r/atheism tier post.

They believe in a book that were not witness to and do not not have objective knowledge of what, who and when was it written. All they have is internet evidence of something, somewhere, someplace said so. Objective knowledge is thus nil.

If that's your epistemic standard you shouldn't believe in anything written before you were born because you lack first-hand "objective knowledge". The Bible is the most well attested book in history and we know who wrote it and who compiled it too. If you want to be skeptical of the authorship you could be, but apply the same standard to all the ancient literature also. Did you know the oldest surviving Plato manuscript is from around 9th c. AD - that's 1500 years after his time?

The irony is you probably believe in the evolutionary myth just like other great skeptics who have seen through the lies of Christianity like Adam Green. Somehow, you have no problem ascertaining what happened 300 million years ago because "experts" found bones and contrived a model to date them, that happens to agree with the presuppositions of their theory. No way to verify any of this through the scientific method - just trust the science bro!

r/atheism tier post.

They believe in a book that were not witness to and do not not have objective knowledge of what, who and when was it written. All they have is internet evidence of something, somewhere, someplace said so. Objective knowledge is thus nil.

If that's your epistemic standard you shouldn't believe in anything written before you were born because you lack first-hand "objective knowledge". The Bible is the most well attested book in history and we know who wrote it and who compiled it too. If you want to be skeptical of the authorship you could be, but apply the same standard to all the ancient literature also. Did you know the oldest surviving Plato manuscript is from around 9th c. AD - that's 1500 years after his time?

The irony is you probably believe in the evolutionary myth just like other great skeptics like Adam Green. Somehow, you have no problem ascertaining what happened 300 million years ago because "experts" found bones and contrived a model to date them, that happens to agree with the presuppositions of their theory. No way to verify any of this through the scientific method - just trust the science bro!

r/atheism tier post.

They believe in a book that were not witness to and do not not have objective knowledge of what, who and when was it written. All they have is internet evidence of something, somewhere, someplace said so. Objective knowledge is thus nil.

If that's your epistemic standard you shouldn't believe in anything written before you were born because you lack first-hand "objective knowledge". The Bible is the most well attested book in history and we know who wrote it and who compiled it too. If you want to be skeptical of the authorship you could be, but apply the same standard to all the ancient literature also. Did you know the oldest surviving Plato manuscript is from around 9th c. AD - that's 1500 years after his time?