You're going back to "KoChS PoStULatES" again?

Previously, when I showed you that "postulate" means "assumption" and that authority figure you were citing didn't even stick to his own assumptions you completely dropped that argument, and pivoted to something new.

Yet that was your main argument. The FIRST thing you presented when asked for justification of your beliefs.

A set of random assumptions from some idiot in the 1800s... A naked and overt argument from authority that you would never in a million years accept if it was made against your position.

Any logical person can tell that you're full of shit based on the simple fact that instead of presenting and explaining positive evidence in favor of your position, all you do is attempt to undermine evidence for the other position, as if somehow that makes your position stronger.

It doesn't... It just shows you have no evidence to prop up your position so the only way you think you can make it stand taller is to try and knock down the opposing argument.

But you have proven over and over that you absolutely refuse to do any experiments that could possibly support your argument. As that's where our debates always end.... Me telling you to go out there and prove that you're immune to viral infections in some way, and you refusing to do it.

You're going back to "KoChS PoStULatES" again?

Previously, when I showed you that "postulate" means "assumption" and that authority figure you were citing didn't even stick to his own assumptions you completely dropped that argument, and pivoted to something new.

Yet that was your main argument. The FIRST thing you presented when asked for justification of your beliefs.

A set of random assumptions from some idiot in the 1800s... A naked and overt argument from authority that you would never in a million years accept if it was made against your position.

Any logical person can tell that you're full of shit based on the simple fact that instead of presenting and explaining positive evidence in favor of your position, all you do is attempt to undermine evidence for the other position, as if somehow that makes your position stronger.

It doesn't... It just shows you have no evidence to prop up your position so the only way you think you can make it stand taller is to try and knock down the opposing argument.

But you have proven over and over that you absolutely refuse to do any experiments that could possibly support your argument. As that's where our debates always end.... Me telling you to go out there and prove that you're immune to viral infections in some way, and you refusing to do it.