The Council of Nicaea didn't determine canon, it was to discuss a specific theological problem. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YgbbHzzOvk8

The Catholic Church added books to their canon AFTER the reformation began. They were long considered important writings containing some history but NOT INSPIRED. Rome deciding later on that they are inspired doesn't make them so.

If the ancient Hebrews didn't treat the Apocrypha as scripture, and most early Christians said they weren't,why would you then take 16th century Rome's word for it? That's silly. https://pastorunlikely.com/did-martin-luther-remove-books-from-the-bible-a-pastors-answer/

Jerome was a church leader in the late 300’s. He was commissioned by the Bishop of Rome to create the Latin Vulgate. This was the “official” translation into Latin of whole Bible. Jerome did not believe the Apocrypha were inspired. He agreed that the Jewish people in Israel never treated them as Scripture. He acknowledged they had not changed that position.

[Jerome] included the Apocrypha in the Bible.. [but he] wrote introductions to each of them indicating they were helpful but not Scripture.

True Christians who left Rome can rely on 2000 years of scholarship (and prior to that Hebrew scholarship) regarding what is Scripture. We don't need pedophiles in robes telling us they got it wrong.

The Council of Nicaea didn't determine canon, it was to discuss a specific theological problem. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YgbbHzzOvk8

The Catholic Church added books to their canon AFTER the reformation began. They were long considered important writings containing some history but NOT INSPIRED. Rome deciding later on that they are inspired doesn't make them so.

If the ancient Hebrews didn't treat the Apocrypha as scripture, and most early Christians said they weren't,why would you then take 16th century Rome's word for it? That's silly. https://pastorunlikely.com/did-martin-luther-remove-books-from-the-bible-a-pastors-answer/

Jerome was a church leader in the late 300’s. He was commissioned by the Bishop of Rome to create the Latin Vulgate. This was the “official” translation into Latin of whole Bible. Jerome did not believe the Apocrypha were inspired. He agreed that the Jewish people in Israel never treated them as Scripture. He acknowledged they had not changed that position.

[Jerome] included the Apocrypha in the Bible.. [but he] wrote introductions to each of them indicating they were helpful but not Scripture.

The Council of Nicaea didn't determine Canon, it was to discuss a specific theological problem. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YgbbHzzOvk8

The Catholic Church added books to canon AFTER the reformation began. They were long considered important writings containing some history but NOT INSPIRED. Rome deciding later on that they are inspired doesn't make them so.

If the ancient Hebrews didn't treat the Apocrypha as scripture, and most early Christians said they weren't,why would you then take 16th century Rome's word for it? That's silly. https://pastorunlikely.com/did-martin-luther-remove-books-from-the-bible-a-pastors-answer/

Jerome was a church leader in the late 300’s. He was commissioned by the Bishop of Rome to create the Latin Vulgate. This was the “official” translation into Latin of whole Bible. Jerome did not believe the Apocrypha were inspired. He agreed that the Jewish people in Israel never treated them as Scripture. He acknowledged they had not changed that position.

[Jerome] included the Apocrypha in the Bible.. [but he] wrote introductions to each of them indicating they were helpful but not Scripture.

The Council of Nicaea didn't determine Canon, it was to discuss a specific theological problem. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YgbbHzzOvk8

The Catholic Church added books to canon AFTER the reformation began. They were long considered important writings containing some history but NOT INSPIRED. Rome deciding later on that they are inspired doesn't make them so.

If the ancient Hebrews didn't treat the Apocrypha as scripture, and most early Christians said they weren't,why would you then take 16th century Rome's word for it? That's silly. https://pastorunlikely.com/did-martin-luther-remove-books-from-the-bible-a-pastors-answer/

Jerome was a church leader in the late 300’s. He was commissioned by the Bishop of Rome to create the Latin Vulgate. This was the “official” translation into Latin of whole Bible. Jerome did not believe the Apocrypha were inspired. He agreed that the Jewish people in Israel never treated them as Scripture. He acknowledged they had not changed that position.

[Jerome] included the Apocrypha in the Bible.. [but, he] wrote introductions to each of them indicating they were helpful but not Scripture.

The Council of Nicaea didn't determine Canon, it was to discuss a specific theological problem. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YgbbHzzOvk8

The Catholic Church added books to canon AFTER the reformation began. They were long considered important writings containing some history but NOT INSPIRED. Rome deciding later on that they are inspired doesn't make them so.

If the ancient Hebrews didn't treat the Apocrypha as scripture, and most early Christians said they weren't,why would you then take 16th century Rome's word for it? That's silly. https://pastorunlikely.com/did-martin-luther-remove-books-from-the-bible-a-pastors-answer/

Jerome was a church leader in the late 300’s. He was commissioned by the Bishop of Rome to create the Latin Vulgate. This was the “official” translation into Latin of whole Bible. Jerome did not believe the Apocrypha were inspired. He agreed that the Jewish people in Israel never treated them as Scripture. He acknowledged they had not changed that position.

The Council of Nicaea didn't determine Canon, it was to discuss a specific theological problem. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YgbbHzzOvk8

The Catholic Church added books to canon AFTER the reformation began. They were long considered important writings containing some history but NOT INSPIRED. Rome deciding later on that they are inspired doesn't make them so.

If the ancient Hebrews didn't treat the Apocrypha as scripture, and most early Christians said they weren't,why would you then take 16th century Rome's word for it? That's silly. https://pastorunlikely.com/did-martin-luther-remove-books-from-the-bible-a-pastors-answer/

The Council of Nicaea didn't determine Canon, it was to discuss a specific theological problem. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YgbbHzzOvk8

The Catholic Church added books to canon AFTER the reformation began. They were long considered important writings containing some history but NOT INSPIRED. Rome decided later on that they are inspired doesn't make them so.

If the ancient Hebrews didn't treat the Apocrypha as scripture, and most early Christians said they weren't,why would you then take 16th century Rome's word for it? That's silly. https://pastorunlikely.com/did-martin-luther-remove-books-from-the-bible-a-pastors-answer/

The Council of Nicaea didn't determine Canon, it was to discuss a specific theological problem. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YgbbHzzOvk8

The Catholic Church added books to canon AFTER the reformation began. They were long considered important writings containing some history but NOT INSPIRED. Rome decided later on that they are inspired doesn't make them so.

If the ancient Hebrews didn't treat the Apocrypha as scripture, and early Christians said they weren't,why would you then take 16th century Rome's word for it? That's silly. https://pastorunlikely.com/did-martin-luther-remove-books-from-the-bible-a-pastors-answer/