All your examples are perfectly expectable and predictable for any user with knowledge, so no such user will ever ask them.

The point is that asking those questions serves as an educational lesson for users WITHOUT knowledge so they can see where the boundaries and limitations are...

Which is just about everyone who uses it, IMO...

As for computer code, it is not just some compilation of patterns reused over and over. To write something sensible programmer should understand context and code itself. ANN could generate working code, but it does not mean this code will work correctly. There are already many articles around about attempts to generate useful code. Even "Hello world" sometimes appear surrealistic, especially for languages rare in training dataset.

There is a process that does involve work on the part of the user... It's not going to replace a programmer, but it's going to become a tool in the programmers arsenal.

And I've had pretty good success getting it to code small to moderate sized tasks for things I need done. But there are definitely techniques you have to employ to work around it's limitations... Such as instead having it code the whole script all at once, you start with just the most basic operations and get those functioning... Then you close the chat, open a new one, paste in the code again, and ask it to add new functions.... etc...

The longer a coding chat goes on the more likely it is to not be able to catch and correct it's own mistakes.

All your examples are perfectly expectable and predictable for any user with knowledge, so no such user will ever ask them.

The point is that asking those questions serves as an educational lesson for users WITHOUT knowledge so they can see where the boundaries and limitations are...

As for computer code, it is not just some compilation of patterns reused over and over. To write something sensible programmer should understand context and code itself. ANN could generate working code, but it does not mean this code will work correctly. There are already many articles around about attempts to generate useful code. Even "Hello world" sometimes appear surrealistic, especially for languages rare in training dataset.

There is a process that does involve work on the part of the user... It's not going to replace a programmer, but it's going to become a tool in the programmers arsenal.

And I've had pretty good success getting it to code small to moderate sized tasks for things I need done. But there are definitely techniques you have to employ to work around it's limitations... Such as instead having it code the whole script all at once, you start with just the most basic operations and get those functioning... Then you close the chat, open a new one, paste in the code again, and ask it to add new functions.... etc...

The longer a coding chat goes on the more likely it is to not be able to catch and correct it's own mistakes.