Nope. Not until truce. Otherwise Nato are entering warfare. Warfare needs public support from retrospective governments. Many would grant it. But a few won't. No entry.
Aid and armament and mercs are greylines. Most Nato countries have unanimously agreed to support a potential member with such packages and training and funding. Ascension however puts Nato in direct warfare. Then what? Nukes.
The problem is the stakes keep rising, but they're not enough to grant public support for warfare.
So a truce of terms will have to be reached prior, after that Ukraine could possibly join if on agreement.
It is no where near truce or terms. Funding keeps supplying monkeys with no other grounds for a truce. They get guns and want to chargeee or proooooobe.
There are other possibilities Nato can directly enter, none of them are much better. Such as one of their own members, attacked, or suggestively if bigger atrocity occurred, perhaps a nuke, or if the government they're supporting is obliterated.
Dubiously this rhetoric always chances when Ukraine are losing and begging. It means nothing else currently. If they decided to preempt perhaps it could mean more. But they seem to be provoking it. Incoming are F16s. Doubt they'll fair any better. However in Ukrainian hands are a recipie for escalation.
You dumbass down voting. Why are there so many dumbasses on this forum. I don't fit in your narrative. Damn right, you're fucking dumb. But you don't see me attacking your speech with silly down votes. You're literally that autistic. There is no president of the Internet. It's not a contest, speaking. You dumb monkey. There's only conversation and information.
Nope. Not until truce. Otherwise Nato are entering warfare. Warfare needs public support from retrospective governments. Many would grant it. But a few won't. No entry.
Aid and armament and mercs are greylines. Most Nato countries have unanimously agreed to support a potential member with such packages and training and funding. Ascension however puts Nato in direct warfare. Then what? Nukes.
The problem is the stakes keep rising, but they're not enough to grant public support for warfare.
So a truce of terms will have to be reached prior, after that Ukraine could possibly join if on agreement.
It is no where near truce or terms. Funding keeps supplying monkeys with no other grounds for a truce. They get guns and want to chargeee or proooooobe.
There are other possibilities Nato can directly enter, none of them are much better. Such as one of their own members, attacked, or suggestively if bigger atrocity occurred, perhaps a nuke, or if the government they're supporting is obliterated.
Dubiously this rhetoric always chances when Ukraine are losing and begging. It means nothing else currently. If they decided to preempt perhaps it could mean more. But they seem to be provoking it. Incoming are F16s. Doubt they'll fair any better. However in Ukrainian hands are a recipie for escalation.
Nope. Not until truce. Otherwise Nato are entering warfare. Warfare needs public support from retrospective governments. Many would grant it. But a few won't. No entry.
Aid and armament and mercs are greylines. Most Nato countries have unanimously agreed to support a potential member with such packages and training and funding. Ascension however puts Nato in direct warfare. Then what? Nukes.
The problem is the stakes keep rising, but they're not enough to grant public support for warfare.
So a truce of terms will have to be reached prior, after that Ukraine could possibly join if on agreement.
It is no where near truce or terms. Funding keeps supplying monkeys with no other grounds for a truce. They get guns and want to chargeee or proooooobe.
There are other possibilities Nato can directly enter, none of them are much better.
Nope. Not until truce. Otherwise Nato are entering warfare. Warfare needs public support from retrospective governments. Many would grant it. But a few won't. No entry.
Aid and armament and mercs are greylines. Most Nato countries have unanimously agreed to support a potential member with such packages and training and funding. Ascension however puts Nato in direct warfare. Then what? Nukes.
The problem is the stakes keep rising, but they're not enough to grant public support for warfare.
Nope. Not until truce. Otherwise Nato are entering warfare. Warfare needs public support from retrospective governments. Many would grant it. But a few won't. No entry.
Aid and armament and mercs are greylines. Most Nato countries have unanimously agreed to support a potential member with such packages and training and funding. Ascension however puts Nato in direct warfare. Then what? Nukes.
Nope. Not until truce. Otherwise Nato are entering warfare. Warfare needs public support from retrospective governments. Many would grant it. But a few won't. No entry.
Aid and armament and mercy are greylines. Most Nato countries have unanimously agreed to support a potential member with such packages and training snd funding. Ascension however puts Nato in direct warfare. Then what? Nukes.