Great investigative work.

Any way Trump could appeal the decision and argue that the law is bullshit?

Someone else mentioned that the law is ex post facto, which I know to be illegal under the Constitution.

Article I, Section 10, Clause 1:

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

I guess the argument could be made that the law only amends the statute of limitations so it's not really ex post facto.

Great investigative work.

Any way Trump could appeal the decision and argue that the law is bullshit?

Someone else mentioned that the law is ex post facto, which I know to be illegal under the Constitution.

Article I, Section 10, Clause 1:

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.