Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Yes. The Sahara was fertile. Prior to all of 12k years ago. With far more pockets of life. There is supposedly debunked Herodotus saying between Egypt and Libya spanned a huge river, then the labyrinith. Debunked because what's left is nothing of the sort. However the explanation that the Sahara was eroded over time by herders, and migratory herds, is rather ignorant. But it has been given. Like Lebanon great forests recorded as building the Ark, gone, or the forests around the Rock City of Petra, gone. Although these perhaps are human activity, with seismic, not the Sahara. For Example Hippo and crocodile remains are found up and down the Rhine.

Or the Nile retreating by 100s of miles. No what happened was something else. Extreme.

The point is they didn't build their stuff in a desert. At all. Lush fertile land, a river thriving with life. The life of the gods and planet. What fully went wrong. Perhaps population but we are talking far more than documented. Chinese founding recording of multi millions. China isn't a desert. Egypt supposedly didn't have those figures because later Roman recording doesn't.

Yawn. The Pyramids outer stone was limestone. This was maintained to be a smooth white sheen, ontop a solid gold capstone. Inner is mostly granite. The outer stone was maintained by the Egyptians restoring it. That restoration stopped after the Greeks.

Who knows. But they got their ideas from somewhere. They didn't wake up as monkeys and then build pyramids.

The point I am driving at is prediluvian civilization. How advanced. Pyramid. Obviously.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes. The Sahara was fertile. Prior to all of 12k years ago. With far more pockets of life. There is supposedly debunked Herodotus saying between Egypt and Libya spanned a huge river, then the labyrinith. Debunked because what's left is nothing of the sort. However the explanation that the Sahara was eroded over time by herders, and migratory herds, is rather ignorant. But it has been given. Like Lebanon great forests recorded as building the Ark, gone, or the forests around the Rock City of Petra, gone. Although these perhaps are human activity, with seismic, not the Sahara. For Example Hippo and crocodile remains are found up and down the Rhine.

Or the Nile retreating by 100s of miles. No what happened was something else. Extreme.

The point is they didn't build their stuff in a desert. At all. Lush fertile land, a river thriving with life. The life of the gods and planet. What fully went wrong. Perhaps population but we are talking far more than documented. Chinese founding recording of multi millions. China isn't a desert. Egypt supposedly didn't have those figures because later Roman recording doesn't.

Yawn. The Pyramids outer stone was limestone. This was maintained to be a smooth white sheen, ontop a solid gold capstone. Inner is mostly granite. The outer stone was maintained by the Egyptians restoring it. That restoration stopped after the Greeks.

Who knows. But they got their ideas from somewhere. They didn't wake up as monkeys and then build pyramids.

The point I am driving at is predolivian civilization. How advanced. Pyramid. Obviously.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes. The Sahara was fertile. Prior to all of 12k years ago. With far more pockets of life. There is supposedly debunked Horeodotus saying between Egypt and Libya spanned a huge river, then the labyrinith. Debunked because what's left is nothing of the sort. However the explanation that the Sahara was eroded over time by herders, and migratory herds, is rather ignorant. But it has been given. Like Lebanon great forests recorded as building the Ark, gone, or the forests around the Rock City of Petra, gone. Although these perhaps are human activity, with seismic, not the Sahara. For Example Hippo and crocodile remains are found up and down the Rhine.

Or the Nile retreating by 100s of miles. No what happened was something else. Extreme.

The point is they didn't build their stuff in a desert. At all. Lush fertile land, a river thriving with life. The life of the gods and planet. What fully went wrong. Perhaps population but we are talking far more than documented. Chinese founding recording of multi millions. China isn't a desert. Egypt supposedly didn't have those figures because later Roman recording doesn't.

Yawn. The Pyramids outer stone was limestone. This was maintained to be a smooth white sheen, ontop a solid gold capstone. Inner is mostly granite. The outer stone was maintained by the Egyptians restoring it. That restoration stopped after the Greeks.

Who knows. But they got their ideas from somewhere. They didn't wake up as monkeys and then build pyramids.

The point I am driving at is predolivian civilization. How advanced. Pyramid. Obviously.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes. The Sahara was fertile. Prior to all of 12k years ago. With far more pockets of life. There is supposedly debunked Horeodotus saying between Egypt and Libya spanned a huge river, then the labyrinith. Debunked because what's left is nothing of the sort. However the explanation that the Sahara was eroded over time by herders, and migratory herds, is rather ignorant. But it has been given. Like Lebanon great forests recorded as building the Ark, gone, or the forests around the Rock City of Petra, gone. Although these perhaps are human activity, with seismic, not the Sahara. For Example Hippo and crocodile remains are found up and down the Rhine.

Or the Nile retreating by 100s of miles. No what happened was something else. Extreme.

The point is they didn't build there stuff in a desert. At all. Lush fertile land, a river thriving with life. The life of the gods and planet. What fully went wrong. Perhaps population but we are talking far more than documented. Chinese founding recording of multi millions. China isn't a desert. Egypt supposedly didn't have those figures because later Roman recording doesn't.

Yawn. The Pyramids outer stone was limestone. This was maintained to be a smooth white sheen, ontop a solid gold capstone. Inner is mostly granite. The outer stone was maintained by the Egyptians restoring it. That restoration stopped after the Greeks.

Who knows. But they got their ideas from somewhere. They didn't wake up as monkeys and then build pyramids.

The point I am driving at is predolivian civilization. How advanced. Pyramid. Obviously.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes. The Sahara was fertile. Prior to all of 12k years ago. With far more pockets of life. There is supposedly debunked Horeodotus saying between Egypt and Libya spanned a huge river, then the labyrinith. Debunked because what's left is nothing of the sort. However the explanation that the Sahara was eroded over time by herders, and migratory herds, is rather ignorant. But it has been given. Like Lebanon great forests recorded as building the Ark, gone, or the forests around the Rock City of Petra, gone. Although these perhaps are human activity, with seismic, not the Sahara. For Example Hippo and crocodile remains are found up and down the Rhine.

Or the Nile retreating by 100s of miles. No what happened was something else. Extreme.

The point is they didn't build there stuff in a desert. At all. Lush fertile land, a river thriving with life. The life of the gods and planet. What fully went wrong. Perhaps population but we are talking far more than documented. Chinese founding recording of multi millions. China isn't a desert. Egypt supposedly didn't have those figures because later Roman recording doesn't.

Yawn. The Pyramids outer stone was limestone. This was maintained to be a smooth white sheen, ontop a solid gold capstone. Inner is mostly granite. The outer stone was maintained by the Egyptians restoring it. That restoration stopped after the Greeks.

Who knows. But they got their ideas from somewhere. They didn't wake up as monkeys and then build pyramids.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes. The Sahara was fertile. Prior to all of 12k years ago. With far more pockets of life. There is supposedly debunked Horeodotus saying between Egypt and Libya spanned a huge river, then the labyrinith. Debunked because what's left is nothing of the sort. However the explanation that the Sahara was eroded over time by herders, and migratory herds, is rather ignorant. But it has been given. Like Lebanon great forests recorded as building the Ark, gone, or the forests around the Rock City of Petra, gone. Although these perhaps are human activity, with seismic, not the Sahara.

Or the Nile retreating by 100s of miles. No what happened was something else. Extreme.

The point is they didn't build there stuff in a desert. At all. Lush fertile land, a river thriving with life. The life of the gods and planet. What fully went wrong. Perhaps population but we are talking far more than documented. Chinese founding recording of multi millions. China isn't a desert. Egypt supposedly didn't have those figures because later Roman recording doesn't.

Yawn. The Pyramids outer stone was limestone. This was maintained to be a smooth white sheen, ontop a solid gold capstone. Inner is mostly granite. The outer stone was maintained by the Egyptians restoring it. That restoration stopped after the Greeks.

Who knows. But they got their ideas from somewhere. They didn't wake up as monkeys and then build pyramids.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Yes. The Sahara was fertile. Prior to all of 12k years ago. With far more pockets of life. There is supposedly debunked Horeodotus saying between Egypt and Libya spanned a huge river, then the labyrinith. Debunked because what's left is nothing of the sort. However the explanation that the Sahara was eroded over time by herders, and migratory herds, is rather ignorant. But it has been given.

No what happened was something else.

The point is they didn't build there stuff in a desert. At all. Lush fertile land, a river thriving with life. The life of the gods and planet. What fully went wrong. Perhsps population but we are talking far more than documented. Chinese founding recording of multi millions. China isn't a desert. Egypt supposedly didn't have those figures because later Roman recording doesn't.

Yawn. The Pyramids outer stone was limestone. This was maintained to be a smooth white sheen, ontop a solid gold capstone. Inner is mostly granite. The outer stone was maintained by the Egyptians restoring it. That restoration stopped after the Greeks.

Who knows. But they got their ideas from somewhere. They didn't wake up as monkeys and then build pyramids.

1 year ago
1 score