report itself claims 5.9 seconds from the roof sagging to when it was done.
I bet your young enough to believe it was really a 757 that hit the pentagon, in a section that just happened to be empty due to remodeling. Im sure we will see those tapes anyyyyy day now. a 10 second clip missing frames is proably good enough for you though.
Also, care to explain why they were doing military scenarios that exact day for the exact thing? Talk about some luck on the terrorist's part.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2006/08/norad200608
All fake of course.
For the neads crew, 9/11 was not a story of four hijacked airplanes, but one of a heated chase after more than a dozen potential hijackings—some real, some phantom—that emerged from the turbulence of misinformation that spiked in the first 100 minutes of the attack and continued well into the afternoon and evening.
God was watching over someone that day.... wasnt the american people.
report itself claims 5.9 seconds from the roof sagging to when it was done.
I bet your young enough to believe it was really a 757 that hit the pentagon, in a section that just happened to be empty due to remodeling. Im sure we will see those tapes anyyyyy day now. a 10 second clip missing frames is proably good enough for you though.
Also, care to explain why they were doing military scenarios that exact day for the exact thing? Talk about some luck on the terrorist's part.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2006/08/norad200608
All fake of course.
For the neads crew, 9/11 was not a story of four hijacked airplanes, but one of a heated chase after more than a dozen potential hijackings—some real, some phantom—that emerged from the turbulence of misinformation that spiked in the first 100 minutes of the attack and continued well into the afternoon and evening.
God was watching over someone that day.... wasnt the american people.
report itself claims 5.9 seconds from the roof sagging to when it was done.
I bet your young enough to believe it was really a 757 that hit the pentagon, in a section that just happened to be empty due to remodeling. Im sure we will see those tapes anyyyyy day now. a 10 second clip missing frames is proably good enough for you though.
Also, care to explain why they were doing military scenarios that exact day for the exact thing? Talk about some luck on the terrorist's part.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2006/08/norad200608
All fake of course.
report itself claims 5.9 seconds from the roof sagging to when it was done.
I bet your young enough to believe it was really a 757 that hit the pentagon, in a section that just happened to be empty due to remodeling. Im sure we will see those tapes anyyyyy day now. a 10 second clip missing frames is proably good enough for you though.
report itself claims 5.9 seconds from the roof sagging to when it was done.
I bet your young enough to believe it was really a 757 that hit the pentagon, in a section that just happened to be emtpy due to remodeling. Im sure we will see those tapes anyyyyy day now. a 10 second cilp missing frames is proably good enough for you though.
report itself claims 5.9 seconds from the roof sagging to when it was done.