Curiously has it been conformed now, and why. It was obvious at the time. Although the who and how and why was inconclusive.

Ukraine specifically flopped on Russian build up. Zelenskyy literally said he was willing to conceed the Donbass, the Crimea, and not join Nato. It's in the press prior to an escalation also at the further summit.

Suddenly billions arrived in aid and that tone changed rapidly.

But I suppose the rather quick extermination of anti tanks and failed negotiation with paratroopers changed and tone.

Again there was further thought to certain terms, although Zelenskyy became stanch on Nato, its security after conflict occurred. As aid arrived by the billions. At this point the Capital and language changed names.

Then the supposed warcrimes occurred, cementing patriotism, and Mauripol was taken.

It's in the press specific statements, the backflipping of any rhetorical suggestion, specifically as aid and arm packages arrive. Obviously there are delaying tactics, and also negotiating on an issue that cannot be solved now. Ukrainian coastline. Hence Crimea was always sanctioned prior to any supposed conflict.

Has this topic confirmed the obvious speculation? Or is it also speculating?

Europe will also have to step up filling in a potential gap of funding as another conflict rears. Hence any supposed press.

In any speculation there's far too much bullshit to trust the press , it obviously airs propaganda that has objections.

But at this point, what's that endgame and what exactly is the narrative. It is almost beyond negotiation.

There is no deal now on one for the other. They are almost inevitably interlinked. They were years prior when any Euromaidan occurred.

I wish it were as simple as pied piper. But any sides have further developed. Or is there peace for another 5 minutes? The climate, promise, guys, peace.

Something still stinks. In its occurrence. Can't put a buzzer on it. Any can. The tactics of Ukraine have been for negotiation, or attrition, and not for its annihilation. Why therefore does it continue to develop if there weren't another construct provoking its rat armies as agenda swings, advances, stalls, escalates, into? The dumbest being fiddled.

Curiously has it been conformed now, and why. It was obvious at the time. Although the who and how and why was inconclusive.

Ukraine specifically flopped on Russian build up. Zelenskyy literally said he was willing to conceed the Donbass, the Crimea, and not join Nato. It's in the press prior to an escalation also at the further summit.

Suddenly billions arrived in aid and that tone changed rapidly.

But I suppose the rather quick extermination of anti tanks and failed negotiation with paratroopers changed and tone.

Again there was further thought to certain terms, although Zelenskyy became stanch on Nato, its security after conflict occurred. As aid arrived by the billions. At this point the Capital and language changed names.

Then the supposed warcrimes occurred, cementing patriotism, and Mauripol was taken.

It's in the press specific statements, the backflipping of any rhetorical suggestion, specifically as aid and arm packages arrive. Obviously there are delaying tactics, and also negotiating on an issue that cannot be solved now. Ukrainian coastline. Hence Crimea was always sanctioned prior to any supposed conflict.

Has this topic confirmed the obvious speculation? Or is it also speculating?

Europe will also have to step up filling in a potential gap of funding as another conflict rears. Hence any supposed press.

In any speculation there's far too much bullshit to trust the press , it obviously airs propaganda that has objections.

But at this point, what's that endgame and what exactly is the narrative. It is almost beyond negotiation.

There is no deal now on one for the other. They are almost inevitably interlinked. They were years prior when any Euromaidan occurred.

I wish it were as simple as pied piper. But any sides have further developed. Or is there peace for another 5 minutes? The climate, promise, guys, peace.

Something still stinks. In its occurrence. Can't put a buzzer on it. Any can. The tactics of Ukraine have been for negotiation, or attrition, and not for its annihilation. Why therefore does it continue to develop if there weren't another construct provoking its rat armies?

Curiously has it been conformed now, and why. It was obvious at the time. Although the who and how and why was inconclusive.

Ukraine specifically flopped on Russian build up. Zelenskyy literally said he was willing to conceed the Donbass, the Crimea, and not join Nato. It's in the press prior to an escalation also at the further summit.

Suddenly billions arrived in aid and that tone changed rapidly.

But I suppose the rather quick extermination of anti tanks and failed negotiation with paratroopers changed and tone.

Again there was further thought to certain terms, although Zelenskyy became stanch on Nato, its security after conflict occurred. As aid arrived by the billions. At this point the Capital and language changed names.

Then the supposed warcrimes occurred, cementing patriotism, and Mauripol was taken.

It's in the press specific statements, the backflipping of any rhetorical suggestion, specifically as aid and arm packages arrive. Obviously there are delaying tactics, and also negotiating on an issue that cannot be solved now. Ukrainian coastline. Hence Crimea was always sanctioned prior to any supposed conflict.

Has this topic confirmed the obvious speculation? Or is it also speculating?

Europe will also have to step up filling in a potential gap of funding as another conflict rears. Hence any supposed press.

In any speculation there's far too much bullshit to trust the press , it obviously airs propaganda that has objections.

But at this point, what's that endgame and what exactly is the narrative. It is almost beyond negotiation.

There is no deal now on one for the other. They are almost inevitably interlinked. They were years prior when any Euromaidan occurred.

I wish it were as simple as pied piper. But any sides have further developed. Or is there peace for another 5 minutes? The climate, promise, guys, peace.

Curiously has it been conformed now, and why. It was obvious at the time. Although the who and how and why was inconclusive.

Ukraine specifically flopped on Russian build up. Zelenskyy literally said he was willing to conceed the Donbass, the Crimea, and not join Nato. It's in the press prior to an escalation also at the further summit.

Suddenly billions arrived in aid and that tone changed rapidly.

But I suppose the rather quick extermination of anti tanks and failed negotiation with paratroopers changed and tone.

Again there was further thought to certain terms, although Zelenskyy became stanch on Nato, its security after conflict occurred. As aid arrived by the billions. At this point the Capital and language changed names.

Then the supposed warcrimes occurred, cementing patriotism, and Mauripol was taken.

It's in the press specific statements, the backflipping of any rhetorical suggestion, specifically as aid and arm packages arrive. Obviously there are delaying tactics, and also negotiating on an issue that cannot be solved now. Ukrainian coastline. Hence Crimea was always sanctioned prior to any supposed conflict.

Has this topic confirmed the obvious speculation? Or is it also speculating?

Europe will also have to step up filling in a potential gap of funding as another conflict rears. Hence any supposed press.

In any speculation there's far too much bullshit to trust the press , it obviously airs propaganda that has objections.

But at this point, what's that endgame and what exactly is the narrative. It is almost beyond negotiation.

There is no deal now on one for the other. They are almost inevitably interlinked. They were years prior when any Euromaidan occurred.

I wish it were as simple as pied piper. But any sides have further developed. Or is there peace for another 5 minutes?

Curiously has it been conformed now, and why. It was obvious at the time. Although the who and how and why was inconclusive.

Ukraine specifically flopped on Russian build up. Zelenskyy literally said he was willing to conceed the Donbass, the Crimea, and not join Nato. It's in the press prior to an escalation also at the further summit.

Suddenly billions arrived in aid and that tone changed rapidly.

But I suppose the rather quick extermination of anti tanks and failed negotiation with paratroopers changed and tone.

Again there was further thought to certain terms, although Zelenskyy became stanch on Nato, its security after conflict occurred. As aid arrived by the billions. At this point the Capital and language changed names.

Then the supposed warcrimes occurred, cementing patriotism, and Mauripol was taken.

It's in the press specific statements, the backflipping of any rhetorical suggestion, specifically as aid and arm packages arrive. Obviously there are delaying tactics, and also negotiating on an issue that cannot be solved now. Ukrainian coastline. Hence Crimea was always sanctioned prior to any supposed conflict.

Has this topic confirmed the obvious speculation? Or is it also speculating?

Europe will also have to step up filling in a potential gap of funding as another conflict rears. Hence any supposed press.

In any speculation there's far too much bullshit to trust the press , it obviously airs propaganda that has objections.

But at this point, what's that endgame and what exactly is the narrative. It is almost beyond negotiation.

There is no deal now on one for the other. They are almost inevitably interlinked. They were years prior when any Euromaidan occurred.

I wish it were as simple as pied piper. But any sides have further developed.

Curiously has it been conformed now, and why. It was obvious at the time. Although the who and how and why was inconclusive.

Ukraine specifically flopped on Russian build up. Zelenskyy literally said he was willing to conceed the Donbass, the Crimea, and not join Nato. It's in the press prior to an escalation also at the further summit.

Suddenly billions arrived in aid and that tone changed rapidly.

But I suppose the rather quick extermination of anti tanks and failed negotiation with paratroopers changed and tone.

Again there was further thought to certain terms, although Zelenskyy became stanch on Nato, its security after conflict occurred. As aid arrived by the billions. At this point the Capital and language changed names.

Then the supposed warcrimes occurred, cementing patriotism, and Mauripol was taken.

It's in the press specific statements, the backflipping of any rhetorical suggestion, specifically as aid and arm packages arrive. Obviously there are delaying tactics, and also negotiating on an issue that cannot be solved now. Ukrainian coastline. Hence Crimea was always sanctioned prior to any supposed conflict.

Has this topic confirmed the obvious speculation? Or is it also speculating?

Europe will also have to step up filling in a potential gap of funding as another conflict rears. Hence any supposed press.

In any speculation there's far too much bullshit to trust the press , it obviously airs propaganda that has objections.

But at this point, what's that endgame and what exactly is the narrative. It is almost beyond negotiation.

There is no deal now on one for the other. They are almost inevitably interlinked.

I wish it were as simple as pied piper. But any sides have further developed.

Curiously has it been conformed now, and why. It was obvious at the time. Although the who and how and why was inconclusive.

Ukraine specifically flopped on Russian build up. Zelenskyy literally said he was willing to conceed the Donbass, the Crimea, and not join Nato. It's in the press prior to an escalation also at the further summit.

Suddenly billions arrived in aid and that tone changed rapidly.

But I suppose the rather quick extermination of anti tanks and failed negotiation with paratroopers changed and tone.

Again there was further thought to certain terms, although Zelenskyy became stanch on Nato, its security after conflict occurred. As aid arrived by the billions. At this point the Capital and language changed names.

Then the supposed warcrimes occurred, cementing patriotism, and Mauripol was taken.

It's in the press specific statements, the backflipping of any rhetorical suggestion, specifically as aid and arm packages arrive. Obviously there are delaying tactics, and also negotiating on an issue that cannot be solved now. Ukrainian coastline. Hence Crimea was always sanctioned prior to any supposed conflict.

Has this topic confirmed the obvious speculation? Or is it also speculating?

Europe will also have to step up filling in a potential gap of funding as another conflict rears. Hence any supposed press

Curiously has it been conformed now, and why. It was obvious at the time. Although the who and how and why was inconclusive.

Ukraine specifically flopped on Russian build up. Zelenskyy literally said he was willing to conceed the Donbass, the Crimea, and not join Nato. It's in the press prior to an escalation also at the further summit.

Suddenly billions arrived in aid and that tone changed rapidly.

But I suppose the rather quick extermination of anti tanks and failed negotiation with paratroopers changed and tone.

Again there was further thought to certain terms, although Zelenskyy became stanch on Nato, its security after conflict occurred. As aid arrived by the billions. At this point the Capital and language changed names.

Then the supposed warcrimes occurred, cementing patriotism, and Mauripol was taken.

It's in the press specific statements, the backflipping of any rhetorical suggestion, specifically as aid and arm packages arrive. Obviously there are delaying tactics, and also negotiating on an issue that cannot be solved now. Ukrainian coastline. Hence Crimea was always sanctioned prior to any supposed conflict.

Has this topic confirmed the obvious speculation? Or is it also speculating?

Europe will also have to step up filling in a potential gap of funding as another conflict rears.

Curiously has it been conformed now, and why. It was obvious at the time. Although the who and how and why was inconclusive.

Ukraine specifically flopped on Russian build up. Zelenskyy literally said he was willing to conceed the Donbass, the Crimea, and not join Nato. It's in the press prior to an escalation also at the further summit.

Suddenly billions arrived in aid and that tone changed rapidly.

But I suppose the rather quick extermination of anti tanks and failed negotiation with paratroopers changed and tone.

Again there was further thought to certain terms, although Zelenskyy became stanch on Nato, its security after conflict occurred. As aid arrived by the billions. At this point the Capital and language changed names.

Then the supposed warcrimes occurred, cementing patriotism, and Mauripol was taken.

It's in the press specific statements, the backflipping of any rhetorical suggestion, specifically as aid and arm packages arrive. Obviously there are delaying tactics, and also negotiating on an issue that cannot be solved now. Ukrainian coastline. Hence Crimea was always sanctioned prior to any supposed conflict.

Has this topic confirmed the obvious speculation?