They were specifically advised against vaccination by the WHO, as they weren't a risk group, and the probability of adverse reactions increase in younger ages.
So what happened was JJ a vaccine already being banned in the rest of the World, set out to prove against health policy its vaccine was safe and effective for younger ages, that there was a zero risk group in, outside of the higher probability of side affects.
There you go. He killed his kid. It should be jailtime. It was simply to sell the product.
The guidelines weren't vaxxing under 14. Eventually a few manufactures came out suggesting they'd produced a vaxx that was safe for children.
But JJ wasn't it. It was a vaxx specifically being banned in many nations, for the very risks she died from. They all had those risks to more or less extents. But JJ was removed almost immediately. Perhaps it tuned it later on a booster?
Who knows exactly which vaxx she was given? But it kind of strikes you as the one her father sold.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/05/15/health/johnson-johnson-covid-vaccine-end/index.html
The latest article is too late in the States, it had been banned in quite a few nations prior to 2023. Almost immediately it had risks like Moderna
The fact checker shows and suggests the guidelines.
They were specifically advised against vaccination by the WHO, as they weren't a risk group, and the probability of adverse reactions increase in younger ages.
So what happened was JJ a vaccine already being banned in the rest of the World, set out to prove against health policy its vaccine was safe and effective for younger ages, that there was zero risk in, outside of the higher probability of side affects.
There you go. He killed his kid. It should be jailtime. It was simply to sell the product.
The guidelines weren't vaxxing under 14. Eventually a few manufactures came out suggesting they'd produced a vaxx that was safe for children.
But JJ wasn't it. It was a vaxx specifically being banned in many nations, for the very risks she died from. They all had those risks to more or less extents. But JJ was removed almost immediately. Perhaps it tuned it later on a booster?
Who knows exactly which vaxx she was given? But it kind of strikes you as the one her father sold.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/05/15/health/johnson-johnson-covid-vaccine-end/index.html
The latest article is too late in the States, it had been banned in quite a few nations prior to 2023. Almost immediately it had risks like Moderna
The fact checker shows and suggests the guidelines.
They were specifically advised against vaccination by the WHO, as they weren't a risk group, and the probability of adverse reactions increase in younger ages.
So what happened was JJ a vaccine already being banned in the rest of the World, set out to prove against health policy its vaccine was safe and effective for younger ages, that there was zero risk in, outside of the higher probability of side affects.
There you go. He killed his kid. It should be jailtime. It was simply to sell the product.
The guidelines weren't vaxxing under 14. Eventually a few manufactures came out suggesting they'd produced a vaxx that was safe for children.
But JJ wasn't it. It was a vaxx specifically being banned in many nations, for the very risks she died from. They all had those risks to more or less extents. But JJ was removed almost immediately. Perhaps it tuned it later on a booster?
Who knows exactly which vaxx she was given? But it kind of strikes you as the one her father sold.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/05/15/health/johnson-johnson-covid-vaccine-end/index.html
The latest article is too late in the States, it had been banned in quite a few nations prior to 2023. Almost immediately it has risks like Moderna
The fact checker shows and suggests the guidelines.
They were specifically advised against vaccination by the WHO, as they weren't a risk group, and the probability of adverse reactions increase in younger ages.
So what happened was JJ a vaccine already being banned in the rest of the World, set out to prove against health policy its vaccine was safe and effective for younger ages, that there was zero risk in, outside of the higher probability of side affects.
There you go. He killed his kid. It should be jailtime. It was simply to sell the product.
The guidelines weren't vaxxing under 14. Eventually a few manufactures came out suggesting they'd produced a vaxx that was safe for children.
But JJ wasn't it. It was a vaxx specifically being banned in many nations, for the very risks she died from. They all had those risks to more or less extents. But JJ was removed almost immediately. Perhaps it tuned it later on a booster?
Who knows exactly which vaxx she was given? But it kind of strikes you as the one her father sold.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/05/15/health/johnson-johnson-covid-vaccine-end/index.html
They were specifically advised against vaccination by the WHO, as they weren't a risk group, and the probability of adverse reactions increase in younger ages.
So what happened was JJ a vaccine already being banned in the rest of the World, set out to prove against health policy its vaccine was safe and effective for younger ages, that there was zero risk in, outside of the higher probability of side affects.
There you go. He killed his kid. It should be jailtime. It was simply to sell the product.
The guidelines weren't vaxxing under 14. Eventually a few manufactures came out suggesting they'd produced a vaxx that was safe for children.
But JJ wasn't it. It was a vaxx specifically being banned in many nations, for the very risks she died from. They all had those risks to more or less extents. But JJ was removed almost immediately. Perhaps it tuned it later on a booster?
Who knows exactly which vaxx she was given? But it kind of strikes you as the one her father sold.
They were specifically advised against vaccination by the WHO, as they weren't a risk group, and the probability of adverse reactions increase in younger ages.
So what happened was JJ a vaccine already being banned in the rest of the World, set out to prove against health policy its vaccine was safe and effective for younger ages, that there was zero risk in, outside of the higher probability of side affects.
There you go. He killed his kid. It should be jailtime. It was simply to sell the product.
The guidelines weren't vaxxing under 14. Eventually a few manufactures came out suggesting they'd produced a vaxx that was safe for children.
But JJ wasn't it. It was a vaxx specifically being banned in many nations, for the very risks she died from. They all had those risks to more or less extents. But JJ was removed almost immediately. Perhaps it tuned it later on a booster?
They were specifically advised against vaccination by the WHO, as they weren't a risk group, and the probability of adverse reactions increase in younger ages.
So what happened was JJ a vaccine already being banned in the rest of the World, set out to prove against health policy its vaccine was safe and effective for younger ages, that there was zero risk in, outside of the higher probability of side affects.
There you go. He killed his kid. It should be jailtime. It was simply to sell the product.
The guidelines weren't vaxxing under 14. Eventually a few manufactures came out suggesting they'd produced a vaxx that was safe for children.
But JJ wasn't it. It was a vaxx specifically being banned in many nations
They were specifically advised against vaccination by the WHO, as they weren't a risk group, and the probability of adverse reactions increase in younger ages.
So what happened was JJ a vaccine already being banned in the rest of the World, set out to prove against health policy its vaccine was safe and effective for younger ages, that there was zero risk in, outside of the higher probability of side affects.
There you go. He killed his kid. It should be jailtime. It was simply to sell the product.