for obvious reasons

Latin obvius - "that is in the way, presenting itself readily, open" aka perceivable inspiration...reasoning about suggested information makes one oblivious to it.

For implies forward aka that which forwards (inspection towards death) one (life)...which is what inspires one to resist, while tempting one to ignore resisting.

Combating Terrorism department

a) Department implies ones mind (ment) divided (de) as partial (part) within whole (perceivable) and from one another (suggested).

b) Terror (Latin terrere; to frighten; fear) implies ones consent to be afraid of the suggested terror-ism by another aka ones choice to ignore origin (perceivable) for outcome (suggested), which is why "fear is the mind-killer"...if mind/memory ignores adapting to origin, then it will utilize whatever is held within memory to supply outcomes.

Example...ignoring light as the origin tempts one to fill darkness with all the things unseen. Ones ignorance implies a shade over ones sight; hence casting ones surrounding into shadows, which draws the shady one and his suggestions.

c) Perceivable implies balance (need/want); suggested tempts ones choice to imbalance (want vs not want) self. Others utilize suggestion to tempt many ones into conflicts of "reason" against one another, hence striking (bat; batter) together (com).

sixth sense

a) SIX/SEX (Latin seco, to divide) SENSE/SENTIRE (to perceive)...being able to perceive implies as perception (partial) divided within perceivable (whole).

Others suggest names/numbers/counting etc. to tempt designated units (Latin unitas; unus; one) from discerning self by branding others.

b) One (partial) can only perceive oneness (whole)...anything suggested by other ones tempts one to ignore self for another, hence binding together aka collectivizing aka aggregating aka amalgamating etc.

c) All implies one in energy; hence addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and division (being partial within whole) of ONE.

d) Others suggest nihilism (0) and dualism (2) to distract from being (1)...ones consent to suggestions by another fuses fiction (dualism) while refusing (nihilism) reality.

don’t know where the idea came from

Knowledge implies perceivable inspiration; Ideal-ism implies suggested information...consenting to latter, tempts one to ignore former.

If the researchers understand the process, there may be ways to accelerate it

If one responds (re) to search for suggested outcomes, then perceivable origin (inception towards death) accelerates the destruction of ones being (life).

Ones consent to "stand-under" suggested; permits another to accelerate ones self destruction with suggested progressivism towards outcomes.

two conflicting sources on the subject.

Subjecting self (one) to another by consenting to suggested dualism (two) tempts one a) to ignore the only source (inception towards death) of being (life) and b) into a conflict of reason between two consenting parties about the suggested.

There's no conflict within source until subject chooses to ignore source (perceivable) for other subjects (suggested).

a motivated continuous effort to understand

Aka frequency of suggested information to tempt submission of resistance among others.

act effectively

Effect implies reaction (life); Cause implies action (inception towards death)...others suggest action to affect ones reaction.

Example...suggested actor following director; tempts one to ignore being reactor (life) within direction (inception towards death). A simple suggestion to invert perceivable within the minds of those consenting. It's that simple to exchange reality with fiction within memory...IF consent is given.

intuition

Aka being within (in) while having sight (tueri) of action/motion (tion)...others invert ones sight (perception) within action (perceivable) with tutors (suggestion), hence teaching ones sight what to watch aka what to focus/narrow ones sight to.

latency inhibition

a) Perceivable reality implies manifest (reveal); suggested fiction implies latent (conceal)...if one consents to ignore reality for fiction.

b) INHIB'IT, verb(Latin inhibeo; in and habeo, to hold) - "to restrain; to hinder; to check or repress"...ones consent to suggestions by another inhibits self to another ones exhibitions.

Sleight of hand: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".

My whole life I have believed there is more...

Only within whole (inception towards death) can there be partials (life)...claiming self (my); while holding onto (believe) suggestions by others, tempts partial to ignore whole, while focusing on nothing (ones denial of everything, as shaped as indulgeable nihilism by others).

for obvious reasons

Latin obvius - "that is in the way, presenting itself readily, open" aka perceivable inspiration...reasoning about suggested information makes one oblivious to it.

For implies forward aka that which forwards (inspection towards death) one (life)...which is what inspires one to resist, while tempting one to ignore resisting.

Combating Terrorism department

a) Department implies ones mind (ment) divided (de) as partial (part) within whole (perceivable) and from one another (suggested).

b) Terror (Latin terrere; to frighten; fear) implies ones consent to be afraid of the suggested terror-ism by another aka ones choice to ignore origin (perceivable) for outcome (suggested), which is why "fear is the mind-killer"...if mind/memory ignores adapting to origin, then it will utilize whatever is held within memory to supply outcomes.

Example...ignoring light as the origin tempts one to fill darkness with all the things unseen. Ones ignorance implies a shade over ones sight; hence casting ones surrounding into shadows, which draws the shady one and his suggestions.

c) Perceivable implies balance (need/want); suggested tempts ones choice to imbalance (want vs not want) self. Others utilize suggestion to tempt many ones into conflicts of "reason" against one another, hence striking (bat; batter) together (com).

sixth sense

a) SIX/SEX (Latin seco, to divide) SENSE/SENTIRE (to perceive)...being able to perceive implies as perception (partial) divided within perceivable (whole).

Others suggest names/numbers/counting etc. to tempt designated units (Latin unitas; unus; one) from discerning self by branding others.

b) One (partial) can only perceive oneness (whole)...anything suggested by other ones tempts one to ignore self for another, hence binding together aka collectivizing aka aggregating aka amalgamating etc.

c) All implies one in energy; hence addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and division (being partial within whole) of ONE.

d) Others suggest nihilism (0) and dualism (2) to distract from being (1)...ones consent to suggestions by another fuses fiction (dualism) while refusing (nihilism) reality.

don’t know where the idea came from

Knowledge implies perceivable inspiration; Ideal-ism implies suggested information...consenting to latter, tempts one to ignore former.

If the researchers understand the process, there may be ways to accelerate it

If one responds (re) to search for suggested outcomes, then perceivable origin (inception towards death) accelerates the destruction of ones being (life).

Ones consent to "stand-under" suggested; permits another to accelerate ones self destruction with suggested progressivism towards outcomes.

two conflicting sources on the subject.

Subjecting self (one) to another by consenting to suggested dualism (two) tempts one a) to ignore the only source (inception towards death) of being (life) and b) into a conflict of reason between two consenting parties about the suggested.

There's no conflict within source until subject chooses to ignore source (perceivable) for other subjects (suggested).

a motivated continuous effort to understand

Aka frequency of suggested information to tempt submission of resistance among others.

act effectively

Effect implies reaction (life); Cause implies action (inception towards death)...others suggest action to affect ones reaction.

Example...suggested actor following director; tempts one to ignore being reactor (life) within direction (inception towards death). A simple suggestion to invert perceivable within the minds of those consenting. It's that simple to exchange reality with fiction within memory...IF consent is given.

intuition

Aka being within (in) while having sight (tueri) of action/motion (tion)...others invert ones sight (perception) within action (perceivable) with tutors (suggestion), hence teach ones sight what to watch aka what to focus/narrow ones sight to.

latency inhibition

a) Perceivable reality implies manifest (reveal); suggested fiction implies latent (conceal)...if one consents to ignore reality for fiction.

b) INHIB'IT, verb(Latin inhibeo; in and habeo, to hold) - "to restrain; to hinder; to check or repress"...ones consent to suggestions by another inhibits self to another ones exhibitions.

Sleight of hand: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".

My whole life I have believed there is more...

Only within whole (inception towards death) can there be partials (life)...claiming self (my); while holding onto (believe) suggestions by others, tempts partial to ignore whole, while focusing on nothing (ones denial of everything, as shaped as indulgeable nihilism by others).