if these postulates are real science where is the control group?

Where is the hypothesis?!

It's nothing but a series of absurd demands. It's not even a real experiment.

XxxRDTPRNxxX's Postulates: if you cannot satisfy these then fish are not real.

postulate 1: a fish must be removed from a pond, skinned alive, tuned inside out, and placed in a bucket.

postulate 2: the fish must reproduce inside the bucket.

postulate 3: the new fish must then be dumped into an empty pond.

postulate 4: you must then recapture the same kind of fish from the previously empty pond.

Since no one has satisfied those postulates I just proved fish are fake and gay...Right?

if these postulates are real science where is the control group?

Where is the hypothesis he is proving? How does the experiment prove the hypothesis?

It's nothing but a series of absurd demands. It's not even a real experiment.

XxxRDTPRNxxX's Postulates: if you cannot satisfy these then fish are not real.

postulate 1: a fish must be removed from a pond, skinned alive, tuned inside out, and placed in a bucket.

postulate 2: the fish must reproduce inside the bucket.

postulate 3: the new fish must then be dumped into an empty pond.

postulate 4: you must then recapture the same kind of fish from the previously empty pond.

Since no one has satisfied those postulates I just proved fish are fake and gay...Right?

if these postulates are real science where is the control group?

Where is the hypothesis he is proving? How does the experiment prove the hypothesis?

It's nothing but a series of absurd demands.

XxxRDTPRNxxX's Postulates: if you cannot satisfy these then fish are not real.

postulate 1: a fish must be removed from a pond, skinned alive, tuned inside out, and placed in a bucket.

postulate 2: the fish must reproduce inside the bucket.

postulate 3: the new fish must then be dumped into an empty pond.

postulate 4: you must then recapture the same kind of fish from the previously empty pond.

Since no one has satisfied those postulates I just proved fish are fake and gay...Right?

if these postulates are real science where is the control group?

Where is the hypothesis he is proving? How does the experiment prove the hypothesis?

It's nothing but a series of absurd demands.

XxxRDTPRNxxX's Postulates: if you cannot satisfy these then fish are not real.

postulate 1: a fish must be removed from a pond, skinned alive, tuned inside out, and placed in a bucket.

postulate 2: the fish must reproduce inside the bucket.

postulate 3: the bucket must then be dumped into an empty pond.

postulate 4: you must then recapture the same kind of fish from the previously empty pond.

Since no one has satisfied those postulates I just proved fish are fake and gay...Right?

if these postulates are real science where is the control group?

Where is the hypothesis he is proving? How does the experiment prove the hypothesis?

It's nothing but a series of absurd demands.

XxxRDTPRNSxxX Postulates: if you cannot satisfy these then fish are not real.

postulate 1: a fish must be removed from a pond, skinned alive, tuned inside out, and placed in a bucket.

postulate 2: the fish must reproduce inside the bucket.

postulate 3: the bucket must then be dumped into an empty pond.

postulate 4: you must then recapture the same kind of fish from the previously empty pond.

Since no one has satisfied those postulates I just proved fish are fake and gay...Right?

if these postulates are real science where is the control group?

Where is the hypothesis he is proving?

it's nothing but a series of absurd demands.