Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The Holy Scriptures nowhere state that Adam begat Cain, because he is the True satanic/luciferian seedline of the serpent that survived Noah's Great flood, which the wicked masons and all other secret (occult) societies worship today.

We know specifically that as the children of promise, the priesthood passes from Noah to Shem and that Shem is cited in many texts as Melchizedek and the carrier of the priesthood as passed down to him by Adam, Enoch, Lamech, and his father Noah. It is, my opinion, that the reason Ham is nowhere mentioned in chapter 5 of the Book of Jasher, is because he is not a full-blooded brother of Shem and Japhet but a child from a different marriage and mother just as Cain was not a child of Adam’s directly but the offspring of a different father. My question is Ham’s being left out of this account inference that he is Noah’s stepson or implication that he is the offspring of Noah but from a different wife. I believe that as Ishmael was Abraham’s son so was Ham, Noah’s physical progeny but I do question the significance of their relations as well as the nature of their blood ties as there seems to be something peculiar about him as there was with Cain and Ishmael.

Ham showed terrible disrespect to his father just as Satan had disrespect for God. Like Ham, Satan had mated with Eve who was married to Adam. Satan’s son, Cain, like Ham’s son Canaan, was cursed. They were bastards, born out of wedlock and unnatural seeds of pleasure. If Noah’s wife on the ark was Ham’s mother, she could have been like Hagar who gave birth to Abraham’s son, Ishmael, who Scripture denotes was not a child of promise but a child of man’s desire. Hagar, being an Egyptian, had mixed serpent genes that prohibited Ishmael from being a child of promise as he was not pure. Only Sarah, Abraham’s wife, who was of the same flesh as Abraham could give birth to a pure child of promise and is why Isaac received God’s blessing. This explains if Ham’s mother was a descendant of people who had mixed with Cain’s lineage, he would have inherited some of her genes—even though recessive. But, when she and her son, Ham, mated and produced their child, Canaan, he contained more dominant traits of the serpent lineage than of Noah’s pure DNA. Noah was in a drunken state when he was uncovered in his tent. Scripture reveals, “Ham saw the nakedness of his father.” “Wine is a mocker that deceives,” according to Proverbs 20:1.

Serpent DNA Survived the Flood through Adultery God allowed a remnant of the serpent lineage to cross over the flood through Noah’s wife and younger son, Ham. Although Ham was Noah’s son, he was a half-brother to Shem and Japheth who were both brothers with the same mother. This can be determined from Scripture through various words used to describe the brotherly relationship between Shem and Japheth, as Japheth was the elder brother of Shem.

Unto Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the brother of Japheth the elder, even to him were children born. Genesis 10:21 The Bible does not say the wife of Noah who entered the ark was mother to any of his three sons. But if she was, the only one would have been Ham as he was the youngest according to Genesis 9:24. There is a great possibility Noah’s final wife on the ark had genetic traits from Cain’s lineage because only Noah remained pure in his lineage. Nothing is mentioned about his present wife’s lineage at her point of entering the ark. This may explain Noah having no more children after the flood because of her uncleanness. It also explains what happened when she and Ham devised a way to get Satan’s genetic tree to regenerate in dominant genes among Ham’s lineage by having sex.

Ham committed a terrible atrocity against his father. Even worse, he was proud, boastful, and completely satisfied with his evil. Such behavior was not a trait of Noah but is identical to the traits of Cain. Noah’s wife and their son, Ham, were the two unclean humans brought onto the ark, just like a pair of unclean animals of each kind were allowed on the ark, per Genesis 7:2.

The first so called "NWO Tyrant King" Nimrod was also Ham's grandson btw.

This insight will also connect why Nimrod as descendent of Ham and Canaan’s line, would begin to work again with the fallen ones in attempt to unite the world in first post Atlantean attempt to establish New World Order. Nimrod as the post-flood Babylonian Caesar is also the one that revitalizes and re-institutes the religion of the watchers, incorporating into it human, child, and victim sacrifice as part of their worship ritual.

The Satanic Seedline of Cain - Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjKeZK3nq0g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEME1KKQkfg

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UiEJcaKdnXCI

https://www.bitchute.com/video/NHDOuNEp84sh

99 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The Holy Scriptures nowhere state that Adam begat Cain, because he is the True satanic/luciferian seedline of the serpent that survived Noah's Great flood, which the wicked masons and all other secret (occult) societies worship today.

We know specifically that as the children of promise, the priesthood passes from Noah to Shem and that Shem is cited in many texts as Melchizedek and the carrier of the priesthood as passed down to him by Adam, Enoch, Lamech, and his father Noah. It is, my opinion, that the reason Ham is nowhere mentioned in chapter 5 of the Book of Jasher, is because he is not a full-blooded brother of Shem and Japhet but a child from a different marriage and mother just as Cain was not a child of Adam’s directly but the offspring of a different father. My question is Ham’s being left out of this account inference that he is Noah’s stepson or implication that he is the offspring of Noah but from a different wife. I believe that as Ishmael was Abraham’s son so was Ham, Noah’s physical progeny but I do question the significance of their relations as well as the nature of their blood ties as there seems to be something peculiar about him as there was with Cain and Ishmael.

Ham showed terrible disrespect to his father just as Satan had disrespect for God. Like Ham, Satan had mated with Eve who was married to Adam. Satan’s son, Cain, like Ham’s son Canaan, was cursed. They were bastards, born out of wedlock and unnatural seeds of pleasure. If Noah’s wife on the ark was Ham’s mother, she could have been like Hagar who gave birth to Abraham’s son, Ishmael, who Scripture denotes was not a child of promise but a child of man’s desire. Hagar, being an Egyptian, had mixed serpent genes that prohibited Ishmael from being a child of promise as he was not pure. Only Sarah, Abraham’s wife, who was of the same flesh as Abraham could give birth to a pure child of promise and is why Isaac received God’s blessing. This explains if Ham’s mother was a descendant of people who had mixed with Cain’s lineage, he would have inherited some of her genes—even though recessive. But, when she and her son, Ham, mated and produced their child, Canaan, he contained more dominant traits of the serpent lineage than of Noah’s pure DNA. Noah was in a drunken state when he was uncovered in his tent. Scripture reveals, “Ham saw the nakedness of his father.” “Wine is a mocker that deceives,” according to Proverbs 20:1.

Serpent DNA Survived the Flood through Adultery God allowed a remnant of the serpent lineage to cross over the flood through Noah’s wife and younger son, Ham. Although Ham was Noah’s son, he was a half-brother to Shem and Japheth who were both brothers with the same mother. This can be determined from Scripture through various words used to describe the brotherly relationship between Shem and Japheth, as Japheth was the elder brother of Shem.

Unto Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the brother of Japheth the elder, even to him were children born. Genesis 10:21 The Bible does not say the wife of Noah who entered the ark was mother to any of his three sons. But if she was, the only one would have been Ham as he was the youngest according to Genesis 9:24. There is a great possibility Noah’s final wife on the ark had genetic traits from Cain’s lineage because only Noah remained pure in his lineage. Nothing is mentioned about his present wife’s lineage at her point of entering the ark. This may explain Noah having no more children after the flood because of her uncleanness. It also explains what happened when she and Ham devised a way to get Satan’s genetic tree to regenerate in dominant genes among Ham’s lineage by having sex.

Ham committed a terrible atrocity against his father. Even worse, he was proud, boastful, and completely satisfied with his evil. Such behavior was not a trait of Noah but is identical to the traits of Cain. Noah’s wife and their son, Ham, were the two unclean humans brought onto the ark, just like a pair of unclean animals of each kind were allowed on the ark, per Genesis 7:2.

The first so called "NWO Tyrant King" Nimrod was also Ham's grandson btw.

This insight will also connect why Nimrod as descendent of Ham and Canaan’s line, would begin to work again with the fallen ones in attempt to unite the world in first post Atlantean attempt to establish New World Order. Nimrod as the post-flood Babylonian Caesar is also the one that revitalizes and re-institutes the religion of the watchers, incorporating into it human, child, and victim sacrifice as part of their worship ritual.

The Satanic Seedline of Cain - Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEME1KKQkfg

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UiEJcaKdnXCI

https://www.bitchute.com/video/NHDOuNEp84sh

99 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The Holy Scriptures nowhere state that Adam begat Cain, because he is the True satanic/luciferian seedline of the serpent that survived Noah's Great flood, which the wicked masons and all other secret occult societies worship today.

We know specifically that as the children of promise, the priesthood passes from Noah to Shem and that Shem is cited in many texts as Melchizedek and the carrier of the priesthood as passed down to him by Adam, Enoch, Lamech, and his father Noah. It is, my opinion, that the reason Ham is nowhere mentioned in chapter 5 of the Book of Jasher, is because he is not a full-blooded brother of Shem and Japhet but a child from a different marriage and mother just as Cain was not a child of Adam’s directly but the offspring of a different father. My question is Ham’s being left out of this account inference that he is Noah’s stepson or implication that he is the offspring of Noah but from a different wife. I believe that as Ishmael was Abraham’s son so was Ham, Noah’s physical progeny but I do question the significance of their relations as well as the nature of their blood ties as there seems to be something peculiar about him as there was with Cain and Ishmael.

Ham showed terrible disrespect to his father just as Satan had disrespect for God. Like Ham, Satan had mated with Eve who was married to Adam. Satan’s son, Cain, like Ham’s son Canaan, was cursed. They were bastards, born out of wedlock and unnatural seeds of pleasure. If Noah’s wife on the ark was Ham’s mother, she could have been like Hagar who gave birth to Abraham’s son, Ishmael, who Scripture denotes was not a child of promise but a child of man’s desire. Hagar, being an Egyptian, had mixed serpent genes that prohibited Ishmael from being a child of promise as he was not pure. Only Sarah, Abraham’s wife, who was of the same flesh as Abraham could give birth to a pure child of promise and is why Isaac received God’s blessing. This explains if Ham’s mother was a descendant of people who had mixed with Cain’s lineage, he would have inherited some of her genes—even though recessive. But, when she and her son, Ham, mated and produced their child, Canaan, he contained more dominant traits of the serpent lineage than of Noah’s pure DNA. Noah was in a drunken state when he was uncovered in his tent. Scripture reveals, “Ham saw the nakedness of his father.” “Wine is a mocker that deceives,” according to Proverbs 20:1.

Serpent DNA Survived the Flood through Adultery God allowed a remnant of the serpent lineage to cross over the flood through Noah’s wife and younger son, Ham. Although Ham was Noah’s son, he was a half-brother to Shem and Japheth who were both brothers with the same mother. This can be determined from Scripture through various words used to describe the brotherly relationship between Shem and Japheth, as Japheth was the elder brother of Shem.

Unto Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the brother of Japheth the elder, even to him were children born. Genesis 10:21 The Bible does not say the wife of Noah who entered the ark was mother to any of his three sons. But if she was, the only one would have been Ham as he was the youngest according to Genesis 9:24. There is a great possibility Noah’s final wife on the ark had genetic traits from Cain’s lineage because only Noah remained pure in his lineage. Nothing is mentioned about his present wife’s lineage at her point of entering the ark. This may explain Noah having no more children after the flood because of her uncleanness. It also explains what happened when she and Ham devised a way to get Satan’s genetic tree to regenerate in dominant genes among Ham’s lineage by having sex.

Ham committed a terrible atrocity against his father. Even worse, he was proud, boastful, and completely satisfied with his evil. Such behavior was not a trait of Noah but is identical to the traits of Cain. Noah’s wife and their son, Ham, were the two unclean humans brought onto the ark, just like a pair of unclean animals of each kind were allowed on the ark, per Genesis 7:2.

The first so called "NWO Tyrant King" Nimrod was also Ham's grandson btw.

This insight will also connect why Nimrod as descendent of Ham and Canaan’s line, would begin to work again with the fallen ones in attempt to unite the world in first post Atlantean attempt to establish New World Order. Nimrod as the post-flood Babylonian Caesar is also the one that revitalizes and re-institutes the religion of the watchers, incorporating into it human, child, and victim sacrifice as part of their worship ritual.

The Satanic Seedline of Cain - Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEME1KKQkfg

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UiEJcaKdnXCI

https://www.bitchute.com/video/NHDOuNEp84sh

99 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The Holy Scriptures nowhere state Adam begat Cain, because he is the True satanic/luciferian seedline of the serpent that survived Noah's Great flood, which the wicked masons and all other secret occult societies today worship.

We know specifically that as the children of promise, the priesthood passes from Noah to Shem and that Shem is cited in many texts as Melchizedek and the carrier of the priesthood as passed down to him by Adam, Enoch, Lamech, and his father Noah. It is, my opinion, that the reason Ham is nowhere mentioned in chapter 5 of the Book of Jasher, is because he is not a full-blooded brother of Shem and Japhet but a child from a different marriage and mother just as Cain was not a child of Adam’s directly but the offspring of a different father. My question is Ham’s being left out of this account inference that he is Noah’s stepson or implication that he is the offspring of Noah but from a different wife. I believe that as Ishmael was Abraham’s son so was Ham, Noah’s physical progeny but I do question the significance of their relations as well as the nature of their blood ties as there seems to be something peculiar about him as there was with Cain and Ishmael.

Ham showed terrible disrespect to his father just as Satan had disrespect for God. Like Ham, Satan had mated with Eve who was married to Adam. Satan’s son, Cain, like Ham’s son Canaan, was cursed. They were bastards, born out of wedlock and unnatural seeds of pleasure. If Noah’s wife on the ark was Ham’s mother, she could have been like Hagar who gave birth to Abraham’s son, Ishmael, who Scripture denotes was not a child of promise but a child of man’s desire. Hagar, being an Egyptian, had mixed serpent genes that prohibited Ishmael from being a child of promise as he was not pure. Only Sarah, Abraham’s wife, who was of the same flesh as Abraham could give birth to a pure child of promise and is why Isaac received God’s blessing. This explains if Ham’s mother was a descendant of people who had mixed with Cain’s lineage, he would have inherited some of her genes—even though recessive. But, when she and her son, Ham, mated and produced their child, Canaan, he contained more dominant traits of the serpent lineage than of Noah’s pure DNA. Noah was in a drunken state when he was uncovered in his tent. Scripture reveals, “Ham saw the nakedness of his father.” “Wine is a mocker that deceives,” according to Proverbs 20:1.

Serpent DNA Survived the Flood through Adultery God allowed a remnant of the serpent lineage to cross over the flood through Noah’s wife and younger son, Ham. Although Ham was Noah’s son, he was a half-brother to Shem and Japheth who were both brothers with the same mother. This can be determined from Scripture through various words used to describe the brotherly relationship between Shem and Japheth, as Japheth was the elder brother of Shem.

Unto Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the brother of Japheth the elder, even to him were children born. Genesis 10:21 The Bible does not say the wife of Noah who entered the ark was mother to any of his three sons. But if she was, the only one would have been Ham as he was the youngest according to Genesis 9:24. There is a great possibility Noah’s final wife on the ark had genetic traits from Cain’s lineage because only Noah remained pure in his lineage. Nothing is mentioned about his present wife’s lineage at her point of entering the ark. This may explain Noah having no more children after the flood because of her uncleanness. It also explains what happened when she and Ham devised a way to get Satan’s genetic tree to regenerate in dominant genes among Ham’s lineage by having sex.

Ham committed a terrible atrocity against his father. Even worse, he was proud, boastful, and completely satisfied with his evil. Such behavior was not a trait of Noah but is identical to the traits of Cain. Noah’s wife and their son, Ham, were the two unclean humans brought onto the ark, just like a pair of unclean animals of each kind were allowed on the ark, per Genesis 7:2.

The first so called "NWO Tyrant King" Nimrod was also Ham's grandson btw.

This insight will also connect why Nimrod as descendent of Ham and Canaan’s line, would begin to work again with the fallen ones in attempt to unite the world in first post Atlantean attempt to establish New World Order. Nimrod as the post-flood Babylonian Caesar is also the one that revitalizes and re-institutes the religion of the watchers, incorporating into it human, child, and victim sacrifice as part of their worship ritual.

The Satanic Seedline of Cain - Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEME1KKQkfg

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UiEJcaKdnXCI

https://www.bitchute.com/video/NHDOuNEp84sh

99 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The Holy Scriptures nowhere state Adam begat Cain, because he is the True satanic/luciferian seedline of the serpent that survived Noah's Great flood, which the wicked masons and all other secret occult societies today worship.

We know specifically that as the children of promise, the priesthood passes from Noah to Shem and that Shem is cited in many texts as Melchizedek and the carrier of the priesthood as passed down to him by Adam, Enoch, Lamech, and his father Noah. It is, my opinion, that the reason Ham is nowhere mentioned in chapter 5 of the Book of Jasher, is because he is not a full-blooded brother of Shem and Japhet but a child from a different marriage and mother just as Cain was not a child of Adam’s directly but the offspring of a different father. My question is Ham’s being left out of this account inference that he is Noah’s stepson or implication that he is the offspring of Noah but from a different wife. I believe that as Ishmael was Abraham’s son so was Ham, Noah’s physical progeny but I do question the significance of their relations as well as the nature of their blood ties as there seems to be something peculiar about him as there was with Cain and Ishmael.

Ham showed terrible disrespect to his father just as Satan had disrespect for God. Like Ham, Satan had mated with Eve who was married to Adam. Satan’s son, Cain, like Ham’s son Canaan, was cursed. They were bastards, born out of wedlock and unnatural seeds of pleasure. If Noah’s wife on the ark was Ham’s mother, she could have been like Hagar who gave birth to Abraham’s son, Ishmael, who Scripture denotes was not a child of promise but a child of man’s desire. Hagar, being an Egyptian, had mixed serpent genes that prohibited Ishmael from being a child of promise as he was not pure. Only Sarah, Abraham’s wife, who was of the same flesh as Abraham could give birth to a pure child of promise and is why Isaac received God’s blessing. This explains if Ham’s mother was a descendant of people who had mixed with Cain’s lineage, he would have inherited some of her genes—even though recessive. But, when she and her son, Ham, mated and produced their child, Canaan, he contained more dominant traits of the serpent lineage than of Noah’s pure DNA. Noah was in a drunken state when he was uncovered in his tent. Scripture reveals, “Ham saw the nakedness of his father.” “Wine is a mocker that deceives,” according to Proverbs 20:1.

Serpent DNA Survived the Flood through Adultery God allowed a remnant of the serpent lineage to cross over the flood through Noah’s wife and younger son, Ham. Although Ham was Noah’s son, he was a half-brother to Shem and Japheth who were both brothers with the same mother. This can be determined from Scripture through various words used to describe the brotherly relationship between Shem and Japheth, as Japheth was the elder brother of Shem.

Unto Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the brother of Japheth the elder, even to him were children born. Genesis 10:21 The Bible does not say the wife of Noah who entered the ark was mother to any of his three sons. But if she was, the only one would have been Ham as he was the youngest according to Genesis 9:24. There is a great possibility Noah’s final wife on the ark had genetic traits from Cain’s lineage because only Noah remained pure in his lineage. Nothing is mentioned about his present wife’s lineage at her point of entering the ark. This may explain Noah having no more children after the flood because of her uncleanness. It also explains what happened when she and Ham devised a way to get Satan’s genetic tree to regenerate in dominant genes among Ham’s lineage by having sex.

Ham committed a terrible atrocity against his father. Even worse, he was proud, boastful, and completely satisfied with his evil. Such behavior was not a trait of Noah but is identical to the traits of Cain. Noah’s wife and their son, Ham, were the two unclean humans brought onto the ark, just like a pair of unclean animals of each kind were allowed on the ark, per Genesis 7:2.

The Satanic Seedline of Cain - Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEME1KKQkfg

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UiEJcaKdnXCI

https://www.bitchute.com/video/NHDOuNEp84sh

99 days ago
1 score