What is Christianity?

According to you it's whatever you want it to be, because you can interpret it any way you please, and redefine any of the words to mean anything you want.

Ohh and you also get to cherry pick which version of the bible you're reading from too!

And on that note, I don't see the point in engaging in a theological debate with someone who doesn't believe in theology in the first place, because I don't believe in it either, just for different reasons.

Perhaps you don't believe the Big Bang Theory in its supernatural first instant?

I don't recall ever professing belief in the big bang theory.... Which is not actually a scientific theory because there's no way to test it.

What is Christianity?

According to you it's whatever you want it to be, because you can interpret it any way you please, and redefine any of the words to mean anything you want.

Ohh and you also get to cherry pick which version of the bible you're reading from too!

And on that note, I don't see the point in engaging in a theological debate with someone who doesn't believe in theology in the first place, because I don't believe in it either, just for different reasons.

Perhaps you don't believe the Big Bang Theory in its supernatural first instant?

I don't recall ever professing belief in the big bang theory.... Which is not actually a scientific theory because there's no way to test it.

Either BBT is supernatural and "fairytale" and "stupid" just like special creation, or (more likely) there are epistemological evidentiary criteria to judge the best explanation.

There is an observed phenomena that is very real, and that is the fact that the distance between celestial objects is constantly expanding.

This is an undeniable fact that can be observed in reality, and it can be tested.

The big bang theory is attempting to explain what may have set such circumstances in motion. I don't profess acceptance or belief in this theory, but that doesn't mean I can deny the fact that an expanding universe was smaller 14 billion years ago.

That's just basic logic at that point. If the universe is going to be bigger tomorrow, then that means yesterday it was smaller.

Why it's doing that and what caused it, I will not pretend to know, and I will refer you back to my earlier comment where I said you don't get to know something just because you want to know.

What is Christianity?

According to you it's whatever you want it to be, because you can interpret it any way you please, and redefine any of the words to mean anything you want.

Ohh and you also get to cherry pick which version of the bible you're reading from too!

And on that note, I don't see the point in engaging in a theological debate with someone who doesn't believe in theology in the first place, because I don't believe in it either, just for different reasons.

Perhaps you don't believe the Big Bang Theory in its supernatural first instant?

I don't recall ever professing belief in the big bang theory.... Which is not actually a scientific theory because there's no way to test it.

Either BBT is supernatural and "fairytale" and "stupid" just like special creation, or (more likely) there are epistemological evidentiary criteria to judge the best explanation.

There is an observed phenomena that is very real, and that is the fact that the distance between celestial objects is constantly expanding.

This is an undeniable fact that can be observed in reality, and it can be tested.

The big bang theory is attempting to explain what may have set such circumstances in motion. I don't profess acceptance or belief in this theory, but that doesn't mean I can deny the fact that an expanding universe was smaller 14 billion years ago.

That's just basic logic at that point. If the universe is going to be bigger tomorrow, then that means yesterday it was smaller.

What is Christianity?

According to you it's whatever you want it to be, because you can interpret it any way you please, and redefine any of the words to mean anything you want.

Ohh and you also get to cherry pick which version of the bible you're reading from too!

And on that note, I don't see the point in engaging in a theological debate with someone who doesn't believe in theology in the first place, because I don't believe in it either, just for different reasons.

Perhaps you don't believe the Big Bang Theory in its supernatural first instant?

I don't recall ever professing belief in the big bang theory.... Which is not actually a scientific theory because there's no way to test it.

Either BBT is supernatural and "fairytale" and "stupid" just like special creation, or (more likely) there are epistemological evidentiary criteria to judge the best explanation.

There is an observed phenomena that is very real, and that is the fact that the distance between celestial objects is constantly expanding.

This is an undeniable fact that can be observed in reality, and it can be tested.

The big bang theory is attempting to explain what may have set such circumstances in motion. I don't profess acceptance or belief in this theory, but that doesn't mean I can deny the fact that an expanding universe was smaller 14 billion years ago than it will be 14 billion years from now.

That's just basic logic at that point. If the universe is going to be bigger tomorrow, then that means yesterday it was smaller.

What is Christianity?

According to you it's whatever you want it to be, because you can interpret it any way you please, and redefine any of the words to mean anything you want.

And on that note, I don't see the point in engaging in a theological debate with someone who doesn't believe in theology in the first place, because I don't believe in it either, just for different reasons.

Perhaps you don't believe the Big Bang Theory in its supernatural first instant?

I don't recall ever professing belief in the big bang theory.... Which is not actually a scientific theory because there's no way to test it.

Either BBT is supernatural and "fairytale" and "stupid" just like special creation, or (more likely) there are epistemological evidentiary criteria to judge the best explanation.

There is an observed phenomena that is very real, and that is the fact that the distance between celestial objects is constantly expanding.

This is an undeniable fact that can be observed in reality, and it can be tested.

The big bang theory is attempting to explain what may have set such circumstances in motion. I don't profess acceptance or belief in this theory, but that doesn't mean I can deny the fact that an expanding universe was smaller 14 billion years ago than it will be 14 billion years from now.

That's just basic logic at that point. If the universe is going to be bigger tomorrow, then that means yesterday it was smaller.

What is Christianity?

According to you it's whatever you want it to be, because you can interpret it any way you please, and redefine any of the words to mean anything you want.

And on that note, I don't see the point in engaging in a theological debate with someone who doesn't believe in theology in the first place, because I don't believe in it either, just for different reasons.

Perhaps you don't believe the Big Bang Theory in its supernatural first instant?

I don't recall ever professing belief in the big bang theory.... Which is not actually a scientific theory because there's no way to test it.

Either BBT is supernatural and "fairytale" and "stupid" just like special creation, or (more likely) there are epistemological evidentiary criteria to judge the best explanation.

There is an observed phenomena that is very real, and that is the fact that the distance between celestial objects is constantly expanding.

This is an undeniable fact that can be observed in reality, and it can be tested.

The big bang theory is attempting to explain what may have set such circumstances in motion. I don't profess acceptance or belief in this theory, but that doesn't mean I can deny the fact that an expanding universe was smaller 14 billion years ago than it will be 14 billion years from now.

What is Christianity?

According to you it's whatever you want it to be, because you can interpret it any way you please, and redefine any of the words to mean anything you want.

And on that note, I don't see the point in engaging in a theological debate with someone who doesn't believe in theology in the first place, because I don't believe in it either, just for different reasons.

Perhaps you don't believe the Big Bang Theory in its supernatural first instant?

I don't recall ever professing belief in the big bang theory.... Which is not actually a theory, but rather an unproven hypothesis.

Either BBT is supernatural and "fairytale" and "stupid" just like special creation, or (more likely) there are epistemological evidentiary criteria to judge the best explanation.

There is an observed phenomena that is very real, and that is the fact that the distance between celestial objects is constantly expanding.

This is an undeniable fact that can be observed in reality.

The big bang theory is attempting to explain what may have set such circumstances in motion. I don't profess acceptance or belief in this theory, but that doesn't mean I can deny the fact that an expanding universe was smaller 14 billion years ago than it will be 14 billion years from now.

What is Christianity?

According to you it's whatever you want it to be, because you can interpret it any way you please, and redefine any of the words to mean anything you want.

And on that note, I don't see the point in engaging in a theological debate with someone who doesn't believe in theology in the first place, because I don't believe in it either, just for different reasons.

Perhaps you don't believe the Big Bang Theory in its supernatural first instant?

I don't recall ever professing belief in the big bang theory.... Which is not actually a theory, but rather an unproven hypothesis.