"No problem" means "it's not my problem".

Interestingly enough, that's the same way I feel about you wasting your life being in love with a fairy tale.

It's not my problem.

You started with a reasonable question and I indicated how reasonable people can come to agreed interpretations of unclear ancient texts.

Talking about areas where people do agree is avoiding the question which was about the areas where they don't agree.

The question was is it a problem for the "bible only" approach to Christianity when people disagree on interpretations, or is it okay if every Christian has their own personalized version of it?

"No problem" means "it's not my problem".

Interestingly enough, that's the same way I feel about you wasting your life being in love with a fairy tale.

It's not my problem.

You started with a reasonable question and I indicated how reasonable people can come to agreed interpretations of unclear ancient texts.

Talking about areas where people do agree is avoiding the question about the areas where they don't.

The question was is it a problem for the "bible only" approach to Christianity when people disagree on interpretations, or is it okay if every Christian has their own personalized version of it?

"No problem" means "it's not my problem".

Interestingly enough, that's the same way I feel about you wasting your life being in love with a fairy tale.

It's not my problem.

You started with a reasonable question and I indicated how reasonable people can come to agreed interpretations of unclear ancient texts.

Talking about areas where people do agree is avoiding the question about the areas where they don't.

The question was is it a problem for the "bible only" approach to Christianity when people disagree on interpretations, or is it okay if every Christian has their own personalized version of it?

"No problem" means "it's not my problem".

Interestingly enough, that's the same way I feel about you wasting your life being in love with a fairy tale.

It's not my problem.

You started with a reasonable question and I indicated how reasonable people can come to agreed interpretations of unclear ancient texts.

I must've missed that part where you answered my question, or perhaps you misunderstood it.

The question was is it a problem for the "bible only" approach to Christianity when people disagree on interpretations, or is it okay if every Christian has their own personalized version of it?

Talking about areas where people do agree is avoiding the question about the areas where they don't.