Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Ok, I see. I wasn't clear on that follow up sentence. The "that" I was referring to is the stringification you showed in the video of carbon nanotubes under an electric field. Not production of graphene from carbon nanotubes, which was not in my mind.

The paper you showed confirmed my first sentence, "Graphene may be carbon, but it is a flat sheet and not a tube" which is what I'm seeing.

Also, although 5G used EMF (which includes an electromagnetic component) a microwave emf does not behave the same as a pure electric field, so it isn't certain such an effect would be produced by it unless the experiment uses emfs directly. Not to mention the fact it was using carbon nano tubes and not graphene molecules. I don't claim I know for sure all of what graphene can do, just saying there is insufficient evidence to conclusively say the rope clots are from that.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I see why you got confused. I wasn't clear on that follow up sentence. The "that" I was referring to is the stringification you showed in the video of carbon nanotubes under an electric field. Not production of graphene from carbon nanotubes, which was not in my mind.

The paper you showed confirmed my first sentence, "Graphene may be carbon, but it is a flat sheet and not a tube"

Also, although 5G used EMF (which includes an electromagnetic component) a microwave emf does not behave the same as a pure electric field, so it isn't at all certain such an effect would be produced by it unless the experiment uses emfs directly. Not to mention the fact it was using carbon nano tubes and not graphene molecules.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I see why you got confused. I wasn't clear on that follow up sentence. The "that" I was referring to is the stringification you showed in the video of carbon nanotubes under an electric field. Not production of graphene from carbon nanotubes, which was not in my mind at all.

The paper you showed confirmed my first sentence, "Graphene may be carbon, but it is a flat sheet and not a tube"

Also, although 5G used EMF (which includes an electromagnetic component) a microwave emf does not behave the same as a pure electric field, so it isn't at all certain such an effect would be produced by it unless the experiment uses emfs directly. Not to mention the fact it was using carbon nano tubes and not graphene molecules.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I see. You got confused because I wasn't clear on that follow up sentence. The "that" I was referring to is the stringification you showed in the video of carbon nanotubes under an electric field. Not production of graphene from carbon nanotubes, which was not in my mind at all.

The paper you showed confirmed my first sentence, "Graphene may be carbon, but it is a flat sheet and not a tube"

Also, although 5G used EMF (which includes an electromagnetic component) a microwave emf does not behave the same as a pure electric field, so it isn't at all certain such an effect would be produced by it unless the experiment uses emfs directly. Not to mention the fact it was using carbon nano tubes and not graphene molecules.

1 year ago
1 score