Except no. The satellite weapons are still anti satellite, with the potential to knock out re-entry vehicles, missiles, and sooner re-entry drones. Those drones will also be fitted with them. They're big ass unmmaned jets effectively. For re-entry. It's 7th gen or test stages, they have had smaller success as drones. If missiles still used as anti Sat killers are being replaced by that kind of space weapon. We're still talking time. Or syfi. 6th gen is only just entering the battlefield. Most nations are still prototype stages. It isn't re-entry. Perhaps it has the potential to reach upper orbit the Russians can on some 5th gen fighters, but they don't pop up in Antarctica yet. They won't on 6th gen either.

The problem I have is the forensics. The superheated burn spots. Simply put when you touch something hot you get burnt, the contact trace point of the source. Every fire is this. The contact point of where the fire started. With lasers it's superhot. It either tears through the object punching a hole, or it bores through it like a drill. On metals there are distinct burn patterns, where it superheated boring through the metal until whatever combustibles encased ignited or explodes. So when you have a bunch of cars and metal roofs supposedly being hit by a satellite above it, where are the trace points? Perhaps it was lost in the blaze, side car doors, window, but there would still be this forensic evidence on the thousands of cars.

There is no laser that can fire in nanoseconds at 2200 houses and how many cars and boats. Average what 5000 times. No laser fired off that many shots or even 50x gigawatt/megawatt shots. Not from a satellite. No way. Not in that window it needs to charge. Or you need a huge fucking power source and cooling. Impossibly.

The moon the rovers did it? Like India's lunar landing. Come on.

Instead the aluminium cars like in California, Canada, Stralia, Greece melted because they're made out of increasing alloys, and the houses aswell are full of combustibles. The trees are often more fireproof. See it in every wildfire to date, unless they're naplamed, or the fire wasn't put out.

If China has space lasers. Russia does. It hasn't used them in Ukraine to ignite Kiev and melt missile defense.

Except no. The satellite weapons are still anti satellite, with the potential to knock out re-entry vehicles, missiles, and sooner re-entry drones. Those drones will also be fitted with them. They're big ass unmmaned jets effectively. For re-entry. It's 7th gen or test stages, they have had smaller success as drones. If missiles still used as anti Sat killers are being replaced by that kind of space weapon. We're still talking time. Or syfi. 6th gen is only just entering the battlefield. Most nations are still prototype stages. It isn't re-entry. Perhaps it has the potential to reach upper orbit the Russuans can but they don't pop up in Antarctica yet.

The problem I have is the forensics. The superheated burn spots. Simply put when you touch something hot you get burnt, the contact trace point of the source. Every fire is this. The contact point of where the fire started. With lasers it's superhot. It either tears through the object punching a hole, or it bores through it like a drill. On metals there are distinct burn patterns, where it superheated boring through the metal until whatever combustibles encased ignited or explodes. So when you have a bunch of cars and metal roofs supposedly being hit by a satellite above it, where are the trace points? Perhaps it was lost in the blaze, side car doors, window, but there would still be this forensic evidence on the thousands of cars.

There is no laser that can fire in nanoseconds at 2200 houses and how many cars and boats. Average what 5000 times. No laser fired off that many shots or even 50x gigawatt/megawatt shots. Not from a satellite. No way. Not in that window it needs to charge. Or you need a huge fucking power source and cooling. Impossibly.

The moon the rovers did it? Like India's lunar landing. Come on.

Instead the aluminium cars like in California, Canada, Stralia, Greece melted because they're made out of increasing alloys, and the houses aswell are full of combustibles. The trees are often more fireproof. See it in every wildfire to date, unless they're naplamed, or the fire wasn't put out.

If China has space lasers. Russia does. It hasn't used them in Ukraine to ignite Kiev and melt missile defense.

Except no. The satellite weapons are still anti satellite, with the potential to knock re-entry vehicles, missiles, and sooner reentry drones. Those drones will be fitted with them.

The problem I have is the forensics. The superheated burn spots. Simply put when you touch something hot you get burnt, the contact trace point of the source. Every fire is this. The contact point of where the fire started. With lasers it's superhot. It either tears through the object punching a hole, or it bores through it like a drill. On metals there are distinct burn patterns, where it superheated boring through the metal until whatever combustibles encased ignited or explodes. So when you have a bunch of cars and metal roofs supposedly being hit by a satellite above it, where are the trace points? Perhaps it was lost in the blaze, side car doors, window, but there would still be this forensic evidence on the thousands of cars.

There is no laser that can fire in nanoseconds at 2200 houses and how many cars and boats. Average what 5000 times. No laser fired off that many shots or even 50x gigawatt/megawatt shots. Not from a satellite. No way. Not in that window it needs to charge. Or you need a huge fucking power source and cooling. Impossibly.

The moon the rovers did it? Like India's lunar landing. Come on.

Instead the aluminium cars like in California, Canada, Stralia, Greece melted because they're made out of increasing alloys, and the houses aswell are full of combustibles. The trees are often more fireproof. See it in every wildfire to date, unless they're naplamed, or the fire wasn't put out.

If China has space lasers. Russia does. It hasn't used them in Ukraine to ignite Kiev and melt missiles defense.

Except no. The satellite weapons are still anti satellite, with the potential to knock re-entry vehicles, missiles, and sooner reentry drones. Those drones will be fitted with them.

The problem I have is the forensics. The superheated burn spots. Simply put when you touch something hot you get burnt, the contact trace point of the source. Every fire is this. The contact point of whete the fire started. With lasers it's superhot. It either tears through the object punching a hole, or it bores through it like a drill. On metals there are distinct burn patterns, where it superheated boring through the metal until whatever combustibles encased ignited or explodes. So when you have a bunch of cars and metal roofs supposedly being hit by a satellite above it, where are the trace points? Perhaps it was lost in the blaze, side car doors, window, but there would still be this forensic evidence on the thousands of cars.

There is no laser that can fire in nanoseconds at 2200 houses and how many cars and boats. Average what 5000 times. No laser fired off that many shots or even 50x gigawatt/megawatt shots. Not from a satellite. No way. Not in that window it needs to charge. Or you need a huge fucking power source and cooling. Impossibly.

The moon the rovers did it? Like India's lunar landing. Come on.

Instead the aluminium cars like in California, Canada, Stralia, Greece melted because they're made out of increasing alloys, and the houses aswell are full of combustibles. The trees are often more fireproof. See it in every wildfire to date, unless they're naplamed, or the fire wasn't put out.

Except no. The satellite weapons are still anti satellite, with the potential to knock re-entry vehicles, missiles, and sooner reentry drones. Those drones will be fitted with them.

The problem I have is the forensics. The superheated burn spots. Simply put when you touch something hot you get burnt, the contact trace point of the source. Every fire is this. The contact point of whete the fire started. With lasers it's superhot. It either tears through the object punching a hole, or it bores through it like a drill. On metals there are distinct burn patterns, where it superheated boring through the metal until whatever combustibles encased ignited or explodes. So when you have a bunch of cars and metal roofs supposedly being hit by a satellite above it, where are the trace points? Perhaps it was lost in the blaze, side car doors, window, but there would still be this forensic evidence on the thousands of cars.

There is no laser that can fire in nanoseconds at 2200 houses and how many cars and boats. Average what 5000 times. No laser fired off that many shots or even 50x gigawatt/megawatt shots. Not from a satellite. No way.

The moon the rovers did it? Like India's lunar landing. Come on.

Instead the aluminium cars like in California, Canada, Stralia, Greece melted because they're made out of increasing alloys, and the houses. The trees are often more fireproof. See it in every wildfire to date, unless they're naplamed, or the fire wasn't put out.