Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

When Albert Einstein held to the view that the relative relationship of one particle to another did not matter

Albert Einstein held no such view. In fact the relativity principle is the exact opposite: in his theory all that matters is relative motion.

His view then suggested that the redistribution of particles was not possible.

Citation sorely need. What is he talking about.

When a molecular structure breaks down there is a transfer of energy to the greatest part which is the attracting force

Said no chemical text book I've ever seen.

The teaching on the conservation of energy, which is that we never get something for nothing is the teaching accepted at the present time. This teaching stems from a statement by Albert Einstein, where he held to the view that the relative relationship of one particle to another did not matter

Uh, not even remotely true. A quick Google search shows that this law was first coined in the 1800s, with some similar ideas about energy even before that.

269 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

When Albert Einstein held to the view that the relative relationship of one particle to another did not matter

Albert Einstein held no such view. In fact the relativity principle is the exact opposite: in his theory all that matters is relative motion.

His view then suggested that the redistribution of particles was not possible.

Citation sorely need. What is he talking about.

When a molecular structure breaks down there is a transfer of energy to the greatest part which is the attracting force

Said no chemical text book I've ever seen.

The teaching on the conservation of energy, which is that we never get something for nothing is the teaching accepted at the present time. This teaching stems from a statement by Albert Einstein, where he held to the view that the relative relationship of one particle to another did not matter

Uh, not even remotely true. A quick Google search shows that this law was first coined in the 1800s which makes sense since so much progress on the concept of "energy" was made during that century.

270 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

When Albert Einstein held to the view that the relative relationship of one particle to another did not matter

Albert Einstein held no such view. In fact the relativity principle is the exact opposite: in his theory all that matters is relative motion.

His view then suggested that the redistribution of particles was not possible.

Citation sorely need. What is he talking about.

When a molecular structure breaks down there is a transfer of energy to the greatest part which is the attracting force

Said no chemical text book I've ever seen.

The teaching on the conservation of energy, which is that we never get something for nothing is the teaching accepted at the present time. This teaching stems from a statement by Albert Einstein, where he held to the view that the relative relationship of one particle to another did not matter

Uh, not even remotely true. A quick Google search shows that this law was first coined in the 1800s which makes sense since so much pioneering work on the concept of "energy" was done during that century.

270 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

When Albert Einstein held to the view that the relative relationship of one particle to another did not matter

Albert Einstein held no such view. In fact relativity principle is the exact opposite: in his theory all that matters is relative motion.

His view then suggested that the redistribution of particles was not possible.

Citation sorely need. What is he talking about.

When a molecular structure breaks down there is a transfer of energy to the greatest part which is the attracting force

Said no chemical text book I've ever seen.

The teaching on the conservation of energy, which is that we never get something for nothing is the teaching accepted at the present time. This teaching stems from a statement by Albert Einstein, where he held to the view that the relative relationship of one particle to another did not matter

Uh, not even remotely true. A quick Google search shows that this law was first coined in the 1800s which makes sense since so much pioneering work on the concept of "energy" was done during that century.

270 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

When Albert Einstein held to the view that the relative relationship of one particle to another did not matter

Albert Einstein held no such view. In fact relativity principle is the exact opposite: in his theory all that matters is relative motion.

270 days ago
1 score