That's literally what democracy looks like on paper.

Ideally, democracy is a system that uses the opinion of collective whereas anarchy is about individual choice.

The governed give their consent by voting for the people who govern.

That's where democracy fails. There's a lot of idiots who can be easily swayed by bright colors and catchy slogans

It can be revoked by voting against those people and if they don't comply, the voters can get their arms and drag them out by force.

That's not revoking the consent of the governed or declaring the governments authority illegitimate. That's being complicit in the governments actions even if the person you voted for loses. You cannot vote your way out of tyranny, by voting at all you are legitimizing the governments authority. Why do you think there's gates around the White House? 🤣

Besides I have a strong dislike for the word consent these days. It has strong SJW soycuck undertones. It sounds weak and effeminate like the feminized culture it comes from - hardly any ubermensch vibes to it. What do people, who have power over you care if you consent or not? No one will ask you for consent in an anarchy, are you kidding me?

That's just preposterous. As if the modern use of the word distorts it. The etymology of consent. Recorded in Middle English since circa 1225, borrowed from Old French consentir, from Latin cōnsentīre, present active infinitive of cōnsentiō (“to agree; to assent, consent”), itself from com- (“with”) + sentiō (“to feel”)

I think that's a personal problem believing words have feelings to them instead of explicit meanings. If you want to know where those feelings are coming from you only need to look in the mirror. I suppose someone whose relied upon the illusory safety the government provides would have trouble seeing the benefits of being in control of your own life. We are looking at it from vastly different perspectives. I'm looking at it as a soldier and you are looking at it as a threat to the comfortable bubble you've resided in your entire life.

That's literally what democracy looks like on paper.

Ideally, democracy is a system that uses the opinion of collective whereas anarchy is about individual choice.

The governed give their consent by voting for the people who govern.

That's where democracy fails. There's a lot of idiots who can be easily swayed by bright colors and catchy slogans

It can be revoked by voting against those people and if they don't comply, the voters can get their arms and drag them out by force.

That's not revoking the consent of the governed or declaring the governments authority illegitimate. That's being complicit in the governments actions even if the person you voted for loses. You cannot vote your way out of tyranny, by voting at all you are legitimizing the governments authority. Why do you think there's gates around the White House? 🤣

Besides I have a strong dislike for the word consent these days. It has strong SJW soycuck undertones. It sounds weak and effeminate like the feminized culture it comes from - hardly any ubermensch vibes to it. What do people, who have power over you care if you consent or not? No one will ask you for consent in an anarchy, are you kidding me?

That's just preposterous. As if the modern use of the word distorts it. The etymology of consent. Recorded in Middle English since circa 1225, borrowed from Old French consentir, from Latin cōnsentīre, present active infinitive of cōnsentiō (“to agree; to assent, consent”), itself from com- (“with”) + sentiō (“to feel”)

I think that's a personal problem believing words have feelings to them instead of explicit meanings. If you want to know where those feelings are coming from you only need to look in the mirror. I suppose someone whose relied upon the illusory safety the government provides would have trouble seeing the benefits of being in control of your own life. We are looking at it from vastly different perspectives. I'm looking at it as soldier and you are looking at it as a threat to the comfortable bubble you've resided in your entire life.

That's literally what democracy looks like on paper.

Ideally, democracy is a system that uses the opinion of collective whereas anarchy is about individual choice.

The governed give their consent by voting for the people who govern.

That's where democracy fails. There's a lot of idiots who can be easily swayed by bright colors and catchy slogans

It can be revoked by voting against those people and if they don't comply, the voters can get their arms and drag them out by force.

That's not revoking the consent of the governed or declaring the governments authority illegitimate. That's being complicit in the governments actions even if the person you voted for loses. You cannot vote your way out of tyranny, by voting at all you are legitimizing the governments authority. Why do you think there's gates around the White House? 🤣

Besides I have a strong dislike for the word consent these days. It has strong SJW soycuck undertones. It sounds weak and effeminate like the feminized culture it comes from - hardly any ubermensch vibes to it. What do people, who have power over you care if you consent or not? No one will ask you for consent in an anarchy, are you kidding me?

That's just preposterous. As if the modern use of the word distorts it. The etymology of consent. Recorded in Middle English since circa 1225, borrowed from Old French consentir, from Latin cōnsentīre, present active infinitive of cōnsentiō (“to agree; to assent, consent”), itself from com- (“with”) + sentiō (“to feel”)

I think that's a personal problem believing words have feelings to them instead of explicit meanings. If you want to know where those feelings are coming from you only need to look in the mirror. I suppose someone whose relied upon the illusory safety the government provides would have trouble seeing the benefits of being in control of your own life. We are looking at it from vastly different perspectives. I'm look at it as soldier and you are looking at it as a threat to the comfortable bubble you've resided in your entire life.

That's literally what democracy looks like on paper.

Ideally, democracy is a system that uses the opinion of collective whereas anarchy is about individual choice.

The governed give their consent by voting for the people who govern.

That's where democracy fails. There's a lot of idiots who can be easily swayed by bright colors and catchy slogans

It can be revoked by voting against those people and if they don't comply, the voters can get their arms and drag them out by force.

That's not revoking the consent of the governed or declaring the governments authority illegitimate. That's being complicit in the governments actions even if the person you voted for loses. You cannot vote your way out of tyranny, by voting at all you are legitimizing the governments authority. Why do you think there's gates around the White House? 🤣

Besides I have a strong dislike for the word consent these days. It has strong SJW soycuck undertones. It sounds weak and effeminate like the feminized culture it comes from - hardly any ubermensch vibes to it. What do people, who have power over you care if you consent or not? No one will ask you for consent in an anarchy, are you kidding me?

That's just preposterous. As if the modern use of the word distorts it. The etymology of consent. Recorded in Middle English since circa 1225, borrowed from Old French consentir, from Latin cōnsentīre, present active infinitive of cōnsentiō (“to agree; to assent, consent”), itself from com- (“with”) + sentiō (“to feel”)

I think that's a personal problem believing words have feelings to them instead of implicit meanings. If you want to know where those feelings are coming from you only need to look in the mirror. I suppose someone whose relied upon the illusory safety the government provides would have trouble seeing the benefits of being in control of your own life. We are looking at it from vastly different perspectives. I'm look at it as soldier and you are looking at it as a threat to the comfortable bubble you've resided in your entire life.

That's literally what democracy looks like on paper.

Ideally, democracy is a system that uses the opinion of collective whereas anarchy is about individual choice.

The governed give their consent by voting for the people who govern.

That's where democracy fails. There's a lot of idiots who can be easily swayed by bright colors and catchy slogans

It can be revoked by voting against those people and if they don't comply, the voters can get their arms and drag them out by force.

That's not revoking the consent of the governed or declaring the governments authority illegitimate. That's being complicit in the governments actions even if the person you voted for loses. You cannot vote your way out of tyranny, by voting at all you are legitimizing the governments authority. Why do you think there's gates around the White House? 🤣

Besides I have a strong dislike for the word consent these days. It has strong SJW soycuck undertones. It sounds weak and effeminate like the feminized culture it comes from - hardly any ubermensch vibes to it. What do people, who have power over you care if you consent or not? No one will ask you for consent in an anarchy, are you kidding me?

That's just preposterous. As if the modern use of the word distorts it. The etymology of consent. Recorded in Middle English since circa 1225, borrowed from Old French consentir, from Latin cōnsentīre, present active infinitive of cōnsentiō (“to agree; to assent, consent”), itself from com- (“with”) + sentiō (“to feel”)

I think that's a personal problem believing words have feelings to them instead of direct meanings. If you want to know where those feelings are coming from you only need to look in the mirror. I suppose someone whose relied upon the illusory safety the government provides would have trouble seeing the benefits of being in control of your own life. We are looking at it from vastly different perspectives. I'm look at it as soldier and you are looking at it as a threat to the comfortable bubble you've resided in your entire life.

That's literally what democracy looks like on paper.

Ideally, democracy is a system that uses the opinion of collective whereas anarchy is about individual choice.

The governed give their consent by voting for the people who govern.

That's where democracy fails. There's a lot of idiots who can be easily swayed by bright colors and catchy slogans

It can be revoked by voting against those people and if they don't comply, the voters can get their arms and drag them out by force.

That's not revoking the consent of the governed or declaring the governments authority illegitimate. That's being complicit in the governments actions even if the person you voted for loses. You cannot vote your way out of tyranny, by voting at all you are legitimizing the governments authority. Why do you think there's gates around the White House? 🤣

Besides I have a strong dislike for the word consent these days. It has strong SJW soycuck undertones. It sounds weak and effeminate like the feminized culture it comes from - hardly any ubermensch vibes to it. What do people, who have power over you care if you consent or not? No one will ask you for consent in an anarchy, are you kidding me?

That's just preposterous. As if the modern use of the word distorts it. The etymology of consent. Recorded in Middle English since circa 1225, borrowed from Old French consentir, from Latin cōnsentīre, present active infinitive of cōnsentiō (“to agree; to assent, consent”), itself from com- (“with”) + sentiō (“to feel”)

I think that's a personal problem believing words have feelings to then instead of direct meanings. If you want to know where those feelings are coming from you only need to look in the mirror. I suppose someone whose relied upon the illusory safety the government provides would have trouble seeing the benefits of being in control of your own life. We are looking at it from vastly different perspectives. I'm look at it as soldier and you are looking at it as a threat to the comfortable bubble you've resided in your entire life.

That's literally what democracy looks like on paper.

Ideally, democracy is a system that uses the opinion of collective whereas anarchy is about individual choice.

The governed give their consent by voting for the people who govern.

That's where democracy fails. There's a lot of idiots who can be easily swayed by bright colors and catchy slogans

It can be revoked by voting against those people and if they don't comply, the voters can get their arms and drag them out by force.

That's not revoking the consent of the governed or declaring the governments authority illegitimate. That's being complicit in the governments actions even if the person you voted for loses. You cannot vote your way out of tyranny, by voting at all you are legitimizing the governments authority. Why do you think there's gates around the White House? 🤣

Besides I have a strong dislike for the word consent these days. It has strong SJW soycuck undertones. It sounds weak and effeminate like the feminized culture it comes from - hardly any ubermensch vibes to it. What do people, who have power over you care if you consent or not? No one will ask you for consent in an anarchy, are you kidding me?

That's just preposterous. As if the modern use of word distorts it. The etymology of consent. Recorded in Middle English since circa 1225, borrowed from Old French consentir, from Latin cōnsentīre, present active infinitive of cōnsentiō (“to agree; to assent, consent”), itself from com- (“with”) + sentiō (“to feel”)

I think that's a personal problem believing words have feelings to then instead of direct meanings. If you want to know where those feelings are coming from you only need to look in the mirror. I suppose someone whose relied upon the illusory safety the government provides would have trouble seeing the benefits of being in control of your own life. We are looking at it from vastly different perspectives. I'm look at it as soldier and you are looking at it as a threat to the comfortable bubble you've resided in your entire life.