I see where you are coming from, although we are talking across each other.

My question was not whether or not elections are real or rigged or hoaxes or if the winner mattered. My question was who would come out as the torch holder.

You are fundamentally correct in that election speculation inherently makes no difference. The agenda will continue regardless, and the results have already been decided and concluded regardless. I don’t disagree with your conclusion either.

However, as you alluded to, those on this site are here because they question things and seek truth, which exists on different planes of significance. My post was focused on a microcosm within a broader macrocosm. A macrocosm upon which your response is focused.

There is always a broader picture to consider, however that does not mean that speculation on all levels does not matter. The examples I provided substantiate that point, in the grand scheme of things, speculating upon them isn’t going to change anything, regardless of how much truth is known. Does that mean they don’t matter? Your response suggests otherwise.

When it comes to things that are outside of our control, knowing whether or not they exist, are real or are hoaxes or whatever ultimately changes nothing, but that does not mean that questions should not be asked or that answers on all planes should not be sought out regardless of their perceived significance.

I see where you are coming from, although we are talking across each other.

My question was not whether or not elections are real or rigged or hoaxes or if the winner mattered. My question was who would come out as the torch holder.

You are fundamentally correct in that election speculation inherently makes no difference. The agenda will continue regardless, and the results have already been decided and concluded regardless. I don’t disagree with your conclusion either.

However, as you alluded to, those on this site are here because they question things and seek truth, which exists on different planes of significance. My post was focused on a microcosm within a broader macrocosm. A macrocosm upon which your response is focused.

There is always a broader picture to consider, however that does not mean that speculation on all levels does not matter. The examples I provided substantiate that point, in the grand scheme of things, speculating upon them isn’t going to change anything, regardless of how much truth is known. Does that mean they don’t matter? Your response suggests otherwise.

When it comes to things that are outside of our control, knowing whether or not they exist, are real or are hoaxes or whatever ultimately changes nothing, but that does not mean that questions should not be asked.