Those examples are random people, not executives and officials.
How do you know that? There is nothing about who they were in articles. IDK, if it is some cultural difference or whatever, to not mention past and present occupations in reports on accidents in USA. Privacy or whatever. It is up to you to find out who they were.
Also, why do you separate executives and officials from random people? Are they somehow special and it is absolutely impossible for them to suicide themselves falling from window?
This few examples is just what I get from a minute search in Google. Imagine how many you will eventually find if you thoroughly check all US local press and other sources. For decade there will be hundreds if not thousands of those who died falling from window in USA. There is no way there will be no any CEOs, officials or whatever you account as "special" in that list.
Why don't you just admit being wrong instead of digging yourself in deeper?
Wrong in what exactly? Asking unintended questions about article in MSM?
You are still denying any conversation about why exactly this nobodies mentioned in this article (and many other) are so important for both Putin (to organize their asassination) and Western press (to circle that list for years). Why are you evading that conversation?
Those examples are random people, not executives and officials.
How do you know that? There is nothing about who they were in articles. It is up to you to find out who they were.
Also, why do you separate executives and officials from random people? Are they somehow special and it is absolutely impossible for them to suicide themselves falling from window?
This few examples is just what I get from a minute search in Google. Imagine how many you will eventually find if you thoroughly check all US local press and other sources. For decade there will be hundreds if not thousands of those who died falling from window in USA. There is no way there will be no any CEOs, officials or whatever you account as "special" in that list.
Why don't you just admit being wrong instead of digging yourself in deeper?
Wrong in what exactly? Asking unintended questions about article in MSM?
You are still denying any conversation about why exactly this nobodies mentioned in this article (and many other) are so important for both Putin (to organize their asassination) and Western press (to circle that list for years). Why are you evading that conversation?
Those examples are random people, not executives and officials.
How do you know that? There is nothing about who they are in articles. It is up to you to find out who they were.
Also, why do you separate executives and officials from random people? Are they somehow special and it is absolutely impossible for them to suicide themselves falling from window?
This few examples is just what I get from a minute search in Google. Imagine how many you will eventually find if you thoroughly check all US local press and other sources. For decade there will be hundreds if not thousands of those who died falling from window in USA. There is no way there will be no any CEOs, officials or whatever you account as "special" in that list.
Why don't you just admit being wrong instead of digging yourself in deeper?
Wrong in what exactly? Asking unintended questions about article in MSM?
You are still denying any conversation about why exactly this nobodies mentioned in this article (and many other) are so important for both Putin (to organize their asassination) and Western press (to circle that list for years). Why are you evading that conversation?