The coverage by Ukrainian sources hasn't understood warfare or contained any facts.

A few days ago. Earlier this week, this time last week, it would've appeared every single Western press outlet lied.

Today their president isn't even the Ukraine currently. Propaganda suddenly switches back to more funding.

What does it buy?

I find it ironic. Unsubstantiated and easier maneuvering, feign withdrawal, citing ammo, press positioning, bombard center, overrun position completely. Instead the press strained Ukraine position was counter offensive. When in fact they lost far more. That ratio was in what numbers? Think about it.

Not that even matters here. But it seems and as commented on, there are no facts being aired by media straining for obnoxious narratives. Instead of objectified facts.

The coverage by Ukrainian sources hasn't understood warfare or contained any facts.

A few days ago. Earlier this week, this time last week, it would've appeared every single Western press outlet lied.

Today their president isn't even the Ukraine currently. Propaganda suddenly switches back to more funding.

What does it buy?

I find it ironic. Unsubstantiated and easier maneuvering, feign withdrawal, citing ammo, press positioning, bombard center, overrun position completely. Instead the press strained Ukraine position was counter offensive. When in fact they lost far more. That ratio was in what numbers? Think about it.

Not that even matters here. But it seems and as commented on there are no facts being aired by media straining for obnoxious narratives. Instead of objectified facts.

The coverage by Ukrainian sources hasn't understood warfare or contained any facts.

A few days ago. Earlier this week, this time last week, it would've appeared every single Western press outlet lied.

Today their president isn't even the Ukraine currently. Propaganda suddenly switches back to more funding.

What does it buy?

I find it ironic. Unsubstantiated and easier maneuvering, feign withdrawal, citing ammo, press positioning, bombard center, overrun position completely. Instead the press strained Ukraine position was counter offensive. When in fact they lost far more. That ratio was in what numbers? Think about it.

The coverage by Ukrainian sources hasn't understood warfare or contained any facts.

A few days ago. Earlier this week, this time last week, it would've appeared every single Western press outlet lied.

Today their president isn't even the Ukraine currently. Propaganda suddenly switches back to more funding.

What does it buy?

I find it ironic. Unsubstantiated and easier maneuvering feign withdrawal, citing ammo, press flanks, bombard center, overrun position completely. Instead the press strained Ukraine position was counter offensive. When in fact they lost far more. That ratio was in what numbers? Think about it.

The coverage by Ukrainian sources hasn't understood warfare or contained any facts.

A few days ago. Earlier this week, this time last week, it would've appeared every single Western press outlet lied.

Today their president isn't even the Ukraine currently. Propaganda suddenly switches back to more funding.

What does it buy?

I find it ironic. Unsubstantiated and easier maneuvering feign withdrawal, citjng ammo, press flanks, bombard center, overrun position completely. Instead the press strained Ukraine position was counter offensive. When in fact they lost far more. That ratio was in what numbers? Think about it.

The coverage by Ukrainian sources hasn't understood warfare or contained any facts.

A few days ago. Earlier this week, this time last week, it would've appeared every single Western press outlet lied.

Today their president isn't even the Ukraine currently. Propaganda suddenly switches back to more funding.

What does it buy?