They aren't Hegel's stratagems exactly......Hegelian, yes. ..Hegel made observations, about the dialectic. Dividers use it to accomplish their goals. It wasn't invented, or 'created' except as a by-product of dualist nature coming into being.

This was known as Zeno's Paradox in western history.

The "Middle" of the cross, between it's arms, the two thieves at the opposites, who actually represent the dichotomy of nature. The 'middle arm' represents the quiet still fulcrum between the extremes. The base from which they deviate.

It represents the chrism and one who accepts as the christ.

The study of dualism in nature, in Asia produced Taoism aka 'The Middle Way'.

Darkness, being not a thing, but absent of a thing, it makes little sense to say God has 'nothing to do with it'. It's saying he has nothing to do with nothing.

You seem to misunderstand what is meant by 'middle' here. The fulcrum has equal parts to either side...........but isn't either.

The hub of a wheel is comparable in other traditions.

The problem is dualism and stressing the opposite sides as mere opposites, not paired concepts and this perpetuates the dichotomy that some know how to take to their advantage.

In Egypt, the heart is laid on a scale upon death to gauge both it's 'weight' and 'balance'. Reasons.

Everything in it's extreme becomes it's opposite. Explain.

They aren't Hegel's stratagems exactly......Hegelian, yes. ..Hegel made observations, about the dialectic. Dividers use it to accomplish their goals. It wasn't invented, or 'created' except as a by-product of dualist nature coming into being.

This was known as Zeno's Paradox in western history.

The "Middle" of the cross, between it's arms, the two thieves who actually represent the dichotomy of nature. It represents the chrism and one who accepts as the christ.

The study of dualism in nature, in Asia produced Taoism aka 'The Middle Way'.

Darkness, being not a thing, but absent of a thing, it makes little sense to say God has 'nothing to do with it'. It's saying he has nothing to do with nothing.

You seem to misunderstand what is meant by 'middle' here. The fulcrum has equal parts to either side...........but isn't either.

The hub of a wheel is comparable in other traditions.

The problem is dualism and stressing the opposite sides as mere opposites, not paired concepts and this perpetuates the dichotomy that some know how to take to their advantage.

In Egypt, the heart is laid on a scale upon death to gauge both it's 'weight' and 'balance'. Reasons.

Everything in it's extreme becomes it's opposite. Explain.

They aren't Hegel's stratagems exactly......Hegelian, yes. ..Hegel made observations, about the dialectic. Dividers use it to accomplish their goals. It wasn't invented, or 'created' except as a by-product of dualist nature coming into being.

This was known as Zeno's Paradox in western history.

The "Middle" of the cross, between it's arms, the two thieves who actually represent the dichotomy of nature. It represents the chrism and one who accepts as the christ.

The study of dualism in nature, in Asia produced Taoism aka 'The Middle Way'.

Darkness being an absence of light, it makes no sense to say God has 'nothing to do with it'.

You seem to misunderstand what is meant by 'middle' here. The fulcrum has equal parts to either side...........but isn't either.

The hub of a wheel is comparable in other traditions.

The problem is dualism and stressing the opposite sides as mere opposites, not paired concepts and this perpetuates the dichotomy that some know how to take to their advantage.

In Egypt, the heart is laid on a scale upon death to gauge both it's 'weight' and 'balance'. Reasons.

Everything in it's extreme becomes it's opposite. Explain.

They aren't Hegel's stratagems exactly......Hegelian, yes. ..Hegel made observations, about the dialectic. Dividers use it to accomplish their goals. It wasn't invented, or 'created' except as a by-product of dualist nature coming into being.

This was known as Zeno's Paradox in western history.

The "Middle" of the cross, between it's arms, the two thieves who actually represent the dichotomy of nature. It represents the chrism and one who accepts as the christ.

The study of dualism in nature, in Asia produced Taoism aka 'The Middle Way'.

Darkness being an absence of light, it makes no sense to say God has 'nothing to do with it'.

You seem to misunderstand what is meant by 'middle' here. The fulcrum has equal parts to either side...........but isn't either.

The hub of a wheel is comparable in other traditions.

The problem is dualism and stressing the opposite sides as mere opposites, not paired concepts perpetuates the problem.

In Egypt, the heart is laid on a scale upon death to gauge both it's 'weight' and 'balance'. Reasons.

Everything in it's extreme becomes it's opposite. Explain.

They aren't Hegel's stratagems exactly......Hegelian, yes. ..Hegel made observations, about the dialectic. Dividers use it to accomplish their goals. It wasn't invented, or 'created' except as a by-product of dualist nature coming into being.

This was known as Zeno's Paradox in western history.

The "Middle" of the cross, between it's arms, the two thieves who actually represent the dichotomy of nature. It represents the chrism and one who accepts as the christ.

The study of dualism in nature, in Asia produced Taoism aka 'The Middle Way'.

Darkness being an absence of light, it makes no sense to say God has 'nothing to do with it'.

You seem to mistake someone's doctrine for fact and misrepresent my understanding with your own version of what you think I'm saying. It isn't correct.

The problem is dualism and stressing the opposite sides as mere opposites, not paired concepts perpetuates the problem.

In Egypt, the heart is laid on a scale upon death to gauge both it's 'weight' and 'balance'. Reasons.

Everything in it's extreme becomes it's opposite. Explain.

They aren't Hegelian stratagems exactly........Hegel made observations, about the dialectic. Dividers use it to accomplish their goals. It wasn't invented, or 'created' except as a by-product of dualist nature coming into being.

This was known as Zeno's Paradox in western history.

The "Middle" of the cross, between it's arms, the two thieves who actually represent the dichotomy of nature. It represents the chrism and one who accepts as the christ.

The study of dualism in nature, in Asia produced Taoism aka 'The Middle Way'.

Darkness being an absence of light, it makes no sense to say God has 'nothing to do with it'.

You seem to mistake someone's doctrine for fact and misrepresent my understanding with your own version of what you think I'm saying. It isn't correct.

The problem is dualism and stressing the opposite sides as mere opposites, not paired concepts perpetuates the problem.

In Egypt, the heart is laid on a scale upon death to gauge both it's 'weight' and 'balance'. Reasons.

Everything in it's extreme becomes it's opposite. Explain.

They aren't Hegelian stratagems exactly........Hegel made observations, about the dialectic. Dividers use it to accomplish their goals. It wasn't invented, or 'created' except as a by-product of dualist nature coming into being.

This was known as Zeno's Paradox in western history.

The "Middle" of the cross, between it's arms, the two thieves who actually represent the dichotomy of nature. It represents the chrism and one who accepts as the christ.

The study of dualism in nature, in Asia produced Taoism aka 'The Middle Way'.

Darkness being an absence of light, it makes no sense to say God has 'nothing to do with it'.

You seem to mistake someone's doctrine for fact and misrepresent my understanding with your own version of what you think I'm saying. It isn't correct.

The problem is dualism and stressing the opposite sides as mere opposites, not paired concepts perpetuates the problem.

Everything in it's extreme becomes it's opposite. Explain.