Would be nice if the ones publicizing the study wasn't Stew Peters affiliated. But the study itself doesn't appear to be from them necessarily.
In that "Final Days" film they focus a lot on Karen Kingston who pushes a lot of disinfo regarding patents. I've looked at the patents she mentions and she goes from truth to off the wall nonsense in her explanations of them. At 48:38 she claims that the sheet of graphene the sample sits on creates "new ionic bonds" that then create "millions of spike protein". She smirks as she says this because anyone with a working knowledge of chemistry knows that isn't a thing. https://rumble.com/v2r004k-final-days-worldwide-premiere.html
She knows that graphene is part of an analytical method being used on a sample and not used to generate anything.
However, all that being said, they could put out disinfo about GO (Graphene Oxide) only to debunk it, all the while actually using it. But if they've debunked it they've primed the minds of the masses to reject it as a "boy who cried wolf" technique.
Or perhaps it is a red herring as they use other materials which aren't being discussed.
Would be nice if the ones publicizing the study wasn't Stew Peters affiliated. But the study itself doesn't appear to be from them necessarily.
In that "Final Days" film they focus a lot on Karen Kingston who pushes a lot of disinfo regarding patents. I've looked at the patents she mentions and she goes from truth to off the wall nonsense in her explanations of them. At 48:38 she claims that the sheet of graphene the sample sits on creates "new ionic bonds" that then create "millions of spike protein". She smirks as she says this because anyone with a basic understanding of chemistry knows that isn't a thing. https://rumble.com/v2r004k-final-days-worldwide-premiere.html
She knows that graphene is part of an analytical method being used on a sample and not used to generate anything.
However, all that being said, they could put out disinfo about GO (Graphene Oxide) only to debunk it, all the while actually using it. But if they've debunked it they've primed the minds of the masses to reject it as a "boy who cried wolf" technique.
Or perhaps it is a red herring as they use other materials which aren't being discussed.
Would be nice if the ones publicizing the study wasn't Stew Peters affiliated. But the study itself doesn't appear to be from them necessarily.
In that "Final Days" film they focus a lot on Karen Kingston who pushes a lot of disinfo regarding patents. I've looked at the patents she mentions and she goes from truth to off the wall nonsense in her explanations of them. At 48:38 she claims that the sheet of graphene the sample sits on creates "new ionic bonds" that then create "millions of spike protein". She smirks as she says this because anyone with a basic understanding of chemistry knows that isn't a thing. https://rumble.com/v2r004k-final-days-worldwide-premiere.html
She knows that graphene is part of an analytical method being used on a sample and not used to generate anything.
However, all that being said, they could put out disinfo about GO (Graphene Oxide) only to debunk it, all the while actually using it. Or perhaps it is a red herring as they use other materials which aren't being discussed.
Would be nice if the ones publicizing the study wasn't Stew Peters affiliated. But the study itself doesn't appear to be from them necessarily.
In that "Final Days" film they focus a lot on Karen Kingston who pushes a lot of disinfo regarding patents. I've looked at the patents she mentions and she goes from truth to off the wall nonsense in her explanations of them. At 48:38 she claims that the sheet of graphene the sample sits on creates "new ionic bonds" that then create "millions of spike protein". She smirks as she says this because anyone with a basic understanding of chemistry knows that isn't a thing. https://rumble.com/v2r004k-final-days-worldwide-premiere.html