I completely agree with everything you said. One of the most fascinating things is how the story of Noah's flood is being validated in some ways, and exactly as you said that is one of the stories that far far predates the old testament.
Now we have prominent scientists and archeologists openly discussing the growing evidence for a world wide flooding event that would've wiped out most if not all civilizations on the planet. And not just one major catastrophic flood, but a series of them spread over a few thousand years.
And what I find really interesting is that the time frame for this flooding puts it at the very dawn of pre-history; the earliest known beginnings of human civilization.
Which seems to strongly imply that the stone age wasn't civilization starting, but rather civilization RE-starting. Which just begs at the mystery of how far along humans had developed before the cataclysm.
Our civilization went from the bronze age to the internet age in 5,000 years. Meanwhile our ancestors before the cataclysm would've had hundreds of thousands of years of a stable environment to develop in.
Enough time for space faring civilizations to rise and fall several times over.
I completely agree with everything you said. One of the most fascinating things is how the story of Noah's flood is being validated in some ways, and exactly as you said that is one of the stories that far far predates the old testament.
Now we have prominent scientists and archeologists openly discussing the growing evidence for a world wide flooding event that would've wiped out most if not all civilizations on the planet. And not just one major catastrophic flood, but a series of them spread over a few thousand years.
And what I find really interesting is that the time frame for this flooding puts it at the very dawn of pre-history; the earliest known beginnings of human civilization.
Which seems to strongly imply that the stone age wasn't civilization starting, but rather civilization RE-starting. Which just begs at the mystery of how far along humans had developed before the cataclysm.
Our civilization went from the bronze age to the internet age in 5,000 years. Meanwhile our ancestors before the cataclysm would've had hundreds of thousands of years of a stable environment to develop in.
Enough time for space faring civilizations to rise and fall several times over.
I completely agree with everything you said. One of the most fascinating things is how the story of Noah's flood is being validated in some ways, and exactly as you said that is one of the stories that far far predates the old testament.
Now we have prominent scientists and archeologists openly discussing the growing evidence for a world wide flooding event that would've wiped out most if not all civilizations on the planet. And not just one major catastrophic flood, but a series of them spread over a few thousand years.
And what I find really interesting is that the time frame for this flooding puts it at the very dawn of pre-history; the earliest known beginnings of human civilization.
Which seems to strongly imply that the stone age and wasn't civilization starting, but rather civilization RE-starting. Which just begs at the mystery of how far along humans had developed before the cataclysm.
Our civilization went from from the bronze age to the internet age in 5,000 years. Meanwhile our ancestors before the cataclysm would've had hundreds of thousands of years of a stable environment to develop in.
Enough time for space faring civilizations to rise and fall several times over.