Using pedowikia as source of historic knowledge is worse than eating fake WEF meat.

Cope and a genetic fallacy. See the link of the post which is not wikipedia.

Or better yet, is Princeton publishing good enough for you? https://archive.org/details/dunlop-d.-m.-the-history-of-the-jewish-khazars/page/n1/mode/2up

Russia as state is traced at least from year 3099 from Creation ( 2409 B.C.) when brother Dukes Sloven and Rus established town of Slovensk (now Novgorod) as capital of Rus. And it is just first documented occurence in ancient written sources, and who knows how far that really goes into the past, especially taking in account fact that people live here since paleolite.

Around 1100 years ago Russia just become empire, and that does not mean that there was no Russian statehood earlier.

Any source on that bizarre claim?

Here's what I found:

https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780191736636.timeline.0001

If you are not aware, it is not allowed for goyim to study judaism. It is one of the first talmudic rule that become core of modern Talmud. There is no way that Khazar etnicities was allowed to do that. Only after replacement with Jews, Khazarian elite began to practicise judaism, because they was already Jews.

Have you heard of messianic jews? Was Bulan and his heirs jewish or did he convert? I know the rule but since we have a historic jewish kingdom that's not made up of jews apparently it was disregarded.

Then they began to build their sinagogues and Khazaria become Kaganate, because state become leaded by top Jewish priest - kagan (cohen, kogan, cogen... - many Jews have that surnames). Only since then Khazaria become Khazarian Kaganate.

Khazaria was established as khaganate initially. All turkic tribes were ruled by khans and they had zero connection to judaism - they were pagans, practicing mostly tangrism. My country was a khaganate before it was Christianized, so no, the word khan has nothing to do with the jewish cohen which means "priest". Here's the meaning:

khan (n.) title of sovereign princes in Tatar counties, c. 1400, from Turkic, literally "lord, prince," contraction of khaqan "ruler, sovereign."

What is this, free dance interpretation class? How do you expect anyone to take you seriously with such bs?

There is no such etnicity as "khazarian". Like there is no etnicity as "american". It is not etnicity, it is citizenship. Khazarian Kaganate was multiethnic state, with Jews as elite and many other local tribes as slaves and serves. In the best case you could speak about "Khazarian Jews", just like you speak about "Americal Jews" or any other Jews. And this means they are Jews ethnically, not some "khazarians" or "americans".

Again, khazarian doesn't refer to ethnicity but to origin and as a way to delineate khazarian false jews from the Biblical jews and their bloodlines.

You could continue to play that disgusting game, but this will not make Jews someone else. Jews was Jews, is Jews and will be Jews, whatever names you will try to push. They will always be the same Jews as in Old Testament.

I'm sorry the truth doesn't sit well with your delusions. I'm not pushing anything and the reason of the post is strictly historic and I'm trying not to let any bias in. I have problems with both Biblical Christ-killing jews as well as false ashkenazi jews but that's not the point of the post.

Using pedowikia as source of historic knowledge is worse than eating fake WEF meat.

Cope and a genetic fallacy. See the link of the post whic is not wikipedia.

Or better yet, is Princeton publishing good enough for you? https://archive.org/details/dunlop-d.-m.-the-history-of-the-jewish-khazars/page/n1/mode/2up

Russia as state is traced at least from year 3099 from Creation ( 2409 B.C.) when brother Dukes Sloven and Rus established town of Slovensk (now Novgorod) as capital of Rus. And it is just first documented occurence in ancient written sources, and who knows how far that really goes into the past, especially taking in account fact that people live here since paleolite.

Around 1100 years ago Russia just become empire, and that does not mean that there was no Russian statehood earlier.

Any source on that bizarre claim?

Here's what I found:

https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780191736636.timeline.0001

If you are not aware, it is not allowed for goyim to study judaism. It is one of the first talmudic rule that become core of modern Talmud. There is no way that Khazar etnicities was allowed to do that. Only after replacement with Jews, Khazarian elite began to practicise judaism, because they was already Jews.

Have you heard of messianic jews? Was Bulan and his heirs jewish or did he convert? I know the rule but since we have a historic jewish kingdom that's not made up of jews apparently it was disregarded.

Then they began to build their sinagogues and Khazaria become Kaganate, because state become leaded by top Jewish priest - kagan (cohen, kogan, cogen... - many Jews have that surnames). Only since then Khazaria become Khazarian Kaganate.

Khazaria was established as khaganate initially. All turkic tribes were ruled by khans and they had zero connection to judaism. My country was a khaganate before it was Christianized, so no, the word khan has nothing to do with the jewish cohen which means "priest". Here's the meaning:

khan (n.) title of sovereign princes in Tatar counties, c. 1400, from Turkic, literally "lord, prince," contraction of khaqan "ruler, sovereign."

What is this, free dance interpretation class? How do you expect anyone to take you seriously with such bs?

There is no such etnicity as "khazarian". Like there is no etnicity as "american". It is not etnicity, it is citizenship. Khazarian Kaganate was multiethnic state, with Jews as elite and many other local tribes as slaves and serves. In the best case you could speak about "Khazarian Jews", just like you speak about "Americal Jews" or any other Jews. And this means they are Jews ethnically, not some "khazarians" or "americans".

Again, khazarian doesn't refer to ethnicity but to origin and as a way to delineate khazarian false jews from the Biblical jews and their bloodlines.

You could continue to play that disgusting game, but this will not make Jews someone else. Jews was Jews, is Jews and will be Jews, whatever names you will try to push. They will always be the same Jews as in Old Testament.

I'm sorry the truth doesn't sit well with your delusions. I'm not pushing anything and the reason of the post is strictly historic and I'm trying not to let any bias in. I have problems with both Biblical Christ-killing jews as well as false ashkenazi jews but that's not the point of the post.