Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

A particularly concerning buildup of microplastics in brain samples is highlighted in a study paper that is presently undergoing peer review and was released online by the National Institutes of Health.

They mean that NIH that lied about PCR "tests" and "pandemy" and continue to do that?

Applying pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) methods to isolate and quantify MNPs from human samples, we compared MNP accumulation in kidneys, livers, and brains.

So, they burn samples of human tissues (after heavy and questionable meddling with them, really, read the paper) and with mass-spectrometry on exhaust gasses make a conclusion that less than percent of that smoke is similar to a smoke from burning plastic. (and they use that "isolate" codeword again, when nothing was ever really isolated at all by definition).

Well, seems they even didn't understand that most tissues of our body are made from organic polymers, i.e. plastic, just natural one. Plastics, regardless of origin are made from the same organic "bricks", and so disintegrate under heat into same basic substances.

Also interesting, that in the list of studied plastics

  • Polyethylene (PE),
  • Polyvinyl chloride (PVC),
  • Nylon 66 (N66),
  • Styrene-butadiene (SBR),
  • Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS),
  • Polyethylene terephthalate (PET),
  • Nylon 6 (N6),
  • Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA),
  • Polyurethane (PU),
  • Polycarbonate (PC),
  • Polypropylene (PP),
  • Polystyrene (PS)

they didn't include plastics that built from organic blocks that never met in human body, like PTFE - Polytetrafluoroethylene AKA Teflon. And PTFE is used in plastics production heavily as temperature resistant and low-friction coating, so PTFE traces will present in nearly all plastics produced artificially and should be an interesting marker for artificiality of plastic that was pyrolysed. Fluoride and its compounds should not present in our body in any noticeable amount except for teeths and bones. And not in kidneys, brain and other soft tissues. But they suddenly strike out PTFE from their extensive list.

Also, they found that pyrolysis exhaust mostly contains molecules that similar to the pyrolysis exhaust of polyethilene and polypropylene. This plastics disintegrate into ethylene and propylene being heated (among simplier substances, of course, like CO, CH4, H2 and so on). Just like almost any biological tissue when pyrolised. Even while burning wood in a stove you will have few percents of etylene in a woodgas, f.e. That absolutely does not mean that wood you burn have a tons of polyethylene MiCroPlaStic!!!111 in it. :)

Again, cabal doomers trying to seed yet another fear in sheeple applying wrong methods in their "research" to make needed "scientific" conclusions. Just like they recently did ti using PCR that can't be used for testing to test people and create a non-existing pandemic.

27 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

A particularly concerning buildup of microplastics in brain samples is highlighted in a study paper that is presently undergoing peer review and was released online by the National Institutes of Health.

They mean that NIH that lied about PCR "tests" and "pandemy" and continue to do that?

Applying pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) methods to isolate and quantify MNPs from human samples, we compared MNP accumulation in kidneys, livers, and brains.

So, they burn samples of human tissues (after heavy and questionable meddling with them, really, read the paper) and with mass-spectrometry on exhaust gasses make a conclusion that less than percent of that smoke is similar to a smoke from burning plastic.

Well, seems they even didn't understand that most tissues of our body are made from organic polymers, i.e. plastic, just natural one. Plastics, regardless of origin are made from the same organic "bricks", and so disintegrate under heat into same basic substances.

Also interesting, that in the list of studied plastics

  • Polyethylene (PE),
  • Polyvinyl chloride (PVC),
  • Nylon 66 (N66),
  • Styrene-butadiene (SBR),
  • Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS),
  • Polyethylene terephthalate (PET),
  • Nylon 6 (N6),
  • Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA),
  • Polyurethane (PU),
  • Polycarbonate (PC),
  • Polypropylene (PP),
  • Polystyrene (PS)

they didn't include plastics that built from organic blocks that never met in human body, like PTFE - Polytetrafluoroethylene AKA Teflon. And PTFE is used in plastics production heavily as temperature resistant and low-friction coating, so PTFE traces will present in nearly all plastics produced artificially and should be an interesting marker for artificiality of plastic that was pyrolysed. Fluoride and its compounds should not present in our body in any noticeable amount except for teeths and bones. And not in kidneys, brain and other soft tissues. But they suddenly strike out PTFE from their extensive list.

Also, they found that pyrolysis exhaust mostly contains molecules that similar to the pyrolysis exhaust of polyethilene and polypropylene. This plastics disintegrate into ethylene and propylene being heated (among simplier substances, of course, like CO, CH4, H2 and so on). Just like almost any biological tissue when pyrolised. Even while burning wood in a stove you will have few percents of etylene in a woodgas, f.e. That absolutely does not mean that wood you burn have a tons of polyethylene MiCroPlaStic!!!111 in it. :)

Again, cabal doomers trying to seed yet another fear in sheeple applying wrong methods in their "research" to make needed "scientific" conclusions. Just like they recently did ti using PCR that can't be used for testing to test people and create a non-existing pandemic.

27 days ago
1 score