Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The probability is based on a number of factors placing the odds far higher Russia. They controlled it. Unless they have footage of another said attempt proving otherwise. You're defeating your own argument of natural causes. The rainfall wasn't higher.

How often does the upper dam controlled by Ukraine release the overflow? It isn't significant releasing it into the reservoir. If the dam was operational and maintained. Instead of bursting.

Probability placing it Russian objectively. The SouthWestern approach to the Crimea, on the eve's of the counter prooobing became flooded.

Ukrainian gain here is not social justice. It could be the upper dam. The upper dam now threatens the reactor. It also controls the flow from source, downstream. So if in the next 20 years as pumpstations, or more channels are made to the Crimea, it sooner depletes the reservoir, if let's suggest the battlefield hasn't changed. The reactor is also threatened by it.

Romans had everything to do with the founding of Russia. Dumbass. You're such a dumbass. Yes they also colonised Ukraine and drew crops from it. This is well documented. So did the Ottomans. Prior to the Romans, the Greeks had done the same.

This is very condensed history obviously but yes the Holy Roman Empire via the Church and appointed Monarchs expanded East pushing back the Mongols. Of course Russia set itself into the nation it became afterwards. Prior to this point Ukraine traded heavily with surrounding Empires influencing it. Of course history has conceptual narratives. There were horselords and tribes falling outside of the narrative. Any trade routes often date back much older than established narratives.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The probability is based on a number of factors placing the odds far higher Russia. They controlled it. Unless they have footage of another said attempt proving otherwise. You're defeating your own argument of natural causes. The rainfall wasn't higher.

How often does the upper dam controlled by Ukraine release the overflow? It isn't significant releasing it into the reservoir. If the dam was operational and maintained. Instead of bursting.

Probability placing it Russian objectively. The SouthWestern approach to the Crimea, on the eve's of the counter prooobing became flooded.

Ukrainian gain here is not social justice. It could be the upper dam. The upper dam now threatens the reactor. It also controls the flow from source, downstream. So if in the next 20 years as pumpstations, or more channels are made to the Crimea, it sooner depletes the reservoir, if let's suggest the battlefield hasn't changed. The reactor is also threatened by it.

Romans had everything to do with the founding of Russia. Dumbass. You're such a dumbass. Yes they also colonised Ukraine and drew crops from it. This is well documented. So did the Ottomans. Prior to the Romans, the Greeks had done the same.

1 year ago
1 score