"squatting in it's granted region"
Wait, what? What region was granted with exclusivity in 1917?
But in reality I'd bet it's like any other agreement like that. England just wanted to CYA in writing. That's clear with how it was worded. But why the need to CYA with specificity like that? Did they have a hunch there would be an issue? Did they have more than a bunch?
Also, on that note, you didnt answer the conspiracy part. You claim you're seeking a conspiracy but ignore the part about US suddenly going from "meh." to "CHARGE!!" after the mandate. 1917. Would you say that US increased involvement (sacrifice) in 1917 was material in winning the war?
How long until womp womp black Friday? What happened there?
"squatting in it's granted region"
Wait, what? What region was granted with exclusivity in 1917?
But in reality I'd bet it's like any other agreement like that. England just wanted to CYA in writing. That's clear with how it was worded. But why the need to CYA with specificity like that? Did they have a hunch there would be an issue? Did they have more than a bunch?
Also, on that note, you didnt answer the conspiracy part. You claim you're seeking a conspiracy but ignore the part about US suddenly going from "meh." to "CHARGE!!" after the mandate. 1917. Would you say that US increased involvement (sacrifice) in 1917 was material in winning the war?
How long until womp womp black Friday? What happened there? Roosevelt? Good stuff.
"squatting in it's granted region"
Wait, what? What region was granted with exclusivity in 1917?
But in reality I'd bet it's like any other agreement like that. England just wanted to CYA in writing. That's clear with how it was worded. But why the need to CYA with specificity like that? Did they have a hunch there would be an issue?
Also, on that note, you didnt answer the conspiracy part. You claim you're seeking a conspiracy but ignore the part about US suddenly going from "meh." to "CHARGE!!" after the mandate. 1917. Would you say that US increased involvement (sacrifice) in 1917 was material in winning the war?
How long until womp womp black Friday? What happened there? Roosevelt? Good stuff.
"squatting in it's granted region"
Wait, what? What region was granted with exclusivity in 1917?
But in reality I'd bet it's like any other agreement like that. England just wanted to CYA in writing. That's clear with how it was worded.
Also, on that note, you didnt answer the conspiracy part. You claim you're seeking a conspiracy but ignore the part about US suddenly going from "meh." to "CHARGE!!" after the mandate. 1917. Would you say that US increased involvement (sacrifice) in 1917 was material in winning the war?
How long until womp womp black Friday? What happened there? Roosevelt? Good stuff.
"squatting in it's granted region"
Wait, what? What region was granted with exclusivity in 1917?
But it reality I'd bet it's like any other agreement like that. England just wanted to CYA in writing. That's clear with how it was worded.
Also, on that note, you didnt answer the conspiracy part. You claim you're seeking a conspiracy but ignore the part about US suddenly going from "meh." to "CHARGE!!" after the mandate. 1917. Would you say that US increased involvement (sacrifice) in 1917 was material in winning the war?
How long until womp womp black Friday? What happened there? Roosevelt? Good stuff.
"squatting in it's granted region"
Wait, what? What region was granted with exclusivity in 2017?
But it reality I'd bet it's like any other agreement like that. England just wanted to CYA in writing. That's clear with how it was worded.
Also, on that note, you didnt answer the conspiracy part. You claim you're seeking a conspiracy but ignore the part about US suddenly going from "meh." to "CHARGE!!" after the mandate. 1917. Would you say that US increased involvement (sacrifice) in 1917 was material in winning the war?
How long until womp womp black Friday? What happened there? Roosevelt? Good stuff.