Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Thanks.

For the readers, there is a screenshot of a AI detection tool (Integrito, I think) that shows that 100% of the text is "likely" AI-generated. None of the text was in the "highly likely" category.

According to someone from XRVision (a small startup, I think these guys https://www.xrvision.com/ )

The original was AI-generated; the writer then did a ‘manual pass’ to clean it up and produced a handwritten version in order to give it more credence via:

  1. Writing a paper without lines so the text is skewed and is ‘more authentic’
  2. Post script correction of the case on the g in “Gun Violence”
  3. Introducing poor grammar like “Thank you for heading the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention and for years and President Biden’s push…)

EDIT: I believe it is unlikely that the Harris campaign would have engaged with this if they believed it was an AI-generated letter.

84 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Thanks.

For the readers, there is a screenshot of a AI detection tool (Integrito, I think) that shows that 100% of the text is "likely" AI-generated. None of the text was in the "highly likely" category.

According to someone from XRVision (a small startup, I think these guys https://www.xrvision.com/ )

The original was AI-generated; the writer then did a ‘manual pass’ to clean it up and produced a handwritten version in order to give it more credence via:

  1. Writing a paper without lines so the text is skewed and is ‘more authentic’
  2. Post script correction of the case on the g in “Gun Violence”
  3. Introducing poor grammar like “Thank you for heading the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention and for years and President Biden’s push…)

EDIT: I believe it is unlikely that the Harris campaign would have engaged with this if they believe it was an AI-generated letter.

84 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Thanks.

For the readers, there is a screenshot of a AI detection tool (Integrito, I think) that shows that 100% of the text is "likely" AI-generated. None of the text was in the "highly likely" category.

According to someone from XRVision (a small startup, I think these guys https://www.xrvision.com/ )

The original was AI-generated; the writer then did a ‘manual pass’ to clean it up and produced a handwritten version in order to give it more credence via:

  1. Writing a paper without lines so the text is skewed and is ‘more authentic’
  2. Post script correction of the case on the g in “Gun Violence”
  3. Introducing poor grammar like “Thank you for heading the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention and for years and President Biden’s push…)
84 days ago
1 score