I had mentioned a few months ago I watched that old movie 10000 bc, by that strange director Roland Emmerich.
Anyway they mention in that movie that the rulers of egypt supposedly came from the sky, and that their home was buried in the sea and the survivors went to egypt and started to build this huge pyramid.
In Atlantis: the Antediluvian World, the author ignatius mentions that the main theory at that time is the rulers of egypt came from atlantis. So this isnt just some made up thing he put in the movie.
If thats the case, it really is about keeping the bloodline as pure as possible. This is why alot of these really rich people have such terrible health problems I bet.
https://youtu.be/ZgDoW6eUMVk?t=271
From what i have researched about this video, it seems legit. Most of it anyway, like the link between egyptian and roman royalty. The best answer I could find was on quora, but its not really proof lol.
Although most of Europe is related to Pharoahs in some way, there is always a direct bloodline that holds huge importance to their heritage. I'd assume because the family has issues regarding the rules of hier that makes the direct blood not so direct but still the same bloodline. That's why Diana is related to Churchill, Ellen is related to the queen. I mean so is Hilary duff. The elites are the bloodline and some more important than others deriving from Egypt and Rome.
LMAO, this article kinda ties in what I was saying.
And don’t forget about the Egyptian pharaoh Tutankhamun, aka King Tut. Half of all men living in western Europe are related to him, geneticists in Switzerland say, including up to 70% of men in Great Britain.
King Tut left something else behind as well: a legacy of inbreeding, genetic deformities and recessive ailments.
In royal families in ancient Egypt – and in many dynasties around the world, for much of human history – brothers and sisters were expected to marry, to keep the bloodline pure. This led to homozygosity — two identical forms of a gene, one inherited from each parent — which can cause a host of genetic woes: hemophilia, cystic fibrosis, Habsburg jaw, facial asymmetry, suppressed immune systems and certain kinds of cancer.
King Tut himself is an example. Born to parents who were brother and sister, he had a club foot, a cleft palate, scoliosis and missing bones in his feet. Geneticists think that when he died, around 1324 BC, sickle-cell disease – an inherited blood disorder – was the culprit. (Cleopatra, the last pharaoh, was married to her own brother, too.)
See, I only sound crazy if you dont take the time to understand what I am talking about. (comment mainly aimed at the lurkers)
In that wing family dna project, they mention the dna was sampled against a wing from england and it shows that they shared a common ancestor from something like 10,000 years ago.
Genetics is really weird.
It is interesting to note the etymology of the two Wing villages. It appears the village of Wing in Rutlandshire was located in the Danelaw (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danelaw), and was likely settled by the Scandanavian Vikings during the 9th Century. The village of Wing in Buckinghamshire was outside of the Danelaw, and appears to have been settled by the Anglo-Saxons (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Anglo-Saxon_England). The surname of Wing does not properly belong to a single family. DNA testing has shown that the common ancestor of different Wing families likely lived more than 10,000 years ago (long before the adoption of surnames).
One of our participants had a deep haplogroup testing performed. The tests results revealed our haplogroup is R-L48. This haplogroup is a subset of the WAMH (Western Atlantic Modal Haplogroup -- the most common haplogroup in Western Europe). The R1b-L48 haplogroup is quite common (which makes some comparisons difficult). The haplotypes of the family closely conform the the "Frisian" Modal group discovered several years ago. Ancient Frisia was roughly where The Netherlands are today. It is likely our early ancestors were from Frisia before emigrating to Britain.
The point im making here, even though we all come from a small pool of people, and these same bloodlines that have been ruling for millennia are still ruling us. Its not as simple as saying, well were all related to kings and queens! Yeah that may be true, but most familys are like the descendants of these wing familys. They married for love, not money or bloodlines. Which is still something india does today with arranged marriages to keep the caste system strong. None of us got the bank account that comes with being a direct descendant.
But hey at least I had my health, until some fuckhead greedy twat wrecked it, but I guess its just another bullshit life lesson to learn lmao.
I had mentioned a few months ago I watched that old movie 10000 bc, by that strange director Roland Emmerich.
Anyway they mention in that movie that the rulers of egypt supposedly came from the sky, and that their home was buried in the sea and the survivors went to egypt and started to build this huge pyramid.
In Atlantis: the Antediluvian World, the author ignatius mentions that the main theory at that time is the rulers of egypt came from atlantis. So this isnt just some made up thing he put in the movie.
If thats the case, it really is about keeping the bloodline as pure as possible. This is why alot of these really rich people have such terrible health problems I bet.
https://youtu.be/ZgDoW6eUMVk?t=271
From what i have researched about this video, it seems legit. Most of it anyway, like the link between egyptian and roman royalty. The best answer I could find was on quora, but its not really proof lol.
Although most of Europe is related to Pharoahs in some way, there is always a direct bloodline that holds huge importance to their heritage. I'd assume because the family has issues regarding the rules of hier that makes the direct blood not so direct but still the same bloodline. That's why Diana is related to Churchill, Ellen is related to the queen. I mean so is Hilary duff. The elites are the bloodline and some more important than others deriving from Egypt and Rome.
LMAO, this article kinda ties in what I was saying.
And don’t forget about the Egyptian pharaoh Tutankhamun, aka King Tut. Half of all men living in western Europe are related to him, geneticists in Switzerland say, including up to 70% of men in Great Britain.
King Tut left something else behind as well: a legacy of inbreeding, genetic deformities and recessive ailments.
In royal families in ancient Egypt – and in many dynasties around the world, for much of human history – brothers and sisters were expected to marry, to keep the bloodline pure. This led to homozygosity — two identical forms of a gene, one inherited from each parent — which can cause a host of genetic woes: hemophilia, cystic fibrosis, Habsburg jaw, facial asymmetry, suppressed immune systems and certain kinds of cancer.
King Tut himself is an example. Born to parents who were brother and sister, he had a club foot, a cleft palate, scoliosis and missing bones in his feet. Geneticists think that when he died, around 1324 BC, sickle-cell disease – an inherited blood disorder – was the culprit. (Cleopatra, the last pharaoh, was married to her own brother, too.)
See, I only sound crazy if you dont take the time to understand what I am talking about. (comment mainly aimed at the lurkers)
In that wing family dna project, they mention the dna was sampled against a wing from england and it shows that they shared a common ancestor from something like 10,000 years ago.
Genetics is really weird.
It is interesting to note the etymology of the two Wing villages. It appears the village of Wing in Rutlandshire was located in the Danelaw (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danelaw), and was likely settled by the Scandanavian Vikings during the 9th Century. The village of Wing in Buckinghamshire was outside of the Danelaw, and appears to have been settled by the Anglo-Saxons (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Anglo-Saxon_England). The surname of Wing does not properly belong to a single family. DNA testing has shown that the common ancestor of different Wing families likely lived more than 10,000 years ago (long before the adoption of surnames).
One of our participants had a deep haplogroup testing performed. The tests results revealed our haplogroup is R-L48. This haplogroup is a subset of the WAMH (Western Atlantic Modal Haplogroup -- the most common haplogroup in Western Europe). The R1b-L48 haplogroup is quite common (which makes some comparisons difficult). The haplotypes of the family closely conform the the "Frisian" Modal group discovered several years ago. Ancient Frisia was roughly where The Netherlands are today. It is likely our early ancestors were from Frisia before emigrating to Britain.
I had mentioned a few months ago I watched that old movie 10000 bc, by that strange director Roland Emmerich.
Anyway they mention in that movie that the rulers of egypt supposedly came from the sky, and that their home was buried in the sea and the survivors went to egypt and started to build this huge pyramid.
In Atlantis: the Antediluvian World, the author ignatius mentions that the main theory at that time is the rulers of egypt came from atlantis. So this isnt just some made up thing he put in the movie.
If thats the case, it really is about keeping the bloodline as pure as possible. This is why alot of these really rich people have such terrible health problems I bet.
https://youtu.be/ZgDoW6eUMVk?t=271
From what i have researched about this video, it seems legit. Most of it anyway, like the link between egyptian and roman royalty. The best answer I could find was on quora, but its not really proof lol.
Although most of Europe is related to Pharoahs in some way, there is always a direct bloodline that holds huge importance to their heritage. I'd assume because the family has issues regarding the rules of hier that makes the direct blood not so direct but still the same bloodline. That's why Diana is related to Churchill, Ellen is related to the queen. I mean so is Hilary duff. The elites are the bloodline and some more important than others deriving from Egypt and Rome.
LMAO, this article kinda ties in what I was saying.
And don’t forget about the Egyptian pharaoh Tutankhamun, aka King Tut. Half of all men living in western Europe are related to him, geneticists in Switzerland say, including up to 70% of men in Great Britain.
King Tut left something else behind as well: a legacy of inbreeding, genetic deformities and recessive ailments.
In royal families in ancient Egypt – and in many dynasties around the world, for much of human history – brothers and sisters were expected to marry, to keep the bloodline pure. This led to homozygosity — two identical forms of a gene, one inherited from each parent — which can cause a host of genetic woes: hemophilia, cystic fibrosis, Habsburg jaw, facial asymmetry, suppressed immune systems and certain kinds of cancer.
King Tut himself is an example. Born to parents who were brother and sister, he had a club foot, a cleft palate, scoliosis and missing bones in his feet. Geneticists think that when he died, around 1324 BC, sickle-cell disease – an inherited blood disorder – was the culprit. (Cleopatra, the last pharaoh, was married to her own brother, too.)
See, I only sound crazy if you dont take the time to understand what I am talking about. (comment mainly aimed at the lurkers)
In that wing family dna project, they mention the dna was sampled against a wing from england and it shows that they shared a common ancestor from something like 10,000 years ago.
Genetics is really weird.
I had mentioned a few months ago I watched that old movie 10000 bc, by that strange director Roland Emmerich.
Anyway they mention in that movie that the rulers of egypt supposedly came from the sky, and that their home was buried in the sea and the survivors went to egypt and started to build this huge pyramid.
In Atlantis: the Antediluvian World, the author ignatius mentions that the main theory at that time is the rulers of egypt came from atlantis. So this isnt just some made up thing he put in the movie.
If thats the case, it really is about keeping the bloodline as pure as possible. This is why alot of these really rich people have such terrible health problems I bet.
https://youtu.be/ZgDoW6eUMVk?t=271
From what i have researched about this video, it seems legit. Most of it anyway, like the link between egyptian and roman royalty. The best answer I could find was on quora, but its not really proof lol.
Although most of Europe is related to Pharoahs in some way, there is always a direct bloodline that holds huge importance to their heritage. I'd assume because the family has issues regarding the rules of hier that makes the direct blood not so direct but still the same bloodline. That's why Diana is related to Churchill, Ellen is related to the queen. I mean so is Hilary duff. The elites are the bloodline and some more important than others deriving from Egypt and Rome.
LMAO, this article kinda ties in what I was saying.
King Tut left something else behind as well: a legacy of inbreeding, genetic deformities and recessive ailments.
In royal families in ancient Egypt – and in many dynasties around the world, for much of human history – brothers and sisters were expected to marry, to keep the bloodline pure. This led to homozygosity — two identical forms of a gene, one inherited from each parent — which can cause a host of genetic woes: hemophilia, cystic fibrosis, Habsburg jaw, facial asymmetry, suppressed immune systems and certain kinds of cancer.
King Tut himself is an example. Born to parents who were brother and sister, he had a club foot, a cleft palate, scoliosis and missing bones in his feet. Geneticists think that when he died, around 1324 BC, sickle-cell disease – an inherited blood disorder – was the culprit. (Cleopatra, the last pharaoh, was married to her own brother, too.)
See, I only sound crazy if you dont take the time to understand what I am talking about. (comment mainly aimed at the lurkers)
I had mentioned a few months ago I watched that old movie 10000 bc, by that strange director Roland Emmerich.
Anyway they mention in that movie that the rulers of egypt supposedly came from the sky, and that their home was buried in the sea and the survivors went to egypt and started to build this huge pyramid.
In Atlantis: the Antediluvian World, the author ignatius mentions that the main theory at that time is the rulers of egypt came from atlantis. So this isnt just some made up thing he put in the movie.
If thats the case, it really is about keeping the bloodline as pure as possible. This is why alot of these really rich people have such terrible health problems I bet.
https://youtu.be/ZgDoW6eUMVk?t=271
From what i have researched about this video, it seems legit. Most of it anyway, like the link between egyptian and roman royalty. The best answer I could find was on quora, but its not really proof lol.
Although most of Europe is related to Pharoahs in some way, there is always a direct bloodline that holds huge importance to their heritage. I'd assume because the family has issues regarding the rules of hier that makes the direct blood not so direct but still the same bloodline. That's why Diana is related to Churchill, Ellen is related to the queen. I mean so is Hilary duff. The elites are the bloodline and some more important than others deriving from Egypt and Rome.
I had mentioned a few months ago I watched that old movie 10000 bc, by that strange director Roland Emmerich.
Anyway they mention in that movie that the rulers of egypt supposedly came from the sky, and that their home was buried in the sea and the survivors went to egypt and started to build this huge pyramid.
In Atlantis: the Antediluvian World, the author ignatius mentions that the main theory at that time is the rulers of egypt came from atlantis. So this isnt just some made up thing he put in the movie.
If thats the case, it really is about keeping the bloodline as pure as possible. This is why alot of these really rich people have such terrible health problems I bet.
https://youtu.be/ZgDoW6eUMVk?t=271
From what i have researched about this video, it seems legit.
I had mentioned a few months ago I watched that old movie 10000 bc, by that strange director Roland Emmerich.
Anyway they mention in that movie that the rulers of egypt supposedly came from the sky, and that their home was buried in the sea and the survivors went to egypt and started to build this huge pyramid.
In Atlantis: the Antediluvian World, the author ignatius mentions that the main theory at that time is the rulers of egypt came from atlantis. So this isnt just some made up thing he put in the movie.
If thats the case, it really is about keeping the bloodline as pure as possible. This is why alot of these really rich people have such terrible health problems I bet.