Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

You cannot measure or find anyone who has measured anything to contradict the law.

Your anonymous statement is not law.

Because the gas has weight, and that weight exceeds the expansion force of the gas - it isn't.

But wouldn't that require the particles to be at rest, for their weight to affect objects (other particles) below?

The reason the law is that the gas pressure is derived from the container walls is because there are no measurements of gas pressure without such a container and there are only measurements of pressure inside a container.

Well, yeah because we're discussing the pressure of the gas against the walls.

In a rigid glass jar, there is no active pressure being pushed on the gas from the jar because the jar is rigid. It's only the pressure that the gas exerts on the container.

It continues to try to expand, as that is gas' nature.

Precisely! So it never comes to rest. As I've been saying.

141 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

You cannot measure or find anyone who has measured anything to contradict the law.

Your anonymous statement is not law.

Because the gas has weight, and that weight exceeds the expansion force of the gas - it isn't.

Have you measured this to be certain?

The reason the law is that the gas pressure is derived from the container walls is because there are no measurements of gas pressure without such a container and there are only measurements of pressure inside a container.

Well, yeah because we're discussing the pressure of the gas against the walls.

In a rigid glass jar, there is no active pressure being pushed on the gas from the jar because the jar is rigid. It's only the pressure that the gas exerts on the container.

It continues to try to expand, as that is gas' nature.

Precisely! So it never comes to rest. As I've been saying.

143 days ago
1 score