Haha, I don't know.

But as far as the topic. I doubt the veracity of that King. Yes everything I said, checks out. Moses is undoubtedly a fable. The Sargon of Akkad proves it. Cain and Abel are another common story, read about Roman origin, Romulus and Remus. The same. What about Egyptian. Ah look it's there again. Like Enlil and Enki. Based on that probability is Solomon real? What about Joshua, and Samson? None of it. Some of it. The entire book. It has no historical record. The record didn't exist until it was written by children and slaves in Babylon. The Talmund. It is afterwards, the destruction of Babylon, it becomes what it is today.

Today it might as well be the lost tribe of Mickey Mouse. Batman's church of the redeemer.

Solomon is faster a bigger occult symbol. As the user posting has described. Nothing but controversy.

Solomon had become an occult symbol in the renaissance believe it or not. Think it was an advisor to Queen Elizabeth, John Dee, who kept an extensive collection of occultism, much of it based on this topic, Solomon's key, like this topic suggests, various grimoires, and such, origin tracing back to the Summerian and Egyptian. There is perhaps a little more on how such books weren't burnt. If they were genuine, most were rewritten over time.

Until they simply became amusing like the devil's codex. Codex Gigas. A hoax.

Haha, I don't know.

But as far as the topic. I doubt the veracity of that King. Yes everything I said, checks out. Moses is undoubtedly a fable. The Sargon of Akkad proves it. Cain and Abel are another common story, read about Roman origin, Romulus and Remus. The same. What about Egyptian. Ah look it's there again. Like Enlil and Enki. Based on that probability is Solomon real? What about Joshua, and Samson? None of it. Some of it. The entire book. It has no historical record. The record didn't exist until it was written by children and slaves in Babylon. The Talmund. It is afterwards, the destruction of Babylon, it becomes what it is today.

Today it might as well be the lost tribe of Mickey Mouse. Batman's church of the redeemer.

Solomon is faster a bigger occult symbol. As the user posting has described. Nothing but controversy.

Solomon had become an occult symbol in the renaissance believe it or not. Think it was an advisor to Queen Elizabeth, John Dee, who kept an extensive collection of occultism, much of it based on this topic, Solomon's key, like this topic suggests, various grimoires, and such, origin tracing back to the Summerian and Egyptian. There is perhaps a little more on how such books weren't burnt. If they were genuine, most were rewritten over time.

Until they simply became amusing like the devil's codex. Codex Gina's. A hoax.

Haha, I don't know.

But as far as the topic. I doubt the veracity of that King. Yes everything I said, checks out. Moses is undoubtedly a fable. The Sargon of Akkad proves it. Cain and Abel are another common story, read about Roman origin, Romulus and Remus. The same. What about Egyptian. Ah look it's there again. Like Enlil and Enki. Based on that probability is Solomon real? What about Joshua, and Samson? None of it. Some of it. The entire book. It has no historical record. The record didn't exist until it was written by children and slaves in Babylon. The Talmund. It is afterwards, the destruction of Babylon, it becomes what it is today.

Today it might as well be the lost tribe of Mickey Mouse. Batman's church of the redeemer.

Solomon is faster a bigger occult symbol. As the user posting has described. Nothing but controversy.

Solomon had become an occult symbol in the renaissance believe it or not. Think it was an advisor to Queen Elizabeth, John Dee, who kept an extensive collection of occultism, much of it based on this topic, Solomon's key, like this topic suggests, various grimoires, and such, origin tracing back to the Summerian and Egyptian. There is perhaps a little more on how such books weren't burnt. If they were genuine, most were rewritten over time.

Until they simply became amusing like the devil's codex. A hoax.

Haha, I don't know.

But as far as the topic. I doubt the veracity of that King. Yes everything I said, checks out. Moses is undoubtedly a fable. The Sargon of Akkad proves it. Cain and Abel are another common story, read about Roman origin, Romulus and Remus. The same. What about Egyptian. Ah look it's there again. Like Enlil and Enki. Based on that probability is Solomon real? What about Joshua, and Samson? None of it. Some of it. The entire book. It has no historical record. The record didn't exist until it was written by children and slaves in Babylon. The Talmund. It is afterwards, the destruction of Babylon, it becomes what it is today.

Today it might as well be the lost tribe of Mickey Mouse. Batman's church of the redeemer.

Solomon is faster a bigger occult symbol. As the user posting has described. Nothing but controversy.