Pay attention.

(There are so many bases he is doctrinally sound on. Pretty sure he's sound on all of em.) <-- Outdated, replies in OP thread have now shown why TS believes and says that.

Did you mean ‘false’?

Things can be claimed AS statements of fact, whether the person knows or does not know if the info is false or true.

"No grand conspiracy behind the quote."

Pulled it out of thin air, made it up, completely out of context, irrelevant to the discussion, not even close to anything anyone said remotely related to the topic. So yeah, the conspiracy is “You made up [EPHESIANS 4:29!] for absolutely no conceivable reason.”

Again

Thanks for admitting you didn’t even try. You’re done here.

The two aren't even comparable or in the same category.

They’re both fallacies. And you purposely misrepresented what I said. Try again with some effort.

Well that's what others will believe

Nah, it’s not.

Case study: this exchange.

Your single data point is not representative of anything other than

your individual mental illness.

Nonexistent.

After how long?

About five seconds.

And people are unique, you know.

Objective data metrics aren’t.

.. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. .

[You are making your best guesses, AT BEST. I doubt you are 100% sure on your theory.]

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

P

He’s shilling against it.

On what aspects? Is he claiming the Trinity is false? That Jesus didn't exist?

[and more]

P

.

Pay attention.

(There are so many bases he is doctrinally sound on. Pretty sure he's sound on all of em.) <-- Outdated, replies in OP thread have now shown why TS believes and says that.

Did you mean ‘false’?

Things can be claimed AS statements of fact, whether the person knows or does not know if the info is false or true.

No grand conspiracy behind the quote.

Pulled it out of thin air, made it up, completely out of context, irrelevant to the discussion, not even close to anything anyone said remotely related to the topic. So yeah, the conspiracy is “You made up [EPHESIANS 4:29!] for absolutely no conceivable reason.”

Again

Thanks for admitting you didn’t even try. You’re done here.

The two aren't even comparable or in the same category.

They’re both fallacies. And you purposely misrepresented what I said. Try again with some effort.

Well that's what others will believe

Nah, it’s not.

Case study: this exchange.

Your single data point is not representative of anything other than

your individual mental illness.

Nonexistent.

After how long?

About five seconds.

And people are unique, you know.

Objective data metrics aren’t.

.. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. .

[You are making your best guesses, AT BEST. I doubt you are 100% sure on your theory.]

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

P

He’s shilling against it.

On what aspects? Is he claiming the Trinity is false? That Jesus didn't exist?

[and more]

P

.

Pay attention.

(There are so many bases he is doctrinally sound on. Pretty sure he's sound on all of em.) <-- Outdated, replies in OP thread has shown why TS believes and says that.

Did you mean ‘false’?

Things can be claimed AS statements of fact, whether the person knows or does not know if the info is false or true.

No grand conspiracy behind the quote.

Pulled it out of thin air, made it up, completely out of context, irrelevant to the discussion, not even close to anything anyone said remotely related to the topic. So yeah, the conspiracy is “You made up [EPHESIANS 4:29!] for absolutely no conceivable reason.”

Again

Thanks for admitting you didn’t even try. You’re done here.

The two aren't even comparable or in the same category.

They’re both fallacies. And you purposely misrepresented what I said. Try again with some effort.

Well that's what others will believe

Nah, it’s not.

Case study: this exchange.

Your single data point is not representative of anything other than

your individual mental illness.

Nonexistent.

After how long?

About five seconds.

And people are unique, you know.

Objective data metrics aren’t.

.. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. .

[You are making your best guesses, AT BEST. I doubt you are 100% sure on your theory.]

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

P

He’s shilling against it.

On what aspects? Is he claiming the Trinity is false? That Jesus didn't exist?

[and more]

P

.

Pay attention.

There are so many bases he is doctrinally sound on. Pretty sure he's sound on all of em.

Apparently you believe I should

Did you mean ‘false’?

Things can be claimed AS statements of fact, whether the person knows or does not know if the info is false or true.

No grand conspiracy behind the quote.

Pulled it out of thin air, made it up, completely out of context, irrelevant to the discussion, not even close to anything anyone said remotely related to the topic. So yeah, the conspiracy is “You made up [EPHESIANS 4:29!] for absolutely no conceivable reason.”

Again

Thanks for admitting you didn’t even try. You’re done here.

The two aren't even comparable or in the same category.

They’re both fallacies. And you purposely misrepresented what I said. Try again with some effort.

Well that's what others will believe

Nah, it’s not.

Case study: this exchange.

Your single data point is not representative of anything other than

your individual mental illness.

Nonexistent.

After how long?

About five seconds.

And people are unique, you know.

Objective data metrics aren’t.

.. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. .

[You are making your best guesses, AT BEST. I doubt you are 100% sure on your theory.]

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

P

He’s shilling against it.

On what aspects? Is he claiming the Trinity is false? That Jesus didn't exist?

[and more]

P

.

On what aspects?

Pay attention.

That would mean he makes fact statements that contradict what he believes.

Did you mean ‘false’?

No grand conspiracy behind the quote.

Pulled it out of thin air, made it up, completely out of context, irrelevant to the discussion, not even close to anything anyone said remotely related to the topic. So yeah, the conspiracy is “You made up [EPHESIANS 4:29!] for absolutely no conceivable reason.”

Again

Thanks for admitting you didn’t even try. You’re done here.

The two aren't even comparable or in the same category.

They’re both fallacies. And you purposely misrepresented what I said. Try again with some effort.

Well that's what others will believe

Nah, it’s not.

Case study: this exchange.

Your single data point is not representative of anything other than

your individual mental illness.

Nonexistent.

After how long?

About five seconds.

And people are unique, you know.

Objective data metrics aren’t.

.. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. .

[You are making your best guesses, AT BEST. I doubt you are 100% sure on your theory.]

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

P

He’s shilling against it.

On what aspects? Is he claiming the Trinity is false? That Jesus didn't exist?

[and more]

P

.

On what aspects?

Pay attention.

That would mean he makes fact statements that contradict what he believes.

Did you mean ‘false’?

No grand conspiracy behind the quote.

Pulled it out of thin air, made it up, completely out of context, irrelevant to the discussion, not even close to anything anyone said remotely related to the topic. So yeah, the conspiracy is “You made up [EPHESIANS 4:29!] for absolutely no conceivable reason.”

Again

Thanks for admitting you didn’t even try. You’re done here.

The two aren't even comparable or in the same category.

They’re both fallacies. And you purposely misrepresented what I said. Try again with some effort.

Well that's what others will believe

Nah, it’s not.

Case study: this exchange.

Your single data point is not representative of anything other than

your individual mental illness.

Nonexistent.

After how long?

About five seconds.

And people are unique, you know.

Objective data metrics aren’t.

.. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. .

[You are making your best guesses, AT BEST. I doubt you are 100% sure on your theory.]

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

P

He’s shilling against it.

On what aspects? Is he claiming the Trinity is false? That Jesus didn't exist?

[and more]

P

.

.. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. .

[You are making your best guesses, AT BEST. I doubt you are 100% sure on your theory.]

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

P

He’s shilling against it.

On what aspects? Is he claiming the Trinity is false? That Jesus didn't exist?

[and more]

P

.

.. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. .

[You are making your best guesses, AT BEST. I doubt you are 100% sure on your theory.]

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

P

He’s shilling against it.

On what aspects? Is he claiming the Trinity is false? That Jesus didn't exist?

[and more]

P

.

.. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. .

[You are making your best guesses, AT BEST. I doubt you are 100% sure on your theory.]

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

P

He’s shilling against it.

On what aspects? Is he claiming the Trinity is false? That Jesus didn't exist?

Yes, which is why he lies about it.

That would mean he makes fact statements that contradict what he believes.

Wow, much conspiracy. Such evidence.

Great job not even pretending to construct a believable strawman.

Get f'd.

I do hope I never get [TERM UNUSABLE DUE TO EPHESIANS 4:29]'ed by "Karmelo Braagabillus Onni-krung" or "Muhammad Mustafa Ali Khamed Hassan the 50 billionth".

You didn’t even TRY to reply to what I said.

There's no graaaand conspiracy in the comment of his that I quoted.

So you believe that begging the question and circular reasoning are two different fallacies?

So you beat your wife? Not playing your game.

The two aren't even conprable or in the same category.

No, that’s not how I present it.

Well that's what others will believe you presented it as. Case study: this exchange.

Nobody will ever, organically, get the conclusion "oh behavior”.

People with triple digit IQs naturally make these conclusions.

After how long? And people are unique, you know. Some may or may not.

.. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. .

[You are making your best guesses, AT BEST. I doubt you are 100% sure on your theory.]

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

P

He’s shilling against it.

On what aspects? Is he claiming the Trinity is false? That Jesus didn't exist?

Yes, which is why he lies about it.

That would mean he makes fact statements that contradict what he believes.

Wow, much conspiracy. Such evidence.

Great job not even pretending to construct a believable strawman.

Get f'd.

I do hope I never get [TERM UNUSABLE DUE TO EPHESIANS 4:29]'ed by "Karmelo Braagabillus Onni-krung" or "Muhammad Mustafa Ali Khamed Hassan the 50 billionth".

You didn’t even TRY to reply to what I said.

There's no graaaand conspiracy in the comment of his that I quoted.

So you believe that begging the question and circular reasoning are two different fallacies?

So you beat your wife? Not playing your game.

The way you present it

No, that’s not how I present it.

Nobody will ever, organically, get the conclusion "oh behavior”.

People with triple digit IQs naturally make these conclusions. They’re called context clues. If it walks like a duck, shoot it during duck season.

.. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. .

[You are making your best guesses, AT BEST. I doubt you are 100% sure on your theory.]

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

P

He’s shilling against it.

On what aspects? Is he claiming the Trinity is false? That Jesus didn't exist?

Yes, which is why he lies about it.

That would mean he makes fact statements that contradict what he believes.

Wow, much conspiracy. Such evidence.

Great job not even pretending to construct a believable strawman.

Get f'd.

Hope I never do get [TERM UNUSABLE DUE TO EPHESIANS 4:29]'ed by some third worlder.

You didn’t even TRY to reply to what I said.

There's no graaaand conspiracy in my quote of his comment.

So you believe that begging the question and circular reasoning are two different fallacies?

So you beat your wife? Not playing your game. Try the fuck again with something someone actually said.

The way you present it

No, that’s not how I present it.

Nobody will ever, organically, get the conclusion "oh behavior”.

People with triple digit IQs naturally make these conclusions. They’re called context clues. If it walks like a duck, shoot it during duck season.

.. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. .

[You are making your best guesses, AT BEST. I doubt you are 100% sure on your theory.]

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

P

He’s shilling against it.

On what aspects? Is he claiming the Trinity is false? That Jesus didn't exist?

Yes, which is why he lies about it.

That would mean he makes fact statements that contradict what he believes.

Wow, much conspiracy. Such evidence.

Great job not even pretending to construct a believable strawman.

Get f'd.

Hope I never do get [TERM UNUSABLE DUE TO EPHESIANS 4:29]'ed by some third worlder.

You didn’t even TRY to reply to what I said.

So you believe that begging the question and circular reasoning are two different fallacies?

So you beat your wife? Not playing your game. Try the fuck again with something someone actually said.

The way you present it

No, that’s not how I present it.

Nobody will ever, organically, get the conclusion "oh behavior”.

People with triple digit IQs naturally make these conclusions. They’re called context clues. If it walks like a duck, shoot it during duck season.

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns. That’s the “somehow.”

Mmmm yes, because people are paid to shill for the True Worldview. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. And, not identical at all. Why would he be paid, why not free? People shill for free too.

You are making your best guesses, AT BEST. I doubt you are 100% sure on your theory.

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

"Because it's only the third intergalactic object ever discovered and because it's going so close to Mars while behind the sun that it could swing suddenly (but won't) so there's hypeability. The real conspiracy is that intergalactics prove young universe simply by their low count. Nobody's talking about that! Everyone's trying instead to get ahead of how intergalactics can prove a crazy Oort cloud or dark matter or other invented gods to patch gaps in the astrophysical model." ~SR

Wow, much conspiracy. Such evidence. (dogememe.jpg)

You have no idea what the fallacy even is.

So you believe that begging the question and circular reasoning are two different fallacies?

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns

The way you present it is as if it names SR by name in the article. Nobody will ever, organically, get the conclusion "oh behavior".

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns. That’s the “somehow.”

Mmmm yes, because people are paid to shill for the True Worldview. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. And, not identical at all. Why paid, why not free? People shill for free too.

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

"Because it's only the third intergalactic object ever discovered and because it's going so close to Mars while behind the sun that it could swing suddenly (but won't) so there's hypeability. The real conspiracy is that intergalactics prove young universe simply by their low count. Nobody's talking about that! Everyone's trying instead to get ahead of how intergalactics can prove a crazy Oort cloud or dark matter or other invented gods to patch gaps in the astrophysical model." ~SR

Wow, much conspiracy. Such evidence. (dogememe.jpg)

You have no idea what the fallacy even is.

So you believe that begging the question and circular reasoning are two different fallacies?

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns

The way you present it is as if it names SR by name in the article. Nobody will ever, organically, get the conclusion "oh behavior".

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns. That’s the “somehow.”

Mmmm yes, because people are paid to shill for the True Worldview. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. And, not identical at all. Why paid, why not free? People shill for free too.

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

"Because it's only the third intergalactic object ever discovered and because it's going so close to Mars while behind the sun that it could swing suddenly (but won't) so there's hypeability. The real conspiracy is that intergalactics prove young universe simply by their low count. Nobody's talking about that! Everyone's trying instead to get ahead of how intergalactics can prove a crazy Oort cloud or dark matter or other invented gods to patch gaps in the astrophysical model." ~SR

Wow, much conspiracy. Such evidence. (dogememe.jpg)

You have no idea what the fallacy even is.

So you believe that begging the question and circular reasoning are two different fallacies?

by linking articles that in no way prove SR out of BILLIONS is "paid".

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns

The way you present it is as if it names SR by name in the article. Nobody will ever, organically, get the conclusion "oh behavior".

"This somehow proves that SR out of BILLIONS of humans"

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns. That’s the “somehow.”

Mmmm yes, because people are paid to shill for the True Worldview. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. And, not identical at all. Why paid, why not free? People shill for free too.

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

"Because it's only the third intergalactic object ever discovered and because it's going so close to Mars while behind the sun that it could swing suddenly (but won't) so there's hypeability. The real conspiracy is that intergalactics prove young universe simply by their low count. Nobody's talking about that! Everyone's trying instead to get ahead of how intergalactics can prove a crazy Oort cloud or dark matter or other invented gods to patch gaps in the astrophysical model." ~SR

Wow, much conspiracy. Such evidence. (dogememe.jpg)

You have no idea what the fallacy even is.

So you believe that begging the question and circular reasoning are two different fallacies?

by linking articles that in no way prove SR out of BILLIONS is "paid".

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns

The way you present it is as if it names SR by name in the article. Nobody will ever, organically, get the conclusion "oh behavior".

"This somehow proves that SR out of BILLIONS of humans"

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns. That’s the “somehow.”

Mmmm yes, because people are paid to shill for the True Worldview. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. And, not identical at all. Why paid, why not free? People shill for free too.

how far do I have to scroll

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

"Because it's only the third intergalactic object ever discovered and because it's going so close to Mars while behind the sun that it could swing suddenly (but won't) so there's hypeability. The real conspiracy is that intergalactics prove young universe simply by their low count. Nobody's talking about that! Everyone's trying instead to get ahead of how intergalactics can prove a crazy Oort cloud or dark matter or other invented gods to patch gaps in the astrophysical model." ~SR

Wow, much conspiracy. Such evidence. (dogememe.jpg)

You have no idea what the fallacy even is.

So you believe that begging the question and circular reasoning are two different fallacies?

by linking articles that in no way prove SR out of BILLIONS is "paid".

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns

The way you present it is as if it names SR by name in the article. Nobody will ever, organically, get the conclusion "oh behavior".

"This somehow proves that SR out of BILLIONS of humans"

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns. That’s the “somehow.”

Mmmm yes, because people are paid to shill for the True Worldview. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. And, not identical at all. Why paid, why not free? People shill for free too.

how far do I have to scroll

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

"Because it's only the third intergalactic object ever discovered and because it's going so close to Mars while behind the sun that it could swing suddenly (but won't) so there's hypeability. The real conspiracy is that intergalactics prove young universe simply by their low count. Nobody's talking about that! Everyone's trying instead to get ahead of how intergalactics can prove a crazy Oort cloud or dark matter or other invented gods to patch gaps in the astrophysical model." ~SR

Wow, much conspiracy. Such evidence. (dogememe.jpg)

you JUST used that EXACT fallacy

You have no idea what the fallacy even is.

by linking articles that in no way prove SR out of BILLIONS is "paid".

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns

"This somehow proves that SR out of BILLIONS of humans"

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns. That’s the “somehow.”

Mmmm yes, because people are paid to shill for the True Worldview. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. And, not identical at all. Why paid, why not free? People shill for free too.

how far do I have to scroll

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

"Because it's only the third intergalactic object ever discovered and because it's going so close to Mars while behind the sun that it could swing suddenly (but won't) so there's hypeability. The real conspiracy is that intergalactics prove young universe simply by their low count. Nobody's talking about that! Everyone's trying instead to get ahead of how intergalactics can prove a crazy Oort cloud or dark matter or other invented gods to patch gaps in the astrophysical model."

Wow, much conspiracy. Such evidence. (dogememe.jpg)

you JUST used that EXACT fallacy

You have no idea what the fallacy even is.

by linking articles that in no way prove SR out of BILLIONS is "paid".

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns

"Because it's only the third intergalactic object ever discovered and because it's going so close to Mars while behind the sun that it could swing suddenly (but won't) so there's hypeability."

"The real conspiracy is that intergalactics prove young universe simply by their low count. Nobody's talking about that! Everyone's trying instead to get ahead of how intergalactics can prove a crazy Oort cloud or dark matter or other invented gods to patch gaps in the astrophysical model."