Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

No.

In fact there's evidence to suggest, the Greeks who are responsible for the New Testament. The Vatican version. Put in all that miracle, superpower stuff, because they'd been doing it for centuries with their pantheon. In fact in other version's of the time period, none. Or possibly even a resurrection. Hence Thomas's omission. Quite possibly Magdalene's. And suggestively he was also married.

In the Koran he doesn't resurrect either.

Resurrection provides the basis of an afterlife, his divinity. Without it you technically don't have Jesus the son of God. Instead he's another prophet, or priest. What I mean by resurrection, isn't the metaphysical, but actually taken from our physical dimension. When in fact it was a metaphor in the other version of the period. Like the Egyptian it was taken from. On death the soul transcends to its judgement. Heaven, hell, or inbetween. The new testament Christ redeems, forgives, saves humanity if it accepts salvation. In the other version it had its own disciples, different. Less apostles other gospels. But Christ didn't offer the wicked redemption. No resurrection.

Apparently Christianity like Islam's Koran civil warred over the version published for longer.

Like a tapestry there's a much bigger pattern of where and how it formed. It takes a lot of study into what it replaced.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No.

In fact there's evidence to suggest, the Greeks who are responsible for the New Testament. The Vatican version. Put in all that miracle, superpower stuff, because they'd been doing it for centuries with their pantheon. In fact in other version's of the time period, none. Or possibly even a resurrection. Hence Thomas's omission. Quite possibly Magdalene's. And suggestively he was also married.

In the Koran he doesn't resurrect either.

Resurrection provides the basis of an afterlife, his divinity. Without it you technically don't have Jesus the son of God. Instead he's another prophet, or priest. What I mean by resurrection, isn't the metaphysical, but actually taken from our physical dimension. When in fact it was a metaphor in the other version of the period. Like the Egyptian it was taken from. On death the soul transcends to its judgement. Heaven, hell, or inbetween. The new testament Christ redeems, forgives, saves humanity if it accepts salvation. In the other version it had its own disciples, different. Less apostles other gospels. But Christ didn't offer the wicked redemption. No resurrection.

Apparently Christisnity like Islam's Koran civil warred over the version published for longer.

Like a tapestry there's a much bigger pattern of where and how it formed. It takes a lot of study into what it replaced.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No.

In fact there's evidence to suggest, the Greeks who are responsible for the New Testament. The Vatican version. Put in all that miracle, superpower stuff, because they'd been doing it for centuries with their pantheon. In fact in other version's of the time period, none. Or possibly even a resurrection. Hence Thomas's omission. Quite possibly Magdalene's. And suggestively he was also married.

In the Koran he doesn't resurrect either.

Resurrection provides the basis of an afterlife, his divinity. Without it you technically don't have Jesus the son of God. Instead he's another prophet, or priest. What I mean by resurrection, isn't the metaphysical, but actually taken from our physical dimension. When in fact it was a metaphor in the other version of the period. Like the Egyptian it was taken from. On death the soul transcends to its judgement. Hevean, hell, or inbetween. The new testament Christ redeems, forgives, saves humanity if it accepts salvation. In the other version it had its own disciples, different. Less apostles other gospels. But Christ didn't offer the wicked redemption. No resurrection.

Apparently Christisnity like Islam's Koran civil warred over the version published for longer.

Like a tapestry there's a much bigger pattern of where and how it formed. It takes a lot of study into what it replaced.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No.

In fact there's evidence to suggest, the Greeks who are responsible for the New Testament. The Vatican version. Put in all that miracle, superpower stuff, because they'd been doing it for centuries with their pantheon. In fact in other version's of the time period, none. Or possibly even a resurrection. Hence Thomas's omission. Quite possibly Magdalene's. And suggestively he was also married.

In the Koran he doesn't resurrect either.

Resurrection provides the basis of an afterlife, his divinity. Without it you technically don't have Jesus the son of God. Instead he's another prophet, or priest. What I mean by resurrection, isn't the metaphysical, but actually taken from our physical dimension. When in fact it was a metaphor in the other version of the period. Like the Egyptian it was taken from. On death the soul transcends to its judgement. Hevean, hell, or inbetween. The new testament Christ redeems, forgives, saves humanity if it accepts salvation. In the other version it had its own disciples, different. Less apostles other gospels. But Christ didn't offer the wicked redemption. No resurrection.

Apparently Christisnity like Islam civil warred over the version published for longer.

Like a tapestry there's a much bigger pattern of where and how it formed. It takes a lot of study into what it replaced.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

No.

In fact there's evidence to suggest, the Greeks who are responsible for the New Testament. The Vatican version. Put in all that miracle, superpower stuff, because they'd been doing it for centuries with their pantheon. In fact in other version's of the time period, none. Or possibly even a resurrection. Hence Thomas's omission. Quite possibly Magdalene's. And suggestively he was also married.

In the Koran he doesn't resurrect either.

Resurrection provides the basis of an afterlife, his divinity. Without it you technically don't have Jesus the son of God. Instead he's another prophet, or priest. What I mean by resurrection, isn't the metaphysical, but actually taken from our physical dimension. When in fact it was a metaphor in the other version of the period. Like the Egyptian it was taken from.

1 year ago
1 score