This models are created specifically to prodce exactly that numbers. That is why nobody even try to prove that models with experiments. If it was scientists who created a model and then find out some threshold or whatever, there would be experiments (may be even rigged) that proves or "proves" their theory/model and so its final conclusion. But look - nobody need any proof at all. This happens only when theory/model was created specifically to give necessary outcome.

Agreed, but what's in question is whether the specific number is of any importance at all or if it's just a random number that sounds convincing (like the 2m rule) and fulfills its function (in the distancing case: atomizing and isolating people; creating constant paranoia about the invisible enemy; everyone is a potential vector of disease/enemy agent; an exercise of restructuring society and everyday life because the experts told us so). Note that none of those model-generated figures are falsifiable.

Wealth is relative. Money translates ultimately to power, energy and control. They don't view money as an end in itself but as means to an end (same as what you said) - namely, means to establish better control and steer humanity as they see fit (or as they are ordered by entities we can speculate about). When you have all the resources of the world at your disposal and you control every aspect of society, including money creation, profit becomes meaningless. That's why the NWO elite is perfectly happy with collapsing the current system and erecting a zero growth centrally planned one (using advanced technology like AI models - basically Skynet).

This models are created specifically to prodce exactly that numbers. That is why nobody even try to prove that models with experiments. If it was scientists who created a model and then find out some threshold or whatever, there would be experiments (may be even rigged) that proves or "proves" their theory/model and so its final conclusion. But look - nobody need any proof at all. This happens only when theory/model was created specifically to give necessary outcome.

Agreed, but what's in question is whether the specific number is of any importance at all or if it's just a random number that sounds convincing (like the 2m rule) and fulfills its function (in the distancing case: atomizing and isolating people; creating constant paranoia about the invisible enemy; everyone is a potential vector of disease/enemy agent; an exercise of restructuring society and everyday life because the experts told us so).

Wealth is relative. Money translates ultimately to power, energy and control. They don't view money as an end in itself but as means to an end (same as what you said) - namely, means to establish better control and steer humanity as they see fit (or as they are ordered by entities we can speculate about). When you have all the resources of the world at your disposal and you control every aspect of society, including money creation, profit becomes meaningless. That's why the NWO elite is perfectly happy with collapsing the current system and erecting a zero growth centrally planned one (using advanced technology like AI models - basically Skynet).

This models are created specifically to prodce exactly that numbers. That is why nobody even try to prove that models with experiments. If it was scientists who created a model and then find out some threshold or whatever, there would be experiments (may be even rigged) that proves or "proves" their theory/model and so its final conclusion. But look - nobody need any proof at all. This happens only when theory/model was created specifically to give necessary outcome.

Agreed, but what's in question is whether the specific number is of any importance at all or if it's just a random number that sounds convincing (like the 2m rule) and fulfills its function (in the distancing case: atomizing and isolating people; creating constant paranoia about the invisible enemy; everyone is a potential vector of disease/enemy agent).

Wealth is relative. Money translates ultimately to power, energy and control. They don't view money as an end in itself but as means to an end (same as what you said) - namely, means to establish better control and steer humanity as they see fit (or as they are ordered by entities we can speculate about). When you have all the resources of the world at your disposal and you control every aspect of society, including money creation, profit becomes meaningless. That's why the NWO elite is perfectly happy with collapsing the current system and erecting a zero growth centrally planned one (using advanced technology like AI models - basically Skynet).

This models are created specifically to prodce exactly that numbers. That is why nobody even try to prove that models with experiments. If it was scientists who created a model and then find out some threshold or whatever, there would be experiments (may be even rigged) that proves or "proves" their theory/model and so its final conclusion. But look - nobody need any proof at all. This happens only when theory/model was created specifically to give necessary outcome.

Agreed, but what's in question is whether the specific number is of any importance at all or if it's just a random number that sounds convincing (like the 2m rule).

Wealth is relative. Money translates ultimately to power, energy and control. They don't view money as an end in itself but as means to an end (same as what you said) - namely, means to establish better control and steer humanity as they see fit (or as they are ordered by entities we can speculate about). When you have all the resources of the world at your disposal and you control every aspect of society, including money creation, profit becomes meaningless. That's why the NWO elite is perfectly happy with collapsing the current system and erecting a zero growth centrally planned one (using advanced technology like AI models - basically Skynet).