In this thought experiment (and that's all it is, is imagination) whether or not the light hitting the woman happens at the same time is up to YOU the observer.
A woman (observer A) is seated in the center of a rail car, with two flash lamps at opposite sides equidistant from her. Multiple light rays that are emitted from the flash lamps move towards observer A, as shown with arrows....
Observer A moves with the lamps on the rail car as the rail car moves towards the right of observer B. Observer B receives the light flashes simultaneously, and sees the bulbs as both having flashed at the same time. However, he sees observer A receive the flash from the right first... Simultaneity, or whether different events occur at the same instant, depends on the frame of reference of the observer.
https://openstax.org/books/physics/pages/10-1-postulates-of-special-relativity
If your theory forces you to say such stupid things as this, you change the theory. How insane is the average person to let this stand for over 100 years?
But it's no wonder, if this was allowed to stand in physics of all places, that this idea made its way into social sciences and philosophy. Now your "truth" is the "truth", and it's a "sin" to say otherwise. We're just outside observers right? So how could we possibly know the truth from their "frame"? Maybe because God says what the truth is, not the individual observing it.
In this thought experiment (and that's all it is, is imagination) whether or not the light hitting the woman happens at the same time is up to YOU the observer.
A woman (observer A) is seated in the center of a rail car, with two flash lamps at opposite sides equidistant from her. Multiple light rays that are emitted from the flash lamps move towards observer A, as shown with arrows....
Observer A moves with the lamps on the rail car as the rail car moves towards the right of observer B. Observer B receives the light flashes simultaneously, and sees the bulbs as both having flashed at the same time. However, he sees observer A receive the flash from the right first... Simultaneity, or whether different events occur at the same instant, depends on the frame of reference of the observer.
https://openstax.org/books/physics/pages/10-1-postulates-of-special-relativity
If your theory forces you to say such stupid things as this, you change the theory. How insane is the average person to let this stand for over 100 years?
But it's no wonder if this was allowed to stand in physics of all places, that this idea made its way into social sciences and philosophy. Now your "truth" is the "truth", and it's a "sin" to say otherwise. We're just outside observers right? So how could we possibly know the truth from their "frame"? Maybe because God says what the truth is, not the individual observing it.
In this thought experiment (and that's all it is, is imagination) whether or not the light hitting the woman happens at the same time is up to YOU the observer.
A woman (observer A) is seated in the center of a rail car, with two flash lamps at opposite sides equidistant from her. Multiple light rays that are emitted from the flash lamps move towards observer A, as shown with arrows....
Observer A moves with the lamps on the rail car as the rail car moves towards the right of observer B. Observer B receives the light flashes simultaneously, and sees the bulbs as both having flashed at the same time. However, he sees observer A receive the flash from the right first... Simultaneity, or whether different events occur at the same instant, depends on the frame of reference of the observer.
https://openstax.org/books/physics/pages/10-1-postulates-of-special-relativity
If your theory forces you to say such stupid things as this, you change the theory. How insane is the average person to let this stand for over 100 years?
But it's no wonder, if this was allowed to stand in physics of all places, that this idea made its way into social sciences and philosophy. Now your "truth" is the "truth", and it's a "sin" to say otherwise. We're just outside observers right? So how could we possibly know the truth from their "frame"? Maybe because God says what the truth is, not the individual observing it.
In this thought experiment (and that's all it is, is imagination) whether or not the light hitting the woman happens at the same time is up to YOU the observer.
A woman (observer A) is seated in the center of a rail car, with two flash lamps at opposite sides equidistant from her. Multiple light rays that are emitted from the flash lamps move towards observer A, as shown with arrows....
Observer A moves with the lamps on the rail car as the rail car moves towards the right of observer B. Observer B receives the light flashes simultaneously, and sees the bulbs as both having flashed at the same time. However, he sees observer A receive the flash from the right first... Simultaneity, or whether different events occur at the same instant, depends on the frame of reference of the observer.
https://openstax.org/books/physics/pages/10-1-postulates-of-special-relativity
If your theory forces you to say such stupid things as this, you change the theory. How insane is the average person to let this stand for over 100 years?
But it's no wonder, if this was allowed to stand in physics of all places, that this idea made its way into social sciences and philosophy. Now your "truth" is the "truth", and it's a "sin" to say otherwise. We're just outside observers right? So how could we possibly know the truth from their "frame"? Gee maybe because God says what the truth is, not the individual observing it.
In this thought experiment (and that's all it is, is imagination) whether or not the light hitting the woman happens at the same time is up to YOU the observer.
A woman (observer A) is seated in the center of a rail car, with two flash lamps at opposite sides equidistant from her. Multiple light rays that are emitted from the flash lamps move towards observer A, as shown with arrows....
Observer A moves with the lamps on the rail car as the rail car moves towards the right of observer B. Observer B receives the light flashes simultaneously, and sees the bulbs as both having flashed at the same time. However, he sees observer A receive the flash from the right first... Simultaneity, or whether different events occur at the same instant, depends on the frame of reference of the observer.
https://openstax.org/books/physics/pages/10-1-postulates-of-special-relativity
If your theory forces you to say such stupid things as this, you change the theory. How insane is the average person to let this stand for over 100 years?
But it's no wonder, if this was allowed to stand in physics of all places, that this idea made its way into social sciences and philosophy. Now your "truth" is the "truth", and it's a "sin" to say otherwise. We're just outside observers right? So how could we possibly know the truth from their "frame"?
In this thought experiment (and that's all it is, is imagination) whether or not the light hitting the woman happens at the same time is up to YOU the observer.
A woman (observer A) is seated in the center of a rail car, with two flash lamps at opposite sides equidistant from her. Multiple light rays that are emitted from the flash lamps move towards observer A, as shown with arrows....
Observer A moves with the lamps on the rail car as the rail car moves towards the right of observer B. Observer B receives the light flashes simultaneously, and sees the bulbs as both having flashed at the same time. However, he sees observer A receive the flash from the right first... Simultaneity, or whether different events occur at the same instant, depends on the frame of reference of the observer.
https://openstax.org/books/physics/pages/10-1-postulates-of-special-relativity
If your theory forces you to say such stupid things are this, you change the theory. How insane is the average person to let this stand for over 100 years?
But it's no wonder, if this was allowed to stand in physics of all places, that this idea made its way into social sciences and philosophy. Now your "truth" is the "truth", and it's a "sin" to say otherwise. We're just outside observers right? So how could we possibly know the truth from their "frame"?
In this thought experiment (and that's all it is, is imagination) whether or not the light hitting the woman happens at the same time is up to YOU the observer.
A woman (observer A) is seated in the center of a rail car, with two flash lamps at opposite sides equidistant from her. Multiple light rays that are emitted from the flash lamps move towards observer A, as shown with arrows....
Observer A moves with the lamps on the rail car as the rail car moves towards the right of observer B. Observer B receives the light flashes simultaneously, and sees the bulbs as both having flashed at the same time. However, he sees observer A receive the flash from the right first... Simultaneity, or whether different events occur at the same instant, depends on the frame of reference of the observer.
If your theory forces you to say such stupid things are this, you change the theory. How insane is the average person to let this stand for over 100 years?
But it's no wonder, if this was allowed to stand in physics of all places, that this idea made its way into social sciences and philosophy. Now your "truth" is the "truth", and it's a "sin" to say otherwise. We're just outside observers right? So how could we possibly know the truth from their "frame"?
In this thought experiment (and that's all it is, is imagination) whether or not the light hitting the woman happens at the same time is up to YOU the observer.
A woman (observer A) is seated in the center of a rail car, with two flash lamps at opposite sides equidistant from her. Multiple light rays that are emitted from the flash lamps move towards observer A, as shown with arrows....
Observer A moves with the lamps on the rail car as the rail car moves towards the right of observer B. Observer B receives the light flashes simultaneously, and sees the bulbs as both having flashed at the same time. However, he sees observer A receive the flash from the right first... Simultaneity, or whether different events occur at the same instant, depends on the frame of reference of the observer.
If your theory forces you to say such stupid things are this, you change the theory. How insane is the average person to let this stand for over 100 years?
But it's no wonder, if this was allowed to stand in physics of all places that it made its way into social sciences and philosophy. Now your "truth" is your "truth", and it's a "sin" to call something the truth.