Plaintiffs have not moved the needle for their fraud theory from conceivable to plausible"

King v Whitmer - https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Preview_7405F132-B4F1-4A0A-9BB1-28CB11C48E21.pdf "Nothing but speculation and conjecture"

Trump v Benson - https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/20201106-Opin-and-Ord.pdf "hearsay within hearsay"

Arizona Republican Party v. Fontes - https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/CV2020014553-elections-m.e.-1.pdf "A theory for which no evidence exists" "the real issue" was not fraud, but "the outcome of the election"

Ward v Jackson - https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/AscDecisionOrder-3939735-0.pdf "the challenge fails to present any evidence of misconduct [or] illegal votes”

Who told you that they'd refused to hear the evidence and what steps did you take to verify if that was accurate?

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

There's been loads of cases where the evidence was presented and then dismissed on its merits, heres a few to get you started, though there's lots more.

Bowyer v Ducey - https://t.co/F2vllUhM2G?amp=1 "Plaintiffs have not moved the needle for their fraud theory from conceivable to plausible"

King v Whitmer - https://t.co/NZAtqivWkL?amp=1 "Nothing but speculation and conjecture"

Trump v Benson - https://t.co/17GeGhImHF?amp=1 "hearsay within hearsay"

Arizona Republican Party v. Fontes - https://t.co/5aTdtXbcrv?amp=1 "A theory for which no evidence exists" "the real issue" was not fraud, but "the outcome of the election"

Ward v Jackson - https://t.co/w16Cmnga9G?amp=1 "the challenge fails to present any evidence of misconduct [or] illegal votes”

Who told you that they'd refused to hear the evidence and what steps did you take to verify if that was accurate?

3 years ago
1 score