Absolutely. How many more services cater for this person/persons. How many more. In the West, they did this, MiT, a single baby growing to a toddler is worth in emissions a lifetime of flights from London to Paris.

There is nothing environmental about mass migration. Remember the narrative, man made. So it is human intervention that has caused climate change.

The single biggest event in climate history would be the USA.

Today it's mass migration.

But there is absolutely nothing green or environmental in the narrative it exploits new products and services. Therefore mass migration isn't an issue. It's also profiting. Banks the major sponsors cause debt. They therefore profit. More services, causing premiums, every transaction pays the bank. Every loan. Meanwhile land owners and service providers increase rent and subscriptions. Generating revenue for the banks, loaning.

Nothing environmental about it. Human intervention. Nature their own hostile environment, hot, lack of food isn't culling them, instead they're flooding into urbanisation causing and increasing products and services. It in turn is impacting the climate. We are talking the global population quadrupling in less than 100 years. What has caused it. Mass migration.

Until far more are economic migrants, they have an IPhone it tells them too.

Wildfires in Greece mass migration, Italy, in Australia, in Spain, Canada, Sweden, California. Look at those populations. What about Pakistan. Florida. Bangladesh. Look at that population and migration.

Migrants should pay a carbon tax. It should be like student loans. They should be indentured to the climates they impact.

Absolutely. How many more services cater for this person/persons. How many more. In the West, they did this, MiT, a single baby growing to a toddler is worth in emissions a lifetime of flights from London to Paris.

There is nothing environmental about mass migration. Remember the narrative, man made. So it is human intervention that has caused climate change.

The single biggest event in climate history would be the USA.

Today it's mass migration.

But there is absolutely nothing green or environmental in the narrative it exploits new products and services. Therefore mass migration isn't an issue. It's also profiting. Banks the major sponsors cause debt. They therefore profit. More services, causing premiums, every transaction pays the bank. Every loan. Meanwhile land owners and service providers increase rent and subscriptions. Generating revenue for the banks, loaning.

Nothing environmental about it. Human intervention. Nature their own hostile environment, hot, lack of food isn't culling them, instead they're flooding into urbanisation causing and increasing products and services. It in turn is impacting the climate. We are talking the global population quadrupling in less than 100 years. What has caused it. Mass migration.

Until far more are economic migrants, they have an IPhone it tells them too.

Absolutely. How many more services cater for this person/persons. How many more. In the West, they did this, MiT, a single baby growing to a toddler is worth in emissions a lifetime of flights from London to Paris.

There is nothing environmental about mass migration. Remember the narrative, man made. So it is human intervention that has caused climate change.

The single biggest event in climate history would be the USA.

Today it's mass migration.

But there is absolutely nothing green or environmental in the narrative it exploits new products and services. Therefore mass migration isn't an issue. It's also profits. Banks the major sponsors cause debt. They therefore profit. More services, causing premiums, every transaction pays the bank. Every loan. Meanwhile land owners and service providers increase rent and subscriptions. Generating revenue for the banks, loaning.

Nothing environmental about it. Human intervention. Nature their own hostile environment, hot, lack of food isn't culling them, instead they're flooding into urbanisation causing and increasing products and services. It in turn is impacting the climate. We are talking the global population quadrupling in less than 100 years. What has caused it. Mass migration.

Until far more are economic migrants, they have an IPhone it tells them too.

Absolutely. How many more services cater for this person/persons. How many more. In the West, they did this, MiT, a single baby growing to a toddler is worth in emissions a lifetime of flights from London to Paris.

There is nothing environmental about mass migration. Remember the narrative, man made. So it is human intervention that has caused climate change.

The single biggest event in climate history would be the USA.

Today it's mass migration.

But there is absolutely nothing green or environmental in the narrative it exploits new products and services. Therefore mass migration isn't an issue. It's also profit. Banks the major sponsors cause debt. They therefore profit. More services, causing premiums, every transaction pays the bank. Every loan. Meanwhile land owners and service providers increase rent and subscriptions. Generating revenue for the banks, loaning.

Nothing environmental about it. Human intervention. Nature their own hostile environment, hot, lack of food isn't culling them, instead they're flooding into urbanisation causing and increasing products and services. It in turn is impacting the climate. We are talking the global population quadrupling in less than 100 years. What has caused it. Mass migration.

Until far more are economic migrants, they have an IPhone it tells them too.

Absolutely. How many more services cater for this person/persons. How many more. In the West, they did this a single baby growing to a toddler is worth in emissions a lifetime of flights from London to Paris.

There is nothing environmental about mass migration. Remember the narrative, man made. So it is human intervention that has caused climate change.

The single biggest event in climate history would be the USA.

Today it's mass migration.

But there is absolutely nothing green or environmental in the narrative it exploits new products and services. Therefore mass migration isn't an issue. It's also profit. Banks the major sponsors cause debt. They therefore profit. More services, causing premiums, every transaction pays the bank. Every loan. Meanwhile land owners and service providers increase rent and subscriptions. Generating revenue for the banks, loaning.

Nothing environmental about it. Human intervention. Nature their own hostile environment, hot, lack of food isn't culling them, instead they're flooding into urbanisation causing and increasing products and services. It in turn is impacting the climate. We are talking the global population quadrupling in less than 100 years. What has caused it. Mass migration.

Until far more are economic migrants, they have an IPhone it tells them too.

Absolutely. How many more services cater for this person/persons. How many more.

There is nothing environmental about mass migration. Remember the narrative, man made. So it is human intervention that has caused climate change.

The single biggest event in climate history would be the USA.

Today it's mass migration.

But there is absolutely nothing green or environmental in the narrative it exploits new products and services. Therefore mass migration isn't an issue. It's also profit. Banks the major sponsors cause debt. They therefore profit. More services, causing premiums, every transaction pays the bank. Every loan. Meanwhile land owners and service providers increase rent and subscriptions. Generating revenue for the banks, loaning.

Nothing environmental about it. Human intervention. Nature their own hostile environment, hot, lack of food isn't culling them, instead they're flooding into urbanisation causing and increasing products and services. It in turn is impacting the climate. We are talking the global population quadrupling in less than 100 years. What has caused it. Mass migration.

Until far more are economic migrants, they have an IPhone it tells them too.

Absolutely. How many more services cater for this person/persons. How many more.

There is nothing environmental about mass migration. Remember the narrative, man made. So it is human intervention that has caused climate change.

The single biggest event in climate history would be the USA.

Today it's mass migration.

But there is absolutely nothing green or environmental in the narrative it exploits new products and services. Therefore mass migration isn't an issue. It's also profit. Banks the major sponsors cause debt. They therefore profit. More services, causing premiums, every transaction pays the bank. Every loan. Meanwhile land owners and service providers increase rent and subscriptions. Generating revenue for the banks, loaning.

Nothing environmental about it. Human intervention. Nature their own hostile environment, hot, lack of food isn't culling them, instead their flooding into urbanisation causing and increasing products and services.

Until far more are economic migrants, they have an IPhone it tells them too.