Within that line of reasoning, many Jews...

a) Are jews within gentiles line of reasoning or does a jew suggest consenting gentiles what to reason about?

b) Can you describe the difference between gentile line of reasoning and talmudic reasoning?

False dichotomies are everywhere

a) Perceivable surrounds each ones perception everywhere...reasoning (true vs false) about suggested tempts one to ignore that.

b) Consenting to suggested divides one into two (ignoring perceivable while consenting to suggested) aka a dichotomy.

c) Reasoning (true vs false) implies dichotomy aka one fighting other ones over suggested definitions.

d) Nature operates on implication (if/then)...which are not in conflict with one another, but implies same momentum (inception towards death) for each different matter (life) within.

Within that line of reasoning, many Jews...

a) Are jews within gentiles line of reasoning or does a jew suggest consenting gentiles what to reason about?

b) Can you describe the difference between gentile line of reasoning and talmudic reasoning?

False dichotomies are everywhere

a) Perceivable surrounds each ones perception everywhere...reasoning (true vs false) about suggested tempts one to ignore that.

b) Consenting to suggested divides one into two (ignoring perceivable while consenting to suggested) aka a dichotomy.

c) Reasoning (true vs false) implies dichotomy aka one fighting other ones over suggested definitions.

d) Nature operates on implication (if/then)...which are not in conflict with one another, but implies same momentum (inception towards death) for each matter (life) within.