Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: typo

This is the only viable conclusion I can make based on the following:

  1. Trump is not a savior and is part of the establishment (Israel support, Warp Speed, Epstein ties, tycoon and Hollywood background etc.) He has powerful interests behind him and he's just a front to them. The guy's a grifter and an actor (like Zelensky)

  2. Powerful entities don't want Trump since the 2016 election and when all failed, they tried to kill him Kennedy style (whoever shot at him, the bullet was real and would have killed him had he not moved his head, this is obvious)

My theory is that there is infight within the global elites and there are two opposing factions. As for their motives, I'd speculate they are geopolitical in nature.

The Trump faction is partial to the neocon idea of US hegemony which is obviously slipping away because of the obvious subversion the country is going through for the past few decades in all spheres - economical, financial, cultural, societal and infrastructural. This faction sees the rising threat from nationalist states like China and Russia and understands it will lose its position if the US doesn't revert back to the Kissinger era realpolitik. This is the good old imperialist way of thinking that people like Cecil Rhodes had. It also matches what Oswald Spengler predicted for the 21c - resource wars between nation states, Caesarism and despotism (endless wars as in 1984).

The other faction is the classic NWO corporate socialist technocrats who seek to depop, deindustrialize (net zero circular austerity economy) and to abolish nation states, subjugating all people under a centralized international beast system modeled after the UN and the EU. Basically Huxley's Brave New World.

Both factions agree on the means used but the ends are essentially different.

The counter to that is that there are no factions and everything is staged to steer us in the NWO scenario but I see many holes in that theory.

123 days ago
4 score
Reason: None provided.

This is the only viable conclusion I can make based on the following:

  1. Trump is not a savior and is part of the establishment (Israel support, Warp Speed, Epstein ties, tycoon and Hollywood background etc.) He has powerful interests behind him and he's just a front to them. The guy's a grifter and an actor (like Zelensky)

  2. Powerful entities don't want Trump since the 2016 election and when all failed, they tried to kill him Kennedy style (whoever shot at him, the bullet was real and would have killed him had he not moved his head, this is obvious)

My theory is that there is infight within the global elites and there are two opposing fractions. As for their motives, I'd speculate they are geopolitical in nature.

The Trump fraction is partial to the neocon idea of US hegemony which is obviously slipping away because of the obvious subversion the country is going through for the past few decades in all spheres - economical, financial, cultural, societal and infrastructural. This fraction sees the rising threat from nationalist states like China and Russia and understands it will lose its position if the US doesn't revert back to the Kissinger era realpolitik. This is the good old imperialist way of thinking that people like Cecil Rhodes had. It also matches what Oswald Spengler predicted for the 21c - resource wars between nation states, Caesarism and despotism (endless wars as in 1984).

The other fraction is the classic NWO corporate socialist technocrats who seek to depop, deindustrialize (net zero circular austerity economy) and to abolish nation states, subjugating all people under a centralized international beast system modeled after the UN and the EU. Basically Huxley's Brave New World.

Both fractions agree on the means used but the ends are essentially different.

The counter to that is that there are no fractions and everything is staged to steer us in the NWO scenario but I see many holes in that theory.

123 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

This is the only viable conclusion I can make based on the following:

  1. Trump is not a savior and is part of the establishment (Israel support, Warp Speed, Epstein ties, tycoon and Hollywood background etc.) He has powerful interests behind him and he's just a front to them. The guy's a grifter and an actor (like Zelensky)

  2. Powerful entities don't want Trump since the 2016 election and when all failed, they tried to kill him Kennedy style (whoever shot at him, the bullet was real and would have killed him had he not moved his head, this is obvious)

My theory is that there is infight within the global elites and there are two opposing fractions. As for their motives, I'd speculate they are geopolitical in nature.

The Trump fraction is partial to the neocon idea of US hegemony which is obviously slipping away because of the obvious subversion the country is going through for the past few decades in all spheres - economical, financial, cultural, societal and infrastructural. This fraction sees the rising threat from nationalist states like China and Russia and understands it will lose its position if the US doesn't revert back to the Kissinger era realpolitik. This is the good old imperialist way of thinking that people like Cecil Rhodes had. It also matches what Oswald Spengler predicted for the 21c - resource wars between nation states, Caesarism and despotism (endless wars as in 1984).

The other fraction is the classic NWO corporate socialist technocrats who seek to depop, deindustrialize (net zero circular austerity economy) and to abolish nation states, subjugating all people under a centralized international beast system modeled after the UN and the EU. Basically Huxley's Brave New World.

Both fractions agree on the means used but the ends are essentially different.

The counter to that is that there are no fractions and everything is staged to steer us in the NWO scenario but I see problems in that theory.

123 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

This is the only viable conclusion I can make based on the following:

  1. Trump is not a savior and is part of the establishment (Israel support, Warp Speed, Epstein ties, tycoon and Hollywood background etc.) He has powerful interests behind him and he's just a front to them. The guy's a grifter and an actor (like Zelensky)

  2. Powerful entities don't want Trump since the 2016 election and when all failed, they tried to kill him Kennedy style (whoever shot at him, the bullet was real and would have killed him had he not moved his head, this is obvious)

My theory is that there is infight within the global elites and there are two opposing fractions. As for their motives, I'd speculate they are geopolitical in nature.

The Trump fraction is partial to the neocon idea of US hegemony which is obviously slipping away because of the obvious subversion the country is going through for the past few decades in all spheres - economical, financial, cultural, societal and infrastructural. This fraction sees the rising threat from nationalist states like China and Russia and understands it will lose its position if the US doesn't revert back to the Kissinger era realpolitik. This is the good old imperialist way of thinking that people like Cecil Rhodes had. It also matches what Oswald Spengler predicted for the 21c - resource wars between nation states, Caesarism and despotism.

The other fraction is the classic NWO corporate socialist technocrats who seek to depop, deindustrialize (net zero circular austerity economy) and to abolish nation states, subjugating all people under a centralized international beast system modeled after the UN and the EU. Basically Huxley's Brave New World.

Both fractions agree on the means used but the ends are essentially different.

The counter to that is that there are no fractions and everything is staged to steer us in the NWO scenario but I see problems in that theory.

123 days ago
1 score