Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Great investigative work.

Any way Trump could appeal the decision and argue that the law is bullshit?

Someone else mentioned that the law is ex post facto, which I know to be illegal under the Constitution.

Article I, Section 10, Clause 1:

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

I guess the argument could be made that the law only amends the statute of limitations so it's not really ex post facto.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Great investigative work.

Any way Trump could appeal the decision and argue that the law is bullshit?

Someone else mentioned that the law is ex post facto, which I know to be illegal under the Constitution.

Article I, Section 10, Clause 1:

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

1 year ago
1 score