You know what is better than an image with text would be the original website which might have links cited.

But it looks like even on that some of those claims were speculative and not something proven. For example, I'd want to see confirmation that babies being born are expressing spike protein.

You know what is better than an image with text would be the original website which might have links cited.

But it looks like even on that some of those claims were speculative and not something proven. For example, I'd want to see confirmation that babies being born as expressing spike protein.

You know what is better than an image with text would be the original website which might actually have links cited.

But it looks like even on that some of those claims were speculative and not something proven. For example, I'd want to see confirmation that babies being born as expressing spike protein.