Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Then stop acting like it!

Calling out your repeated disrespect is not the same as being offended. I can recognize when a person is trying to divert the topic as well as attempt to discredit me (both things can happen, they are not mutually exclusive) without being offended by it.

If anything, I'm just disappointed that you would rather resort to petty antics instead of addressing points directly. If you insist on carrying this assumption, which is showing disrespect by giving credence to such a silly idea, then it's best we move to a medium where we can be more confident

Really? In this scenario, on this site, in this conversation, you think there is a way to be 100% certain that you (or any online entity) is a bot?

Yes, I do. I know with 100% certainty that you are a human being that I have been interacting with.

it would only establish you weren't a bot in that particular interaction

And I would be thrilled to have that interaction with you. It would allow us to have the conversation in that particular interaction, and address our points more clearly!

You're making an excellent argument for why switching to video or audio would be the superior medium, so thank you! Now, it's a great opportunity for us to move to that medium.

I only care for productive conversation

Then let's have one in a medium where we can both be more confident that we are interacting with human beings.

The turing test can be applied to any entity purporting to be / presenting as human

The Turing test is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behavior indistinguishable from a human.

Every human, by default, including me, passes the Turing test because their behavior is, inherently, human.

No, there are no accusations of lies that you provided which contain links/citations/quotes of mine which were not already addressed, refuted, and you did not contest the refutations of.

I have, a number of times, quoted you directly. I urge you to go back and reread the conversation. If you missed the quote, it is not my responsibility to feed you the information again, I'm sorry to say.

311 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Then stop acting like it!

Calling out your repeated disrespect is not the same as being offended. I can recognize when a person is trying to divert the topic as well as attempt to discredit me (both things can happen, they are not mutually exclusive) without being offended by it.

If anything, I'm just disappointed that you would rather resort to petty antics instead of addressing points directly. If you insist on carrying this assumption, which is showing disrespect by giving credence to such a silly idea, then it's best we move to a medium where you can be more confident.

Really? In this scenario, on this site, in this conversation, you think there is a way to be 100% certain that you (or any online entity) is a bot?

Yes, I do. I know with 100% certainty that you are a human being that I have been interacting with.

it would only establish you weren't a bot in that particular interaction

And I would be thrilled to have that interaction with you. It would allow us to have the conversation in that particular interaction, and address our points more clearly!

You're making an excellent argument for why switching to video or audio would be the superior medium, so thank you! Now, it's a great opportunity for us to move to that medium.

I only care for productive conversation

Then let's have one in a medium where we can both be more confident that we are interacting with human beings.

The turing test can be applied to any entity purporting to be / presenting as human

The Turing test is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behavior indistinguishable from a human.

Every human, by default, including me, passes the Turing test because their behavior is, inherently, human.

No, there are no accusations of lies that you provided which contain links/citations/quotes of mine which were not already addressed, refuted, and you did not contest the refutations of.

I have, a number of times, quoted you directly. I urge you to go back and reread the conversation. If you missed the quote, it is not my responsibility to feed you the information again, I'm sorry to say.

312 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Then stop acting like it!

Calling out your repeated disrespect is not the same as being offended. I can recognize when a person is trying to divert the topic as well as attempt to discredit me (both things can happen, they are not mutually exclusive) without being offended by it.

If anything, I'm just disappointed that you would rather resort to petty antics instead of addressing points directly.

Really? In this scenario, on this site, in this conversation, you think there is a way to be 100% certain that you (or any online entity) is a bot?

Yes, I do. I know with 100% certainty that you are a human being that I have been interacting with.

it would only establish you weren't a bot in that particular interaction

And I would be thrilled to have that interaction with you. It would allow us to have the conversation in that particular interaction, and address our points more clearly!

You're making an excellent argument for why switching to video or audio would be the superior medium, so thank you! Now, it's a great opportunity for us to move to that medium.

I only care for productive conversation

Then let's have one in a medium where we can both be more confident that we are interacting with human beings.

The turing test can be applied to any entity purporting to be / presenting as human

The Turing test is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behavior indistinguishable from a human.

Every human, by default, including me, passes the Turing test because their behavior is, inherently, human.

No, there are no accusations of lies that you provided which contain links/citations/quotes of mine which were not already addressed, refuted, and you did not contest the refutations of.

I have, a number of times, quoted you directly. I urge you to go back and reread the conversation. If you missed the quote, it is not my responsibility to feed you the information again, I'm sorry to say.

312 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Then stop acting like it!

Calling out your repeated disrespect is not the same as being offended. I can recognize when a person is trying to divert the topic as well as attempt to discredit me (both things can happen, they are not mutually exclusive) without being offended by it.

If anything, I'm just disappointed that you would rather resort to petty antics instead of addressing points directly.

Really? In this scenario, on this site, in this conversation, you think there is a way to be 100% certain that you (or any online entity) is a bot?

Yes, I do. I know with 100% certainty that you are a human being that I have been interacting with.

it would only establish you weren't a bot in that particular interaction

And I would be thrilled to have that interaction with you. It would allow us to have the conversation in that particular interaction, and address our points more clearly!

You're making an excellent argument for why switching to video would be the superior medium, so thank you! Now, it's a great opportunity for us to move to that medium.

I only care for productive conversation

Then let's have one in a medium where we can both be more confident that we are interacting with human beings.

The turing test can be applied to any entity purporting to be / presenting as human

The Turing test is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behavior indistinguishable from a human.

Every human, by default, including me, passes the Turing test because their behavior is, inherently, human.

No, there are no accusations of lies that you provided which contain links/citations/quotes of mine which were not already addressed, refuted, and you did not contest the refutations of.

I have, a number of times, quoted you directly. I urge you to go back and reread the conversation. If you missed the quote, it is not my responsibility to feed you the information again, I'm sorry to say.

312 days ago
1 score