Ukraine's biggest problem is they're a common thief. Thief for who causing what remains questionable. Those tactics aren't by buying much except continued begging for further funding. They aren't the gatekeepers of democracy. They're a conflict that's now becoming another handout and an embarrassment. Never before had the hardware gifted been defeated until Ukraine used it, and it simply demands more of it.

They have recklessly charged, often in attempts to gain more funding and support. Throwing away troops and vehicles, instead of actually fighting larger battles with them. At what point haven't they observed minefields. At what point aren't they committing to different wedges and formations. They've kept a percentage behind, reinforcing a huge line, they want to cause a counter offensive from, but instead have sporadically thrown equipment away by attacking and probing multiple fronts. More seems committed towards any defense then engagement. Because when they have pressed, it's using tactics and propaganda that they simply goad more funding and aid from.

They're using missiles and drones often causing further provocation. Attacks on bridges, inside Russia, Svastapol. These haven't gained ground. They make dumb headlines. In attempts to draw more support from provocation, and keep the publicity printing.

Airpower, their lack of, would make no difference, because it hasn't, when they've had it. They're not using it now to any real engagement. Missiles, and drones are being used off the frontal battlefield. Using it would be the same rationality, off the battlefield at targets causing escalation.

The article suggests it is going badly, because it is. It suggests an increasing lack of interest. Sure it has the same backing by Global leaders, but everybody else is becoming real bored of it. So instead it makes splashy headlines by provoking escalation or garnishing funding by drawing out losses.

Try to convince me of any other attrition?

Don't worry, rainy season, the fall, approaches, their headway hasn't done much prior. It just needs more????

Ukraine's biggest problem is they're a common thief. Thief for who causing what remains questionable. Those tactics aren't by buying much except continued begging for further funding. They aren't the gatekeepers of democracy. They're a conflict that's now becoming another handout and an embarrassment. Never before had the hardware gifted been defeated until Ukraine used it, and it simply demands more of it.

They have recklessly charged, often in attempts to gain more funding and support. Throwing away troops and vehicles, instead of actually fighting larger battles with them. At what point haven't they observed minefields. At what point aren't they committing to different wedges and formations. They've kept a percentage behind, reinforcing a huge line, they want to cause a counter offensive from, but instead have sporadically thrown equipment away by attacking and probing multiple fronts. More seems committed towards any defense then engagement. Because when they have pressed, it's using tactics and propaganda that they simply goad more funding and aid from.

They're using missiles and drones often causing further provocation. Attacks on bridges, inside Russia, Svastapol. These haven't gained ground. They make dumb headlines. In attempts to draw more support from provocation, and keep the publicity printing.

Airpower, their lack of, would make no difference, because it hasn't, when they've had it. They're not using it now to any real engagement. Missiles, and drones are being used off the frontal battlefield. Using it would be the same rationality, off the battlefield at targets causing escalation.

The article suggests it is going badly, because it is. It suggests an increasing lack of interest. Sure it has the same backing by Global leaders, but everybody else is becoming real bored of it. So instead it makes splashy headlines by provoking escalation or garnishing funding by drawing out losses.

Try to convince me of any other attrition?

Ukraine's biggest problem is they're a common thief. Thief for who causing what remains questionable. Those tactics aren't by buying much except continued begging for further funding. They aren't the gatekeepers of democracy. They're a conflict that's now becoming another handout and an embarrassment. Never before had the hardware gifted been defeated until Ukraine used it, and it simply demands more of it.

They have recklessly charged, often in attempts to gain more funding and support. Throwing away troops and vehicles, instead of actually fighting larger battles with them. At what point haven't they observed minefields. At what point aren't they committing to different wedges and formations. They've kept a percentage behind, reinforcing a huge line, they want to cause a counter offensive from, but instead have sporadically thrown equipment away by attacking and probing multiple fronts. More seems committed towards any defense then engagement. Because when they have pressed, it's using tactics and propaganda that they simply goad more funding and aid from.

They're using missiles and drones often causing further provocation. Attacks on bridges, inside Russia, Svastapol. These haven't gained ground. They make dumb headlines. In attempts to draw more support from provocation, and keep the publicity printing.

Airpower, their lack of, would make no difference, because it hasn't, when they've had it. They're not using it now to any real engagement. Missiles, and drones are being used off the frontal battlefield. Using it would be the same rationality, off the battlefield at targets causing escalation.

The article suggests it is going badly, because it is. It suggests an increasing lack of interest. Sure it has the same backing by Global leaders, but everybody else is becoming real bored of it. So instead it makes splashy headlines by provoking escalation or garnishing funding by drawing out losses.