nothing wrong with questioning shit but if "300 most populous cities only accounts for 20% of population" is the crux of the argument that's retarded.

"we're expected to believe the remaining 80% is to be found in all the towns and villages?"

uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... yes?

but for anyone who hasn't travelled much i can understand how it can get confusing

nothing wrong with questioning shit but if "300 most populous cities only accounts for 20% of population" is the crux of the argument that's retarded.

but for anyone who hasn't travelled much i can understand how it can get confusing

nothing wrong with questioning shit but if "300 most populous cities only accounts for 20% of population" is the crux of the argument that's retarded