"Aye, and if my grandmother had wheels she'd be a wagon"

Meaning your comment is (once again) an irrelevant aside/non-sequitur. And now you are doubling down because ... ?

The "fact" that most everyone learned or was exposed to was that eating fat was largely responsible for being/becoming fat. This is what i was saying was (and is) incorrect, and recognized that fact through research on the subject without replacing it with something new.

This is the nature of critical evaluation. The vast majority of the times you critically evaluate something to be incorrect, it does not lead to (and never provides, in and of the critical evaluation itself) the correct answer to replace it (that would sure be nice though!)

"Aye, and if my grandmother had wheels she'd be a wagon"

Meaning your comment is (once again) an irrelevant aside/non-sequitur. And now you are doubling down because ... ?

The "fact" that most everyone learned or was exposed to was that eating fat was largely responsible for being/becoming fat. This is what i was saying was (and is) incorrect, and recognized that fact through research on the subject without replacing it with something new.

This is the nature of critical evaluation. The vast majority of the times you critically evaluate something to be incorrect, it does not lead to the correct answer to replace it (that would sure be nice though!)

"Aye, and if my grandmother had wheels she'd be a wagon"

Meaning this is an irrelevant aside/non-sequitur. And now you are doubling down because ... ?

The "fact" that most everyone learned or was exposed to was that eating fat was largely responsible for being/becoming fat. This is what i was saying was (and is) incorrect, and recognized that fact through research on the subject without replacing it with something new.

This is the nature of critical evaluation. The vast majority of the times you critically evaluate something to be incorrect, it does not lead to the correct answer to replace it (that would sure be nice though!)