Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Utterly stultifying that so many can apply that level of discernment to what is ingested but not to what is injected. I could not find upper or lower toxicity levels for internal exposure to aluminum, which is worrying because there's no difference in manufacture of vaccines for adults and vaccines for children.

1 year ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

Utterly stultifying that so many can apply that level of discernment to what is ingested but not to what is injected. I could not find upper or lower toxicity levels for internal exposure to aluminum, which is worrying because there's no difference in manufacture of vaccines fur adults and vaccines for children.

1 year ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

Utterly stultifying that so many can apply that level of discernment to what is ingested but not to what is injected.

1 year ago
2 score
Reason: Original

Utterly stultifying that so many can apply that level of discernment to what is ingested but not to what is injected. The two even share a problematic commonality: aluminum. Despite it being well known to cause inflammation to the brain and nervous system, I could find no upper or lower toxicity limit for internal exposure (ingested or injected) to neither aluminum phosphate (food) nor aluminum chloride (jab).

1 year ago
1 score