Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Am a big fan of your posts, and this is amazing.

According to Wikipedia, 120 "Parker"s for every 100,000 people. So a probability of 0.0012 for each "Parker". Even giving one free-bee, still leaves say four (4) Parkers invading the space like space invaders:

      (120/100000)^4
     = .00000000000207360000
     = 2.0736×10−12

unlikely by only chance. I think we all - most of us - can agree that 2 in a trillion could be called "unlikely".

Even if there are 30 opportunities for "random" surnames here ...

Of course, your whole point is that this is not by chance. I get that.

1 day ago
2 score
Reason: math error

Am a big fan of your posts, and this is amazing.

According to Wikipedia, 120 "Parker"s for every 100,000 people. So a probability of 0.0012 for each "Parker". Even giving one free-bee, still leaves say four (4) Parkers invading the space like space invaders:

      (120/100000)^4
     = .00000000000207360000
     = 2.0736×10−12

unlikely by only chance. I think we all - most of us - can agree that 2 in a trillion could be called "unlikely".

Of course, your whole point is that this is not by chance. I get that.

1 day ago
2 score
Reason: Original

Am a big fan of your posts, and this is amazing.

According to wikipedia, 220 Parkers for every 100,000 people. So a probablility of 0.002 for each Parker. Even giving one free-bee, still leaves say four (4) Parkers invading the space like space invaders:

      (220/100000)^4
     = .00000000002342560000

unlikely by only chance.

Of course, your whole point is that this is not by chance. I get that.

1 day ago
1 score