The beauty of Professor Dingle's fatal criticism of special relativity theory is its simplicity. Much like the innocent child in Andersen's story one need not be an expert to understand it (or a mathematician). Neither does one need more than an elementary understanding of physics. All one really needs is a mind capable of reason. Specifically, one needs a mind capable of knowing the difference between the impossible and the possible - not as a matter of subjective opinion, but as a matter of logical necessity.

It was Dingle's arguments (as well as Percival) that helped me see that our intuition is right, and this theory makes no fracking sense. It's like the midwit meme, on the ignorant side you're like "this makes no sense" in the middle you rationalize it with a bunch of arguments and on the adept side you say "this makes no sense"

I'm glad I never studied it much in college because I would have probably tried to convince myself of it.

The beauty of Professor Dingle's fatal criticism of special relativity theory is its simplicity. Much like the innocent child in Andersen's story one need not be an expert to understand it (or a mathematician). Neither does one need more than an elementary understanding of physics. All one really needs is a mind capable of reason. Specifically, one needs a mind capable of knowing the difference between the impossible and the possible - not as a matter of subjective opinion, but as a matter of logical necessity.

It was Dingle's arguments (as well as Percival) that helped me see that our intuition is right, and this theory made no fracking sense. It's like the midwit meme, on the ignorant side you're like "this makes no sense" in the middle you rationalize it with a bunch of arguments and on the adept side you say "this makes no sense"

I'm glad I never studied it much in college because I would have probably tried to convince myself of it.

The beauty of Professor Dingle's fatal criticism of special relativity theory is its simplicity. Much like the innocent child in Andersen's story one need not be an expert to understand it (or a mathematician). Neither does one need more than an elementary understanding of physics. All one really needs is a mind capable of reason. Specifically, one needs a mind capable of knowing the difference between the impossible and the possible - not as a matter of subjective opinion, but as a matter of logical necessity.

It was Dingle's arguments (as well as Percival) that helped me see that our intuition is right, and this theory made no fracking sense. It's like the midwit meme, on the ignorant side you're like "this makes no sense" in the middle you rationalize it with a bunch of proofs and on the adept side you say "this makes no sense"

I'm glad I never studied it much in college because I would have probably tried to convince myself of it.

The beauty of Professor Dingle's fatal criticism of special relativity theory is its simplicity. Much like the innocent child in Andersen's story one need not be an expert to understand it (or a mathematician). Neither does one need more than an elementary understanding of physics. All one really needs is a mind capable of reason. Specifically, one needs a mind capable of knowing the difference between the impossible and the possible - not as a matter of subjective opinion, but as a matter of logical necessity.

It was Dingle's arguments that helped me see that our intuition is right, and this theory made no fracking sense. It's like the midwit meme, on the ignorant side you're like "this makes no sense" in the middle you rationalize it with a bunch of proofs and on the adept side you say "this makes no sense"

I'm glad I never studied it much in college because I would have probably tried to convince myself of it.

The beauty of Professor Dingle's fatal criticism of special relativity theory is its simplicity. Much like the innocent child in Andersen's story one need not be an expert to understand it (or a mathematician). Neither does one need more than an elementary understanding of physics. All one really needs is a mind capable of reason. Specifically, one needs a mind capable of knowing the difference between the impossible and the possible - not as a matter of subjective opinion, but as a matter of logical necessity.

It was Dingle's arguments that helped me see that my intuition was right, and this theory made no fracking sense. I'm glad I never studied it much in college because I would have probably tried to convince myself of it.