Thank you for researching those!
The first claim is based on technology that I read about in a science news article many years ago, yet now seems to no longer exist online.
The idea is that a two-part shot can be made where the first shot makes it so that a second shot is deadly. People who did not get shot A will not experience death as a result of shot B.
So the claim was not that people will die in two years. It was speculation that, "...you’ll line up and get your top-up vaccines and, in a few months, or a year or so later you’ll die of some, you know, peculiar explicable syndrome and they won’t be able to associate it with the top up vaccines."
The second claim is that people over 70 who get the shots will "probably...die withing about two to three years." I believe that a large number of people over 70 will die in about two to three years from natural causes.
Part two of the second claim affects the rest of us: that life expectancy will be reduced so that a person in their 30s would die within five or ten years - not two.
Why is it that the experts in the entire news media on the other side of the debate are allowed to be wrong about so much while the most extreme predictions from a very small number of people are intolerable and evidence that millions of people believe weird things?
Here is a prediction from her in 2021.
Anti-vaccination campaigner Dolores Cahill no longer employed by UCD https://www.irishtimes.com/news/education/anti-vaccination-campaigner-dolores-cahill-no-longer-employed-by-ucd-1.4678280
Controversial academic said children who wore face masks would have a lower IQ
Ironic, wouldn't you say?
Thank you for researching those!
The first claim is based on technology that I read about in a science news article many years ago, yet now seems to no longer exist online.
The idea is that a two-part shot can be made where the first shot makes it so that a second shot is deadly. People who did not get shot A will not experience death as a result of shot B.
So the claim was not that people will die in two years. It was speculation that, "...you’ll line up and get your top-up vaccines and, in a few months, or a year or so later you’ll die of some, you know, peculiar explicable syndrome and they won’t be able to associate it with the top up vaccines."
The second claim is that people over 70 who get the shots will "probably...die withing about two to three years." I believe that a large number of people over 70 will die in about two to three years from natural causes.
Part two of the second claim affects the rest of us: that life expectancy will be reduced so that a person in their 30s would die within five or ten years - not two.
Why is it that the experts in the entire news media on the other side of the debate are allowed to be wrong about so much while the most extreme predictions from a very small number of people are intolerable and evidence that millions of people believe weird things?